Master Mathematician

"maff" wrote in message
oups.com...

Before you reply to this cross-posted thread, do you keep fish and a ponds?
If so, we would love to hear about them. If not, then please remove the
"rec.ponds" NG from your replies to this off-topic cross-posted thread. Our
fish are nonsectarian. :-)

Thank You

Meanwhile here are the FAQ's for your perusal.
rec.pond's FAQ are at:
http://www.geocities.com/justinm090/faq.html


Köi-Lö wrote:

Kepler described the laws of planetary motion in the early 1600's,
and The World Book Encyclopedia noted that these "are used to

Köi-Lö wrote:
Kepler described the laws of planetary motion in the early 1600's,
Because by using these laws, humans can determine by mathematical
calculations where in space a particular body will be at a given time.
That's false.
The Kepler laws only function for two isolated masses.
The efect of Sun on the system Earth-Moon is not counted.
The parabolic orbits of the comets are not included.
Only with complete Newton mechanics can, the path of a satelite, be
computed.
Ludovicus

nightbat wrote

Ips-Switch wrote:

"nightbat" wrote in message
...

nightbat wrote


What does this have to do with ponds and fish keeping?


snip Antonio Santana plagerized text

nightbat

Darla and the Seans reportedly evolving from same.

cheers,
the nightbat

nightbat wrote:
nightbat wrote

Ips-Switch wrote:

"nightbat" wrote in message
...

nightbat wrote


What does this have to do with ponds and fish keeping?


snip Antonio Santana plagerized text

nightbat

Darla and the Seans reportedly evolving from same.

cheers,
the nightbat


I wonder, when they harvest the carp out of their ponds, do they fillet
them or fry them whole?

Double-A

there was some progress with special cases
of the 4-body problem, but the three-body is supposed
to be generally intractable.

Newton is just an algebraization of Kepler;
they're, both, 2-body orbital constraints.

it should be noted, however,
that better models along the lines of Kepler's,
of the nested polyhedra, have been developed,
as published in *21st C. Science and Technology*.

The Kepler laws only function for two isolated masses.
The efect of Sun on the system Earth-Moon is not counted.
The parabolic orbits of the comets are not included.
Only with complete Newton mechanics can, the path of a satelite, be

NB: Gauss didn't bother with Newton's thing for that,
I assume. Newton's "laws" indeed are the two-body problem,
with the proviso that he stole the inverse-second-power "law"
from Hooke, whose portraits were burned by President N.

this just in:
yesterday's (Tues,. Nov.15) *UCLA Daily Bruin* finally noted that
darfur is entirely Muslim, though downplaying it AMAP.

thus:
Dick Cheeny, Don Rumsfeld and Osama bin Latin form a mission
to Darfur, to prevent a war instead of to start one:
if Darfur is "100% Muslim," then
what's really going on, there?
is it just aother British Quag for USA soldiers to get bogged
into, with Iran, Iraq, Afghanistan et al ad vomitorium,
under auspices of the UN and NATO?
why won't the Bruin publish the fact of Islam on the ground,
therein?

thus:
Why doesn't the [UCLA Daily] Bruin report that
Darfur's populace is "100%" Muslim,
according to the DAC's sponsor,
Terry Saunders?...
"99%" was the figure given
by Brian Steidle, when I finally found
him at the Hammer, after everyone else
had left (he, his friend & I were the
very last to leave!)...
What could it possibly mean?

--The Other Side (if it exists)