![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
![]() One thing to me is certain though. We need a better less energy wasteful and dangerous way to get off planet. Maybe the physicists can actually find the source of gravity and let us harness the force instead of fighting it. They have, it's called lift! �Lift can get a ship out of the bulk of the atmosphere anyways. I wouldn't be surprised if some sort of air dropped launching ends up being the cheapest and easiet way. YES YES YES, a air launched gigantic airplane air dropping a mini shuttle at the very top of the atmosphere minimizes taking fuel tanks and infrastructure 90% of the way to orbit.. refuel the airplane repeatedly on the way up, to launch release altitude. military can use the same system, and a airliner that could hold a few thousand, or jumbo cargo hauling has advantages too. mean bomber to level a miss behaving country. nice replacement for B52s cruising at 70,000 feet would make shoot downs hard, with precesion guidance to target destrruction. say 5 or 6 times the size of that largest russian plane. only thing is it would rquire dedicated airports for operation |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jonathan" wrote in message ... "The Big DP" wrote in message ... "OM" wrote in message ... On Fri, 5 Feb 2010 10:34:44 -0800, "The Big DP" wrote: Brian....you know that Bob is incapable of a measured OR mature response. Don't you? ...Dougie, where trolls like "jonathan" are concerned, such responses are insufficient and actually have no effect. They're not here for rational discourse, they're here to annoy, harass and otherwise troll. Why many of you refuse to accept this and treat the pathetic maladroit accordingly totally escapes me. OM Well Bobbie....just like with Bob H, or Brad or any of the other folks who annoy me, I can choose to ignore them. It is SO amazingly easy to do that I am surprised a person such as yourself hasn't tried it. It only bugs me when OM doesn't respond. He's a very reliable indicator of whether I hit a 'NASA' nerve or not. And that statement isn't meant as reverse psychology either on OM, it's true. He is a good barometer. Jonathan Jonathan....please I REALLY don't need your support. No offense, but you're a troll. Doug |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "OM" wrote in message ... On Fri, 5 Feb 2010 13:34:25 -0800, "The Big DP" wrote: WHY do you insist on going least common denominator all the time? ...One other thing: Why is it that the only contributions you've made to this group in the past few years are to berate me for trying to chase trolls out of here? A sense of kinship for trolls like "jonathan", perhaps? OM Robert, Defend? Um no, Bob. Here's the deal, dude, I have stated more than once that there's very little of note to contribute by me. I don't have a huge store of material to cull from like say Pat or Scott Lowther or even you, Bob. I COULD be a fan boi and say things like Me, TOO! or cool, dude, or whatever, but that would be tiresome. So, I lurk like I do most groups and just enjoy contributions from most folks. Yeah, Brad Guth usually goes sight unseen because, if for nothing else his sentence structure and his 'interesting' combination of words tire me out. Jonathan is too long winded (like American) and way too much of a conspiracy theory nut job for my taste. Bob Haller I've killed because I am driven to distraction by his crappy typing....and on an on. But, Bob, you're somewhat different. When you aren't ranting and raving about someone or other, you have PLENTY of interesting things to say or you come up with really cool links to things that interest me and the other folks here. That's why I take the time to cajole you because, at least in my viewpoint, YOU are someone of value you here. Yeah, I know, big deal. But, Bob, if I were the only one who felt this way you could consider me a nut job. But, as we both know, I am NOT the only encouraging you to stop your egregious behavior. Hell, Pat's killfiled you for gosh sakes and that seems to really annoy you. Oh and kinship remark was REALLY below the belt....I enjoyed it, but still....... Doug |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Pat Flannery" wrote in message dakotatelephone... The Big DP wrote: Yeah, Brad Guth usually goes sight unseen because, if for nothing else his sentence structure and his 'interesting' combination of words tire me out. I'm still not completely sure he really exists, and isn't just some sort of random word sentence creation computer program. But that's probably because I'm a brown-nosing LLPOF incest-cloned Borg Zionist Nazi. :-D Pat *SNORT* hee hee hee...good one, Pat |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The Big DP wrote:
Yeah, Brad Guth usually goes sight unseen because, if for nothing else his sentence structure and his 'interesting' combination of words tire me out. I'm still not completely sure he really exists, and isn't just some sort of random word sentence creation computer program. But that's probably because I'm a brown-nosing LLPOF incest-cloned Borg Zionist Nazi. :-D Pat |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "OM" wrote in message ... On Mon, 8 Feb 2010 10:51:54 -0800, "The Big DP" wrote: I have stated more than once that there's very little of note to contribute by me. ...Then you don't count, much less have the right to criticize me. Not one word. End of story. PLONK OM I am not surprised....but I am saddened. You Coward! |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Pat Flannery" wrote in message ... The Big DP wrote: Yeah, Brad Guth usually goes sight unseen because, if for nothing else his sentence structure and his 'interesting' combination of words tire me out. I'm still not completely sure he really exists, and isn't just some sort of random word sentence creation computer program. But that's probably because I'm a brown-nosing LLPOF incest-cloned Borg Zionist Nazi. :-D Pat *SNORT* hee hee hee...good one, Pat It took me forever to figure out what the "LLPOF" was all about. It's "Liar, Lier, Pants On Fire"... really hard language on his part. :-D Pat Truth be told Pat....I actually had to ask him. How pathetic is THAT? |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The Big DP wrote:
Yeah, Brad Guth usually goes sight unseen because, if for nothing else his sentence structure and his 'interesting' combination of words tire me out. I'm still not completely sure he really exists, and isn't just some sort of random word sentence creation computer program. But that's probably because I'm a brown-nosing LLPOF incest-cloned Borg Zionist Nazi. :-D Pat *SNORT* hee hee hee...good one, Pat It took me forever to figure out what the "LLPOF" was all about. It's "Liar, Lier, Pants On Fire"... really hard language on his part. :-D Pat |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 20:12:58 -0500, "Jonathan" wrote:
wrote in message ... One thing to me is certain though. We need a better less energy wasteful and dangerous way to get off planet. Maybe the physicists can actually find the source of gravity and let us harness the force instead of fighting it. Let the private corporations figure it out. They're already developing a "rent a shuttle" program for the future. |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Let the private corporations figure it out. They're already developing a "rent a shuttle" program for the future. I doubt anyone will build another shuttle system in any of our lifetimes. Things designed by comitees tend to do nothing really well ![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Obama's Space Policy | LauraM | Policy | 147 | July 23rd 11 11:47 PM |
Barack Obama's Sense of Drift on Space Policy | Mark R. Whittington | Policy | 11 | March 18th 09 04:25 PM |
Barack Obama's Real Space Omission | Quadibloc | Policy | 85 | June 14th 08 09:18 AM |
huge cock big dicks,riding huge dick,free huge dick video | [email protected] | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | March 13th 08 06:40 PM |