Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 6

In article .com,
"don findlay" wrote:

Strike 6:- Another strike, The collapse of the Himalayan edifice over
the Indian Craton
Exactly as Earth Expansion says (only it's not me saying it), and not
at all as Plate Tectonics touts for its "mountain building".


In this post:-
http://groups.google.com.au/group/sc...032e2fb?hl=en&
wrote:
HIMALAYA (Geological Aspects) Volume-4
1. Two orogenic systems in the Himalaya: Evidence and consequences
Jean-Pierre Burg

--------------------------------------------------------
"As a result of the collision of India with Asia1-3, a thick pile of
Precambrian crystalline rocks (the Main Central Sheet) was transported
southwards over the Indian continent." ..... "This suggests that the
kinematic story of the intracontinental deformation following the
continental collision is probably not one of simple north-south
convergence."

On other words, India drove over the Tethys Sea and into Asia, but the collision
was more complex than we thought.


JP Burg in:-
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal.../313388a0.html
--------------------------------------------------------

"A thick pile of crystalline gneiss being transported southwards over
the Indian continent" ...sounds to me more like a southwards-collapsing
Himalayan edifice, rather than crustal crumpling of Asia by an Indian
juggernaut, and consequent uplift.
http://groups.google.com.au/group/sc...70ef3af?hl=en&

http://www.nature.com/nature/journal.../313388a0.html

"As a result of the collision of India with Asia..."

Sounds to me like the continents collided.

Have you written the authors of the article to explain to them that their
assumptions about continental drift and plate tectonics are incorrect, and that
the *collision* of India with Asia was caused by Earth expansion? Could you
explain to us why if things on a sphere that's getting larger are getting
farther apart, India should collide with Asia? How does Expanding Earth explain
that collision?

I'm counting this as strike 6.

You can count it what you like, but geologists who know what they're doing
don't.

--
Timberwoof me at timberwoof dot com http://www.timberwoof.com
If Macintosh is a luxury cruise ship,
then Linux is a freighter with wood paneling in the officers' quarters.

Timberwoof wrote:

On other words, India drove over the Tethys Sea and into Asia, but the collision
was more complex than we thought.

Oh yes, right, ..another shift in goalposts.. Right? (Dickhead.)



JP Burg in:-
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal.../313388a0.html
--------------------------------------------------------

"A thick pile of crystalline gneiss being transported southwards over
the Indian continent" ...sounds to me more like a southwards-collapsing
Himalayan edifice, rather than crustal crumpling of Asia by an Indian
juggernaut, and consequent uplift.
http://groups.google.com.au/group/sc...70ef3af?hl=en&

http://www.nature.com/nature/journal.../313388a0.html

"As a result of the collision of India with Asia..."

Sounds to me like the continents collided.

I know, ..It's amazing you can get about in the world, mate, .. with
the cacophany of it all assaulting you..


Have you written the authors of the article to explain to them that their
assumptions about continental drift and plate tectonics are incorrect,

There's no need. They're about to get full web exposure for their
remarkably *hard-work* fluent illustration dedicated to getting
everybody on-side without even having to read their paper - namely
their first sentence. Obviously the point of that, summarising their
entire premise without even having to state it, was lost on you lot.
(Bunch of swallowers.)

and that
the *collision* of India with Asia was caused by Earth expansion? Could you
explain to us why if things on a sphere that's getting larger are getting
farther apart, India should collide with Asia? How does Expanding Earth explain
that collision?

Hou much of an idiot can you be, woof, ..Can you not understand the
point, ..it never collided at all, ..Or read? It's the Himalayas
collapsing over Asia you're looking at. Your trouble is your live in a
world of relatives. You have to learn to stand on your OWN feet.


I'm counting this as strike 6.

You can count it what you like, but geologists who know what they're doing
don't.

"..Don't count.." I know, ..and think that's worth an extra 2, 'coz
they can't even read either.


--
Timberwoof me at timberwoof dot com http://www.timberwoof.com
If Macintosh is a luxury cruise ship,
then Linux is a freighter with wood paneling in the officers' quarters.

In article .com,
"don findlay" wrote:

Timberwoof wrote:

On other words, India drove over the Tethys Sea and into Asia, but the
collision
was more complex than we thought.

Oh yes, right, ..another shift in goalposts.. Right? (Dickhead.)



JP Burg in:-
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal.../313388a0.html
--------------------------------------------------------

"A thick pile of crystalline gneiss being transported southwards over
the Indian continent" ...sounds to me more like a southwards-collapsing
Himalayan edifice, rather than crustal crumpling of Asia by an Indian
juggernaut, and consequent uplift.
http://groups.google.com.au/group/sc...63470ef3af?hl=
en&

http://www.nature.com/nature/journal.../313388a0.html

"As a result of the collision of India with Asia..."

Sounds to me like the continents collided.

I know, ..It's amazing you can get about in the world, mate, .. with
the cacophany of it all assaulting you..


Have you written the authors of the article to explain to them that their
assumptions about continental drift and plate tectonics are incorrect,

There's no need. They're about to get full web exposure for their
remarkably *hard-work* fluent illustration dedicated to getting
everybody on-side without even having to read their paper - namely
their first sentence. Obviously the point of that, summarising their
entire premise without even having to state it, was lost on you lot.
(Bunch of swallowers.)

and that
the *collision* of India with Asia was caused by Earth expansion? Could you
explain to us why if things on a sphere that's getting larger are getting
farther apart, India should collide with Asia? How does Expanding Earth
explain
that collision?

Hou much of an idiot can you be, woof, ..Can you not understand the
point, ..it never collided at all, ..Or read? It's the Himalayas
collapsing over Asia you're looking at. Your trouble is your live in a
world of relatives. You have to learn to stand on your OWN feet.

So instead of listening to geologists who know what they're talking
about and basing my thoughts on what hey say, I should listen to you
instead, right?




I'm counting this as strike 6.

You can count it what you like, but geologists who know what they're doing
don't.

"..Don't count.." I know, ..and think that's worth an extra 2, 'coz
they can't even read either.

Let me see now. You're smarter than thousands of geologists. Okay. Sure.
You go on believing that. It may be good therapy.

--
Timberwoof me at timberwoof dot com http://www.timberwoof.com

In message ,
Timberwoof writes
In article .com,
"don findlay" wrote:

http://www.nature.com/nature/journal.../313388a0.html

"As a result of the collision of India with Asia..."

Sounds to me like the continents collided.

Have you written the authors of the article to explain to them that their
assumptions about continental drift and plate tectonics are incorrect,
and that
the *collision* of India with Asia was caused by Earth expansion? Could you
explain to us why if things on a sphere that's getting larger are getting
farther apart, India should collide with Asia? How does Expanding Earth
explain
that collision?

IIRC, Don doesn't believe that the collision is happening - the
Himalayas are all too flat.
I'm surprised he hasn't used the analogy of colliding galaxies in an
expanding universe, but perhaps he's aware that if the plates undergo
motion separate from expansion you don't actually need expansion (hope
that makes sense !)

"don findlay" wrote in message
oups.com...

crap deleted

Will you please just go away?

Gerry Murphy wrote:
"don findlay" wrote in message
oups.com...

crap deleted

Will you please just go away?

Well, ...what a polite request.. what do you mean, "crap" I certainly
agree it's crap, but it's not my crap. You just lost a strike -credit
for scoring an own-goal. Or are you bothered about talk origins'
dedication to talking about life not getting talked about? Don't you
know there's life sitting up on top of the Roof of the World? Enjoying
some "Isostatic Rebound" - ...a whole 8km of it... As well as
some origin. That's surely worth a some talk

"don findlay" wrote in message
oups.com...

Gerry Murphy wrote:
"don findlay" wrote in message
oups.com...

crap deleted

Will you please just go away?

Well, ...what a polite request.. what do you mean, "crap" I certainly
agree it's crap, but it's not my crap. You just lost a strike -credit
for scoring an own-goal. Or are you bothered about talk origins'
dedication to talking about life not getting talked about? Don't you
know there's life sitting up on top of the Roof of the World? Enjoying
some "Isostatic Rebound" - ...a whole 8km of it... As well as
some origin. That's surely worth a some talk

plonk