The Mirror Universe

http://www.archania.org/entanglement...ng_gravity.jpg

On 5/18/08 9:30 AM Zanthius brightened our day with:
http://www.archania.org/entanglement...ng_gravity.jpg

Why are you cross-posting links to goofball, junk, new-age websites in
science newsgroups. Keep your childish fantasies in the ridiculous
consciousness newsgroups.
If you're looking for some validation, stick with the rest of the nut-jobs.

--
Steve --Inglo--

On 18 Mai, 20:34, LymanAlpha ioo@??.¿¿¿ wrote:
Why are you cross-posting links to goofball, junk, new-age websites in
science newsgroups. Keep your childish fantasies in the ridiculous
consciousness newsgroups.
If you're looking for some validation, stick with the rest of the nut-jobs..

It would be more advantageous if you could give me criticism, after
all, I learn more in that way..

On 18 Mai, 20:34, LymanAlpha ioo@??.¿¿¿ wrote:
If you're looking for some validation, stick with the rest of the nut-jobs..

Tell me why substances have gravity when they have anti-particles, but
if substances are converted into photons they lose their gravity!

Isn't it quite strange that only particles with anti-particles have
any gravity?

Dear Zanthius:

"Zanthius" wrote in message
...
On 18 Mai, 20:34, LymanAlpha ioo@??.¿¿¿ wrote:
If you're looking for some validation, stick with
the rest of the nut-jobs.

Tell me why substances have gravity when
they have anti-particles, but if substances are
converted into photons they lose their gravity!

Photons have anti-particles (other photons). Systems of photons
(that means more than one photon) have rest mass (in their center
of momentum frame). Photons contribute to gravitation.

Isn't it quite strange that only particles with
anti-particles have any gravity?

Isn't it quite strange that any particle has an anti-particle?

I suppose that would apply to gravitons too...

David A. Smith

On 18 Mai, 22:26, "N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)" wrote:
Photons have anti-particles (other photons). Systems of photons
(that means more than one photon) have rest mass (in their center
of momentum frame). Photons contribute to gravitation.

Really? I didn't know. So the if the entire solar system was converted
into photons, it would contribute just as much to gravitation as it
does now?

Isn't it quite strange that any particle has an anti-particle?
I suppose that would apply to gravitons too...

David A. Smith

If gravitons exist, I am sure the anti-gravitons would be in the
gravitational field of the anti-matter.

Dear Zanthius:

"Zanthius" wrote in message
...
On 18 Mai, 22:26, "N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)"
wrote:
Photons have anti-particles (other photons).
Systems of photons (that means more than
one photon) have rest mass (in their center
of momentum frame). Photons contribute to
gravitation.

Really? I didn't know. So the if the entire solar
system was converted into photons, it would
contribute just as much to gravitation as it
does now?

Until the photons were no longer located "inside" the particular
place you are measuring gravitation from.

Isn't it quite strange that any particle has an
anti-particle? I suppose that would apply to
gravitons too...

If gravitons exist, I am sure the anti-gravitons
would be in the gravitational field of the
anti-matter.

No, anti-matter gravitates normally. But if there are
gravitons...

David A. Smith

On May 19, 4:19*am, Zanthius wrote:
On 18 Mai, 20:34, LymanAlpha ioo@??.¿¿¿ wrote:

If you're looking for some validation, stick with the rest of the nut-jobs.

Tell me why substances have gravity when they have anti-particles, but
if substances are converted into photons they lose their gravity!

Isn't it quite strange that only particles with anti-particles have
any gravity?

wha.. microwaved pastie? **** i forgot all abou tit.

On May 19, 12:30*am, Zanthius wrote:
http://www.archania.org/entanglement...ng_gravity.jpg

nice picture. north isn't up its a convention i like to see australia
on top... its whacky but i keep my world map the southside up and try
to think like that.

On May 19, 3:08*am, dead wrote:
On May 19, 12:30*am, Zanthius wrote:

http://www.archania.org/entanglement...ng_gravity.jpg

nice picture. north isn't up its a convention i like to see australia
on top... its whacky but i keep my world map the southside up and try
to think like that.

Correctedit! http://tinypic.com/view.php?pic=2e53vqd&s=3