![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Robert Clark" wrote in
oups.com: Don Lancaster wrote: Eeyore wrote: Robert Clark wrote: For my application I need a hydrogen/oxygen fuel cell to produce the H2O in liquid form. But in addition to the electrical energy, the reaction releases a significant proportion of the energy as heat. Enough heat in fact to turn the H2O released into steam. I know on space missions they use fuel cells to produce liquid water but I assume they use the cryogenic fuels onboard to liquify the water. Is there a way to insure the water released is in liquid form for the H2 and O2 at room temperature? Cool the water vapour. His question shows a profound lack of understanding thermodynamics. He should start with http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Latent_heat http://www.tinaja.com/glib/energfun.pdf Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells. "Hydrogen from the fuel gas stream is consumed at the anode, yielding electrons to the anode and producing hydrogen ions which enter the electrolyte. At the cathode, oxygen combines with electrons from the cathode and hydrogen ions from the electrolyte to produce water. The water does not dissolve in the electrolyte and is, instead, rejected from the back of the cathode into the oxidant gas stream. As the PEFC operates at about 175°F (80°C), the water is produced as liquid water and is carried out of the fuel cell by excess oxidant flow." http://dodfuelcell.cecer.army.mil/proton.html So you have solved your problem, unless I am missing something. Do you not want to use a PEM fuel cell for some reason? Yours, Bill Morse |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Robert Clark" wrote in
ups.com: wrote: ... Batteries would not give you *liquid* water while carrying 1/8th the weight of the water in fuel. That's an important part of my application. Bob Clark Why not just dump the water vapor to the atmosphere (global warming gas! ack! haha) and just load up on liquid water, somewhere else, later on? Otherwise, as someone else mentioned, you have to invest in a heavy, expensive condensing solution (for example, a radiator or heat exchanger). Michael Proton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEFC) might work since they condense the water automatically. From reading some references they appear to have some problem with the liquid water clogging the membranes, impeding hydrogen flow. I want to get as much water exhaust out as possible for my application. Still the PEFC cells might be sufficient for my purposes. I'm sure you can imagine scenarios where neither fresh water nor electrical power is freely available. The commonly stated "8 glasses a day" water per person amounts to 2 liters, or 2 kilos, about 4 1/2 pounds. Over a 10 day trek or a 10 day period without power or fresh water, that would be 45 pounds that would have to be carried along or transported to an effected area per person. There would be significant weight savings if that could be reduced to 5 pounds of hydrogen that had to be carried by each person or transported to an effected area for a large number of people, especially if the hydrogen also could provide electrical power, assuming the fuel cells could be made lightweight. That raises the question, how lightweight can the fuel cells be made per electrical power output, not including the hydrogen? Not very. In almost all environments save space and maybe the Sahara desert, it is easier to get water from local sources and purify it, no matter what the power needs. There are methods for producing water by condensation using day-night differences in temperature in the desert. If weight is an overriding concern and volume is not a problem, you could transport the hydrogen by balloon, and use the balloon to carry the fuel cells - and you could also use the balloon to carry water. To summarize, I am having difficulty in seeing any reason to use fuel cells to produce water. Yours, Bill Morse |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
![]() William Morse wrote: "Robert Clark" wrote in There would be significant weight savings if that could be reduced to 5 pounds of hydrogen that had to be carried by each person or transported to an effected area for a large number of people In almost all environments save space and maybe the Sahara desert, it is easier to get water from local sources and purify it But maybe he plans to fly a zeppelin through the Sahara and throw bodies over board for ballast. Now he has hydrogen to make water and drive those fans against his sails... |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ben Newsam wrote:
On Wed, 16 Aug 2006 22:48:27 GMT, Dan Bloomquist wrote: Robert Clark wrote: Batteries would not give you *liquid* water while carrying 1/8th the weight of the water in fuel. That's an important part of my application. Are you building a space vehicle? I think he is, yes! I do hope he isn't planning on using the power from the fuel cells to drive a great big fan at the back... You put the fan in the front, not the back. First to chop holes in the clouds so the pilot can see. And second to keep the pilot cool. If the fan stops, the pilot immediately starts sweating. http://www.tinaja.com/glib/energfun.pdf -- Many thanks, Don Lancaster voice phone: (928)428-4073 Synergetics 3860 West First Street Box 809 Thatcher, AZ 85552 rss: http://www.tinaja.com/whtnu.xml email: Please visit my GURU's LAIR web site at http://www.tinaja.com |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dan Bloomquist wrote:
Robert Clark wrote: Batteries would not give you *liquid* water while carrying 1/8th the weight of the water in fuel. That's an important part of my application. Are you building a space vehicle? ;-) - Bob |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Converting vapor to liquid releases energy. Power source for
thunderstorms and hurricanes. Don Lancaster wrote: Robert Clark wrote: Eeyore wrote: Robert Clark wrote: For my application I need a hydrogen/oxygen fuel cell to produce the H2O in liquid form. But in addition to the electrical energy, the reaction releases a significant proportion of the energy as heat. Enough heat in fact to turn the H2O released into steam. I know on space missions they use fuel cells to produce liquid water but I assume they use the cryogenic fuels onboard to liquify the water. Is there a way to insure the water released is in liquid form for the H2 and O2 at room temperature? Cool the water vapour. Graham A heat exchanger (radiator) might do it. Or quickly exapnding it into a larger volume. For my application I want the system to be lightweight. Bob Clark You have to recognize that converting water vapor to liquid consumes energy and has to be charged against the fuel cell efficiency budget. Batteries are almost certainly more cost effective. http://www.tinaja.com/glib/energfun.pdf -- Many thanks, Don Lancaster voice phone: (928)428-4073 Synergetics 3860 West First Street Box 809 Thatcher, AZ 85552 rss: http://www.tinaja.com/whtnu.xml email: Please visit my GURU's LAIR web site at http://www.tinaja.com |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Huh?
Robert Clark wrote: G. R. L. Cowan wrote: ... Hydrogen is one-ninth the mass of the water it is in ... but if you want to bring water to somewhere it isn't, 9 kg of it in a 0.5-kg tank beats 1 kg of liquid hydrogen in a 15-to-40-kg tank, even if oxygen is free at the destination. (Very big liquid hydrogen tanks able to contain tens or hundreds of tonnes of it can have more favorable containment-to-payload mass ratios. 15.3 is the lowest I've heard of at car scale, however.) The hydrogen won't be in liquid form otherwise I would have no problem getting the water to liquify. Perhaps mildly pressurized, 4 bar. Bob Clark |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Huh?
Robert Clark wrote: G. R. L. Cowan wrote: ... Hydrogen is one-ninth the mass of the water it is in ... but if you want to bring water to somewhere it isn't, 9 kg of it in a 0.5-kg tank beats 1 kg of liquid hydrogen in a 15-to-40-kg tank, even if oxygen is free at the destination. (Very big liquid hydrogen tanks able to contain tens or hundreds of tonnes of it can have more favorable containment-to-payload mass ratios. 15.3 is the lowest I've heard of at car scale, however.) The hydrogen won't be in liquid form otherwise I would have no problem getting the water to liquify. Perhaps mildly pressurized, 4 bar. Bob Clark |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
dangerdoc wrote:
Huh? Robert Clark wrote: G. R. L. Cowan wrote: ... Hydrogen is one-ninth the mass of the water it is in ... but if you want to bring water to somewhere it isn't, 9 kg of it in a 0.5-kg tank beats 1 kg of liquid hydrogen in a 15-to-40-kg tank, even if oxygen is free at the destination. (Very big liquid hydrogen tanks able to contain tens or hundreds of tonnes of it can have more favorable containment-to-payload mass ratios. 15.3 is the lowest I've heard of at car scale, however.) The hydrogen won't be in liquid form otherwise I would have no problem getting the water to liquify. Perhaps mildly pressurized, 4 bar. Bob Clark I meant using cryogenic liquid hydrogen would make it easy to liquify the water. As noted by Cowan, 4 bar might be too high for a lightweight system. I got this number from high performance fuel cells. They would work at 1 bar just not as efficiently. Bob Clark |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
dangerdoc wrote:
Converting vapor to liquid releases energy. Power source for thunderstorms and hurricanes. Don Lancaster wrote: Robert Clark wrote: Eeyore wrote: Robert Clark wrote: For my application I need a hydrogen/oxygen fuel cell to produce the H2O in liquid form. But in addition to the electrical energy, the reaction releases a significant proportion of the energy as heat. Enough heat in fact to turn the H2O released into steam. I know on space missions they use fuel cells to produce liquid water but I assume they use the cryogenic fuels onboard to liquify the water. Is there a way to insure the water released is in liquid form for the H2 and O2 at room temperature? Cool the water vapour. Graham A heat exchanger (radiator) might do it. Or quickly exapnding it into a larger volume. For my application I want the system to be lightweight. Bob Clark You have to recognize that converting water vapor to liquid consumes energy and has to be charged against the fuel cell efficiency budget. Batteries are almost certainly more cost effective. http://www.tinaja.com/glib/energfun.pdf -- Many thanks, Don Lancaster voice phone: (928)428-4073 Synergetics 3860 West First Street Box 809 Thatcher, AZ 85552 rss: http://www.tinaja.com/whtnu.xml email: Please visit my GURU's LAIR web site at http://www.tinaja.com What I thought I said is not what you think I meant. If the latent energy is "thrown away" such as through a radiator, it has to be charged against the fuel cell efficiency. http://www.tinaja.com/glib/energfun.pdf -- Many thanks, Don Lancaster voice phone: (928)428-4073 Synergetics 3860 West First Street Box 809 Thatcher, AZ 85552 rss: http://www.tinaja.com/whtnu.xml email: Please visit my GURU's LAIR web site at http://www.tinaja.com |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Improved lunar landing architecture | Alex Terrell | Policy | 183 | September 22nd 05 01:32 AM |
Mars Colonization | Remy Villeneuve | Policy | 36 | January 3rd 04 12:07 AM |
Gravitation and Maxwell's Electrodynamics, BOUNDARY CONDITIONS | [email protected] \(formerly\) | Astronomy Misc | 273 | December 28th 03 10:42 PM |
The Measure of Water: NASA Creates New Map for the Atmosphere | Ron Baalke | Science | 0 | December 5th 03 04:57 PM |