![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It seems that our trusty moon, of having represented such a forced
global warming mascon to us, is still more off-limits than Venus, whereas Venus is simply need-to-know or Old Testament sequestered for the moment (in mainstream damage-control because Venus simply isn't as old as Earth, and worse yet, we wouldn't be the first to having set a hot foot on Venus). Speaking a little about 'microgravity'; as such it's actually hard to come by unless you're in a fast LEO orbit and therefore having to push yourself through 8 km/s of headwinds (worse yet if you're in retrograde mode), or simply best if you are out and about while literally hanging nearly effortlessly around or rather within our moon's interactive L1 nullification zone. If we're intent upon going for other planets or other moons of such other planets, as such we could really use our moon's L1 for accommodating our next ISS or whatever POOF or Clarke Station. In fact, if we're merely going for our moon it's rather nifty if not essential for having the mission command platform as coasting safely and efficiently at r34 and thereby sustaining a velocity of roughly 866 m/s with respect to Earth, as within this ME-L1 pocket of nearby space that's about as devoid of atoms as it gets. 0) Our moon's L1 isn't a cheap date, nor is it not complex. You'll need more than a good slide rule or pocket calculator if planning upon fully utilizing this nifty interactive space that's so nearby. In other words, all morons and/or the dumb and dumber sorts of snookered fools, especially naysayer's, need not apply. 1) Anything deployed at our moon's L1 starts off small, and it grows to suit. 2) From then on. it only gets as big and/or as complex as you'd like it to get. 3) Because of what this LSE-CM/ISS represents, it's not going to happen overnight. My previously suggested 1e9 m3 CM/ISS abode or space depot that's capable of becoming worth 256e6 tonnes is not an all or nothing sort of super Clarke Station on steroids. For starters, it's simply quite a bit larger, it's placed a wee bit further towards Earth (averaging 60,830 km = 861 km/s to 62,568 km = 856 m/s), as well as it's multi-tethered directly to the moon, and there are a few interactive elements involved. The massive hull or shell of this CM/ISS may or may not have to spin, as there are personal artificial gravity alternatives that would function from within this well shielded environment. The LSE-CM/ISS can eventually reside at the moon's 34r (59,092 km), if not right at L1 once the tether dipole element is extended to within 4r (25,512 km) of Earth. Over time the affect of this installation would somewhat moderate the elliptical lunar orbit and even reduce and/or eliminate the rate of recession, whereas some open mindset folks might tend to think this is a good thing. Besides, I'm absolutely certain that China will know exactly what to do. So, why are so many of you folks getting yourselves so gosh darn huffy or otherwise naysay about all of this? Just because you don't have a masters degree in Chinese Mandarin doesn't mean that we're out of luck. That's because China being smarter than us, as such they'll learn our language (as many already have) in order to accommodate their less fortunate (Mandarin illiterate) clients, such as us. http://www.lpi.usra.edu/publications...aryland01b.pdf This fancy enough "Clarke Station" document that's rather interesting but otherwise seriously outdated, not to mention way under-shielded unless incorporating 8+ meters of water plus having somehow established an artificial magnetosphere, or perhaps 16+ meters of h2o if w/o magnetosphere (all necessary because it's parked within 60,000 km from our physically dark and otherwise highly reactive moon that's providing a not so DNA friendly TBI worth of gamma and hard-X-rays), is simply downright wussy about sharing the positive science and habitat/depot considerations for utilizing the moon's L1. In fact, there's hardly a mention of the tremendous L1 benefits to humanity, much less as to space exploration or the daunting task of salvaging our mascon warmed environment, and it's still not having squat to do with any task of actually developing, exploiting or otherwise terraforming the moon itself. - Brad Guth -- Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
War in Iraq -- Moon on the Moon Hoax -- Proof of Life After Death -- Man as Old as Coal -- Catholic Gospels Corrupt -- Extraterrestrials, UFOs | Ed Conrad | Astronomy Misc | 0 | September 15th 06 01:40 AM |
Of what's become nondisclosure/taboo | Jonathan Silverlight | SETI | 25 | September 22nd 05 11:10 PM |
'Christmas is taboo in America, but now people are fighting back' | Jmpngtiger | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | December 21st 04 12:19 AM |
BLUE MOON IN JULY,search 2x new moon FEB 2052/sky telesc | Don McDonald | Amateur Astronomy | 6 | July 8th 04 03:37 AM |
Will Bush nuke the moon? Will the black hole bomb be tested on the moon first? | Jan Panteltje | Astronomy Misc | 3 | December 6th 03 05:41 PM |