![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() I was really thrilled by the recovery of the Falcon 9 first stage last week. I thought it was the most exciting launch since the first launch of the Space Shuttle Columbia. At the time, I believed NASA which was saying that after an initial development period, the Shuttle program would launch a space ship about once a week. Lots of things would of been different if the Shuttle could have been launched affordably once a week. Now back to SpaceX. Does anyone know what is SpaceX's game plan with a recoverable first stage? They can just keep on as is and increase their profit margin. Or they can try to get more customers by lowering their price. They can also improve their rocket by tearing down the recovered first stage and scanning the pieces to figure out which need to be stronger which could be lighter or what not, that, at least in the short term, probably increases their costs per flight instead of lowering it. I suspect they will do a little bit of each of the above. But does anyone have clues of what they are doing? Is there any sign that they are offering flights for less than before? Alain Fournier |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Live coverage of Falcon 9 first stage recovery attempt? | David Spain[_4_] | Policy | 0 | December 2nd 14 07:02 PM |
First-stage recovery using minimal Delta-v budget: tethered rotor-wings | Brad Guth[_3_] | Policy | 61 | May 9th 14 12:22 PM |
Space shuttle for space tourism and first stage of a TSTO. | Robert Clark | Policy | 169 | March 8th 10 10:03 AM |
Airdrop Test for Space Capsule Recovery Experiment Successfully Conducted(Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | News | 0 | August 30th 04 04:33 AM |
NASA Moves Space Shuttle Columbia Recovery Office | Ron Baalke | Space Shuttle | 0 | October 14th 03 08:11 PM |