![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
bob haller wrote:
caller ID can easily display whatever the caller wants, although I have never wanted to do such a thing Well, no, it can't. And I wish you luck spoofing ANI, which I believe is a crime. ================================================= CALLER ID can easily be spoffed, as anyone who gets tele marketing calls can attest. There was and probably is a web site where for a couple bucks you can spoof caller ID. Had a buddy call me, the system said I called myself.. I dont knnow if ANI can be spoofed, and really it doesnt matter. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Monday, June 30, 2014 10:56:02 PM UTC-4, Fred J. McCall wrote:
bob haller wrote: bob haller wrote: caller ID can easily display whatever the caller wants, although I have never wanted to do such a thing Well, no, it can't. And I wish you luck spoofing ANI, which I believe is a crime. =============================================== == CALLER ID can easily be spoffed, as anyone who gets tele marketing calls can attest. There was and probably is a web site where for a couple bucks you can spoof caller ID. Had a buddy call me, the system said I called myself.. So you claim, but past experience with you indicates that most of what you claim to remember or have seen just turns out to be rather dubious. Hint: Caller ID spoofing is generally illegal in the United States. I dont knnow if ANI can be spoofed, and really it doesnt matter. It does if you're calling me. You'd be dialing into a corporate switchboard that receives ANI info. -- "Some people get lost in thought because it's such unfamiliar territory." --G. Behn most business phone systems come with spoffing ability built in. its commonly used by bill collectors to try and get the person being called to pick up the phone.... |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sunday, July 6, 2014 3:01:13 AM UTC-4, Fred J. McCall wrote:
William Mook wrote: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caller_ID_spoofing "Caller ID spoofing is generally illegal in the United States. The relevant federal statute, the Truth in Caller ID Act of 2009, does make exceptions for certain law-enforcement purposes. Callers are also still allowed to preserve their anonymity by choosing to block all outgoing caller ID information on their phone lines." -- well the websites certinally are not hiding the service. the law must not be followed closely |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sunday, July 6, 2014 12:07:28 PM UTC-4, Fred J. McCall wrote:
bob haller wrote: On Sunday, July 6, 2014 3:01:13 AM UTC-4, Fred J. McCall wrote: William Mook wrote: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caller_ID_spoofing "Caller ID spoofing is generally illegal in the United States. The relevant federal statute, the Truth in Caller ID Act of 2009, does make exceptions for certain law-enforcement purposes. Callers are also still allowed to preserve their anonymity by choosing to block all outgoing caller ID information on their phone lines." well the websites certinally are not hiding the service. the law must not be followed closely Why don't you try breaking the law and see, Bobbert? I suppose that a website pointing out what will kill human beings means that homicide law "must not be followed closely", too, if your name happens to be Bobbert... -- "Some people get lost in thought because it's such unfamiliar territory." --G. Behn Well in the caller ID spoof sites do it for you for a small fee. Fred why dont you put up a site like that and see how long it takes for you to get arrested ![]() A murder anyone for 5 bucks......... |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Monday, July 7, 2014 4:07:28 AM UTC+12, Fred J. McCall wrote:
bob haller wrote: On Sunday, July 6, 2014 3:01:13 AM UTC-4, Fred J. McCall wrote: William Mook wrote: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caller_ID_spoofing "Caller ID spoofing is generally illegal in the United States. The relevant federal statute, the Truth in Caller ID Act of 2009, does make exceptions for certain law-enforcement purposes. Callers are also still allowed to preserve their anonymity by choosing to block all outgoing caller ID information on their phone lines." well the websites certinally are not hiding the service. the law must not be followed closely Why don't you try breaking the law and see, Bobbert? I suppose that a website pointing out what will kill human beings means that homicide law "must not be followed closely", too, if your name happens to be Bobbert... -- "Some people get lost in thought because it's such unfamiliar territory." --G. Behn The rate of intentional homicides is 7.6 per 100,000 - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of..._homicide_rate So, this is a total 541,120 intentional homicides per year at present. This is less than half the death rate due to road traffic which is 18.0 per 100,000 -1,281,600 traffic related deaths per year. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of...ted_death_rate |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Hey just this moment I got a call from card services. Caller ID NEVER shows their name and the caller ID phone number appears random and not a working number... they drone on about calling them press ??? to get no futher calls from them. doing anything appears to increase the number of calls ![]() So Fred, where are the links about proscuetion? Plus it appears that phone solicitors are exempt. They are just very annoying ![]() |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
NASA Safety Panel report released. | Pat Flannery | Policy | 12 | January 26th 10 04:02 AM |
Presidential panel urges NASA overhaul | Andrew Nowicki | Policy | 0 | June 11th 04 08:44 PM |
NASA Names New Safety Advisory Panel | Ron Baalke | Space Shuttle | 0 | November 18th 03 11:23 PM |
Entire NASA Safety Panel Resigns! | Rudolph_X | Astronomy Misc | 14 | September 27th 03 06:13 AM |
NASA Pledges Not to Dispute Shuttle Panel's Proposals | Scott M. Kozel | Policy | 1 | August 6th 03 02:36 AM |