Nowak's future is clear...

"Nicholas Fitzpatrick" wrote in message
...
In article k.net,
Greg D. Moore \(Strider\) wrote:


But at the end of the day NASA is just her employer and has no right to
dismiss her.

Umm, they have every right to dismiss here. And if she is convicted I can
100% guarantee they will.

She's clearly suffering very classical mental illness symptoms. No
employer would fire someone under these circumstances. And no one would
be convicted of a crime. Mental illness isn't a crime ... This isn't
the third world ...


Mental illness is not a crime. Performing illegal actions very well may be
though.

And she would be released for her criminal acts, not for her mental illness.


Oh hang on, I guess it is kind of the third world down there ... well
she's screwed isn't she ...

Seriously though, it doesn't take much to figure out this is quite likely
related to workplace stress. Presumably even in backward countries, an
employer has still got some responsibility.

Nick

Dave Michelson ) writes:
Andre Lieven wrote:

....

No proof offered ? Fact free claim fails.

....

Does anyone have contact info for Andre's ex?

bg I do, but what of it, I'm married to someone far, far, FAR better
now.

And, she agrees with me on this. So, thats 0-2 on the attempted Ad
Hominem ploy.

Thanks for showing an INABILITY to debate/refute what I wrote.
( " If you can't answer a person's argument, don't worry ! You can
always call him names ! " Oscar Wilde. )

Now, if anyone has some *facts* pertaining to professional mental
health care providers having examined Ms. Nowak, and having then
provided a medical opinion of her actually having a mental illness,
then post that information for us all, please.

Andre

Dave Michelson wrote:


Does anyone have contact info for Andre's ex?

It would be fascinating to hear about, wouldn't it? :-D

Pat

Andre Lieven wrote:
bg I do, but what of it, I'm married to someone far, far, FAR better
now.


Prove it.

Pat

"Pat Flannery" wrote in message
...


Andre Lieven wrote:
bg I do, but what of it, I'm married to someone far, far, FAR better
now.


Prove it.

I think you mean, "No proof offered, claim fails."



Pat

Greg D. Moore (Strider) wrote:

Prove it.


I think you mean, "No proof offered, claim fails."


Prove that's what I wanted to write.
No proof offered? Claim fails.
Yes, the ex's story would be fascinating to hear. :-)

Pat

Pat


Pat

Pat Flannery ) writes:
Dave Michelson wrote:

Does anyone have contact info for Andre's ex?

It would be fascinating to hear about, wouldn't it? :-D

Indeed. And, it would pretty much all be lies.

Thats what one should expect from someone who perjured herself
to both the police and a court of law. ( I dont even have to
prove that as the court decision said it. )

Oh, and as I was there, and no one else here was, that means
that only I know what went on. HTH.

Now, lets figure out why hallerb is a loon, and why OM is a
grouch who makes Don Rickles look positively Mr. Rogersish.

Andre

Pat Flannery ) writes:
Andre Lieven wrote:
bg I do, but what of it, I'm married to someone far, far, FAR better
now.

Prove it.

Give us your phone number. We have an unlimited US/Canada long
distance plan.

Andre

Pat Flannery ) writes:
Andre Lieven wrote:
bg I do, but what of it, I'm married to someone far, far, FAR better
now.

Prove it.

Give us your phone number. We have an unlimited US/Canada long
distance plan.

Andre

Andre Lieven wrote:
Pat Flannery ) writes:

Prove it.

Give us your phone number. We have an unlimited US/Canada long
distance plan.

Pat,

If he asks for your PIN code, call the police :-|

--
Dave Michelson