![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , writes:
In article , wrote: In article , writes: In article , wrote: In article , Mike Simmons writes: Sam Wormley wrote: After years of data the answer from Hubble is 72 km/s/Mpc! I thought the answer to the ultimate question regarding the Universe was 42. It is, in appropriate units. Now you just have to find the units. And the question. It's the question that is the hard part. Exactly. And people don't seem to understand this. Well, they're mostly taught through the process of answering questions presented to them by somebody else. The only way we figured out how to teach it was by demonstration That's always the best way. and most missed the point. You just need the ones who get the point. Mati Meron | "When you argue with a fool, | chances are he is doing just the same" |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , writes:
In article , wrote: In article , writes: In article , wrote: In article , Mike Simmons writes: Sam Wormley wrote: After years of data the answer from Hubble is 72 km/s/Mpc! I thought the answer to the ultimate question regarding the Universe was 42. It is, in appropriate units. Now you just have to find the units. And the question. It's the question that is the hard part. Exactly. And people don't seem to understand this. Well, they're mostly taught through the process of answering questions presented to them by somebody else. The only way we figured out how to teach it was by demonstration That's always the best way. and most missed the point. You just need the ones who get the point. Mati Meron | "When you argue with a fool, | chances are he is doing just the same" |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
wrote: In article , writes: In article , wrote: In article , writes: In article , wrote: In article , Mike Simmons writes: Sam Wormley wrote: After years of data the answer from Hubble is 72 km/s/Mpc! I thought the answer to the ultimate question regarding the Universe was 42. It is, in appropriate units. Now you just have to find the units. And the question. It's the question that is the hard part. Exactly. And people don't seem to understand this. Well, they're mostly taught through the process of answering questions presented to them by somebody else. Yea, I know. I haven't figured out a workaround for that one. The only way we figured out how to teach it was by demonstration That's always the best way. and most missed the point. You just need the ones who get the point. I would like to have a magic incantation that would _identify_ possible candidates. Then I wouldn't have to waste time on the rest of them. /BAH Subtract a hundred and four for e-mail. |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
wrote: In article , writes: In article , wrote: In article , writes: In article , wrote: In article , Mike Simmons writes: Sam Wormley wrote: After years of data the answer from Hubble is 72 km/s/Mpc! I thought the answer to the ultimate question regarding the Universe was 42. It is, in appropriate units. Now you just have to find the units. And the question. It's the question that is the hard part. Exactly. And people don't seem to understand this. Well, they're mostly taught through the process of answering questions presented to them by somebody else. Yea, I know. I haven't figured out a workaround for that one. The only way we figured out how to teach it was by demonstration That's always the best way. and most missed the point. You just need the ones who get the point. I would like to have a magic incantation that would _identify_ possible candidates. Then I wouldn't have to waste time on the rest of them. /BAH Subtract a hundred and four for e-mail. |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
wrote: In article , writes: In article , wrote: In article , writes: In article , wrote: In article , Mike Simmons writes: Sam Wormley wrote: After years of data the answer from Hubble is 72 km/s/Mpc! I thought the answer to the ultimate question regarding the Universe was 42. It is, in appropriate units. Now you just have to find the units. And the question. It's the question that is the hard part. Exactly. And people don't seem to understand this. Well, they're mostly taught through the process of answering questions presented to them by somebody else. Yea, I know. I haven't figured out a workaround for that one. The only way we figured out how to teach it was by demonstration That's always the best way. and most missed the point. You just need the ones who get the point. I would like to have a magic incantation that would _identify_ possible candidates. Then I wouldn't have to waste time on the rest of them. /BAH Subtract a hundred and four for e-mail. |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote in message
news ![]() In article , Mike Simmons writes: Sam Wormley wrote: After years of data the answer from Hubble is 72 km/s/Mpc! I thought the answer to the ultimate question regarding the Universe was 42. It is, in appropriate units. Now you just have to find the units. And the question. I thought it was "What do you get if you multiply 6 by 9", but it only works at (I think) base13. |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote in message
news ![]() In article , Mike Simmons writes: Sam Wormley wrote: After years of data the answer from Hubble is 72 km/s/Mpc! I thought the answer to the ultimate question regarding the Universe was 42. It is, in appropriate units. Now you just have to find the units. And the question. I thought it was "What do you get if you multiply 6 by 9", but it only works at (I think) base13. |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote in message
news ![]() In article , Mike Simmons writes: Sam Wormley wrote: After years of data the answer from Hubble is 72 km/s/Mpc! I thought the answer to the ultimate question regarding the Universe was 42. It is, in appropriate units. Now you just have to find the units. And the question. I thought it was "What do you get if you multiply 6 by 9", but it only works at (I think) base13. |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , writes:
In article , wrote: In article , writes: In article , wrote: In article , writes: In article , wrote: In article , Mike Simmons writes: Sam Wormley wrote: After years of data the answer from Hubble is 72 km/s/Mpc! I thought the answer to the ultimate question regarding the Universe was 42. It is, in appropriate units. Now you just have to find the units. And the question. It's the question that is the hard part. Exactly. And people don't seem to understand this. Well, they're mostly taught through the process of answering questions presented to them by somebody else. Yea, I know. I haven't figured out a workaround for that one. The workaround is called "project". It is when you set student a goal and let him pick the route there. The only way we figured out how to teach it was by demonstration That's always the best way. and most missed the point. You just need the ones who get the point. I would like to have a magic incantation that would _identify_ possible candidates. Then I wouldn't have to waste time on the rest of them. There is no such magic. Getting rid fast of those who don't learn is about the best you can do. Only, it is un-PC. Mati Meron | "When you argue with a fool, | chances are he is doing just the same" |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Clueless pundits (was High-flight rate Medium vs. New Heavy lift launchers) | Rand Simberg | Space Science Misc | 18 | February 14th 04 03:28 AM |
Unofficial Space Shuttle Launch Guide | Steven S. Pietrobon | Space Shuttle | 0 | February 2nd 04 03:33 AM |
New Hubble Space Telescope Exhibit Opens At Goddard | Ron Baalke | Science | 0 | September 30th 03 11:07 PM |
Electric Gravity&Instantaneous Light | ralph sansbury | Astronomy Misc | 8 | August 31st 03 02:53 AM |
News: Hubble plans and policy | Kent Betts | History | 101 | August 18th 03 09:25 PM |