![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Stephen Paul" wrote in message ...
Does anyone have a web page with images like Bryan's, that is more comprehensive on the _process_, without going into overkill optical theory like you'll find with Nils Olof Carlin. I am sure that these guys know there stuff real well, but I just don't understand it. In fact, I don't _want_ to understand it, I just want to _do_ it. Here are some alternatives... http://www.rfroyce.com/collimat.htm http://www.efn.org/~mbartels/tm/collimat.html (more URLs at the end of this too) Regards, Duane |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Stephen Paul" wrote in message ...
Does anyone have a web page with images like Bryan's, that is more comprehensive on the _process_, without going into overkill optical theory like you'll find with Nils Olof Carlin. I am sure that these guys know there stuff real well, but I just don't understand it. In fact, I don't _want_ to understand it, I just want to _do_ it. Here are some alternatives... http://www.rfroyce.com/collimat.htm http://www.efn.org/~mbartels/tm/collimat.html (more URLs at the end of this too) Regards, Duane |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Stephen Paul" wrote in message ...
Does anyone have a web page with images like Bryan's, that is more comprehensive on the _process_, without going into overkill optical theory like you'll find with Nils Olof Carlin. I am sure that these guys know there stuff real well, but I just don't understand it. In fact, I don't _want_ to understand it, I just want to _do_ it. Here are some alternatives... http://www.rfroyce.com/collimat.htm http://www.efn.org/~mbartels/tm/collimat.html (more URLs at the end of this too) Regards, Duane |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Wfoley2" wrote in message ... That is hear it, not here it. Thanks Bell, my spill checker is broken. g And thanks to all for the links. I've done this too many times to be of good humor when it still doesn't come out right. Hopefully, all I need are better pictures of what we are trying to accomplish in the focuser end. I really don't have any trouble with making the adjustments. It's the racked out big donut that doesn't have the hole on center, that's causing me all the grief. I'll take Bill F's advice, relax and go for it again, using Nils' simplified three steps as shown in the S&T article. Back to the game... -Stephen |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Wfoley2" wrote in message ... That is hear it, not here it. Thanks Bell, my spill checker is broken. g And thanks to all for the links. I've done this too many times to be of good humor when it still doesn't come out right. Hopefully, all I need are better pictures of what we are trying to accomplish in the focuser end. I really don't have any trouble with making the adjustments. It's the racked out big donut that doesn't have the hole on center, that's causing me all the grief. I'll take Bill F's advice, relax and go for it again, using Nils' simplified three steps as shown in the S&T article. Back to the game... -Stephen |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Wfoley2" wrote in message ... That is hear it, not here it. Thanks Bell, my spill checker is broken. g And thanks to all for the links. I've done this too many times to be of good humor when it still doesn't come out right. Hopefully, all I need are better pictures of what we are trying to accomplish in the focuser end. I really don't have any trouble with making the adjustments. It's the racked out big donut that doesn't have the hole on center, that's causing me all the grief. I'll take Bill F's advice, relax and go for it again, using Nils' simplified three steps as shown in the S&T article. Back to the game... -Stephen |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "jerry warner" wrote in message ... newts are much easier than any sct. Easier for you maybe. For me, until the newt secondary is properly aligned, the SCT is easier. -Stephen |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "jerry warner" wrote in message ... newts are much easier than any sct. Easier for you maybe. For me, until the newt secondary is properly aligned, the SCT is easier. -Stephen |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "jerry warner" wrote in message ... newts are much easier than any sct. Easier for you maybe. For me, until the newt secondary is properly aligned, the SCT is easier. -Stephen |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Moon key to space future? | James White | Policy | 90 | January 6th 04 04:29 PM |
Objectives of Collimation | LarryG | Amateur Astronomy | 10 | December 12th 03 04:24 AM |
Reflector collimation question | Joe S. | Amateur Astronomy | 10 | December 8th 03 11:06 PM |
Newtonian secondary collimation (question) | Stephen Paul | Amateur Astronomy | 8 | October 27th 03 03:47 AM |