A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Others » UK Astronomy
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Our Taboo/Nondisclosure Moon



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1  
Old November 29th 06, 11:07 PM posted to soc.culture.china,soc.culture.russian,uk.sci.astronomy,rec.org.mensa
Brad Guth[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,941
Default Our Taboo/Nondisclosure Moon

It seems that our trusty moon, of having represented such a forced
global warming mascon to us, is still more off-limits than Venus,
whereas Venus is simply need-to-know or Old Testament sequestered for
the moment (in mainstream damage-control because Venus simply isn't as
old as Earth, and worse yet, we wouldn't be the first to having set a
hot foot on Venus).

Speaking a little about 'microgravity'; as such it's actually hard to
come by unless you're in a fast LEO orbit and therefore having to push
yourself through 8 km/s of headwinds (worse yet if you're in retrograde
mode), or simply best if you are out and about while literally hanging
nearly effortlessly around or rather within our moon's interactive L1
nullification zone.

If we're intent upon going for other planets or other moons of such
other planets, as such we could really use our moon's L1 for
accommodating our next ISS or whatever POOF or Clarke Station. In fact,
if we're merely going for our moon it's rather nifty if not essential
for having the mission command platform as coasting safely and
efficiently at r34 and thereby sustaining a velocity of roughly 866 m/s
with respect to Earth, as within this ME-L1 pocket of nearby space
that's about as devoid of atoms as it gets.

0) Our moon's L1 isn't a cheap date, nor is it not complex. You'll need
more than a good slide rule or pocket calculator if planning upon fully
utilizing this nifty interactive space that's so nearby. In other
words, all morons and/or the dumb and dumber sorts of snookered fools,
especially naysayer's, need not apply.

1) Anything deployed at our moon's L1 starts off small, and it grows to
suit.

2) From then on. it only gets as big and/or as complex as you'd like it
to get.

3) Because of what this LSE-CM/ISS represents, it's not going to happen
overnight.

My previously suggested 1e9 m3 CM/ISS abode or space depot that's
capable of becoming worth 256e6 tonnes is not an all or nothing sort of
super Clarke Station on steroids. For starters, it's simply quite a bit
larger, it's placed a wee bit further towards Earth (averaging 60,830 km
= 861 km/s to 62,568 km = 856 m/s), as well as it's multi-tethered
directly to the moon, and there are a few interactive elements involved.
The massive hull or shell of this CM/ISS may or may not have to spin, as
there are personal artificial gravity alternatives that would function
from within this well shielded environment.

The LSE-CM/ISS can eventually reside at the moon's 34r (59,092 km), if
not right at L1 once the tether dipole element is extended to within 4r
(25,512 km) of Earth. Over time the affect of this installation would
somewhat moderate the elliptical lunar orbit and even reduce and/or
eliminate the rate of recession, whereas some open mindset folks might
tend to think this is a good thing.

Besides, I'm absolutely certain that China will know exactly what to do.
So, why are so many of you folks getting yourselves so gosh darn huffy
or otherwise naysay about all of this?

Just because you don't have a masters degree in Chinese Mandarin doesn't
mean that we're out of luck. That's because China being smarter than
us, as such they'll learn our language (as many already have) in order
to accommodate their less fortunate (Mandarin illiterate) clients, such
as us.

http://www.lpi.usra.edu/publications...aryland01b.pdf
This fancy enough "Clarke Station" document that's rather interesting
but otherwise seriously outdated, not to mention way under-shielded
unless incorporating 8+ meters of water plus having somehow established
an artificial magnetosphere, or perhaps 16+ meters of h2o if w/o
magnetosphere (all necessary because it's parked within 60,000 km from
our physically dark and otherwise highly reactive moon that's providing
a not so DNA friendly TBI worth of gamma and hard-X-rays), is simply
downright wussy about sharing the positive science and habitat/depot
considerations for utilizing the moon's L1. In fact, there's hardly a
mention of the tremendous L1 benefits to humanity, much less as to space
exploration or the daunting task of salvaging our mascon warmed
environment, and it's still not having squat to do with any task of
actually developing, exploiting or otherwise terraforming the moon
itself.
-
Brad Guth


--
Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
War in Iraq -- Moon on the Moon Hoax -- Proof of Life After Death -- Man as Old as Coal -- Catholic Gospels Corrupt -- Extraterrestrials, UFOs Ed Conrad Astronomy Misc 0 September 15th 06 01:40 AM
Of what's become nondisclosure/taboo Jonathan Silverlight SETI 25 September 22nd 05 11:10 PM
'Christmas is taboo in America, but now people are fighting back' Jmpngtiger Amateur Astronomy 0 December 21st 04 12:19 AM
BLUE MOON IN JULY,search 2x new moon FEB 2052/sky telesc Don McDonald Amateur Astronomy 6 July 8th 04 03:37 AM
Will Bush nuke the moon? Will the black hole bomb be tested on the moon first? Jan Panteltje Astronomy Misc 3 December 6th 03 05:41 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:38 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.