![]() |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Pat Flannery wrote:
While I disagree with IDers, a belief in it isn't the same as believing the earth is flat. Nothing like hitching your cart to a falling star... Don't look now, but the other shoe has just started to fall: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/12774274/site/newsweek/ Not that it's in any way on topic, but it's hard (and amusing) to imagine why anyone would think this has any news value, except those in the advanced stages of Bush Derangement Syndrome. No one should be surprised that there was discussion in the White House about why serial liar Joe Wilson was sent to Niger. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Rand Simberg wrote:
Not that it's in any way on topic, but it's hard (and amusing) to imagine why anyone would think this has any news value, except those in the advanced stages of Bush Derangement Syndrome. No one should be surprised that there was discussion in the White House about why serial liar Joe Wilson was sent to Niger. Two questions come immediately to mind: 1.) Why didn't Cheney shred this little item the moment the whole Plame affair hit the fan? Was it in someone else's possession? 2.) How exactly did the investigators get their hands on it? Who gave it to them? Libby? Rove? Goss? Foggo? Cheney himself? (that wouldn't make much sense, as he'd be writing notes to himself; this apparently was given to somebody fairly high up.) Pat |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Pat Flannery wrote:
Rand Simberg wrote: Not that it's in any way on topic, but it's hard (and amusing) to imagine why anyone would think this has any news value, except those in the advanced stages of Bush Derangement Syndrome. No one should be surprised that there was discussion in the White House about why serial liar Joe Wilson was sent to Niger. Two questions come immediately to mind: 1.) Why didn't Cheney shred this little item the moment the whole Plame affair hit the fan? Was it in someone else's possession? Perhaps because there's nothing wrong, or incriminating about it? 2.) How exactly did the investigators get their hands on it? Who gave it to them? Libby? Rove? Goss? Foggo? Cheney himself? (that wouldn't make much sense, as he'd be writing notes to himself; this apparently was given to somebody fairly high up.) What difference does it make? |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Rand Simberg wrote:
2.) How exactly did the investigators get their hands on it? Who gave it to them? Libby? Rove? Goss? Foggo? Cheney himself? (that wouldn't make much sense, as he'd be writing notes to himself; this apparently was given to somebody fairly high up.) It was Libby BTW. Pat |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Pat Flannery wrote:
2.) How exactly did the investigators get their hands on it? Who gave it to them? Libby? Rove? Goss? Foggo? Cheney himself? (that wouldn't make much sense, as he'd be writing notes to himself; this apparently was given to somebody fairly high up.) It was Libby BTW. Who cares? |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Pat Flannery wrote:
2.) How exactly did the investigators get their hands on it? Who gave it to them? Libby? Rove? Goss? Foggo? Cheney himself? (that wouldn't make much sense, as he'd be writing notes to himself; this apparently was given to somebody fairly high up.) It was Libby BTW. To repeat, who cares? http://www.canadafreepress.com/2006/burtis051606.htm |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Rand Simberg wrote:
To repeat, who cares? http://www.canadafreepress.com/2006/burtis051606.htm Oh, I imagine Libby does; I think he wants to say "thank you" to his good friends who left him holding the bag. Nifty paper BTW: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canada_Free_Press I particularly liked the plagiarized Onion story, and how the Mafia was behind 9/11: http://www.canadafreepress.com/2005/cover071105.htm ....as part of a gambling scheme. BUT WHAT ABOUT THE FREEMASONIC CHEMTRAILS ON 9/11?????? As for the completely fabricated stories, well...everyone has to make stuff up now and then, don't they? AT LEAST THOSE UNDER FREEMASONIC CHEMTRAIL CONTROL!!!! :-D Pat |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 09 May 2006 11:23:52 -0400, in a place far, far away, Pat
Flannery made the phosphor on my monitor glow in such a way as to indicate that: Fred J. McCall wrote: Oddly, nobody who actually knows him or has met him thinks he's stupid. This sort of thing is how your lot keep getting waxed by him in elections. And those poll numbers were what at the moment? What do poll numbers have to do with how smart someone is? Lincoln would have had terrible poll numbers in early 1864, if polls had existed. |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Rand Simberg wrote:
What do poll numbers have to do with how smart someone is? Lincoln would have had terrible poll numbers in early 1864, if polls had existed. Truman had terrible poll numbers due to Korea; Bush has terrible poll numbers due to Iraq. Was invading Iraq a smart thing to do? No, it was a stupid thing to do...but he did it anyway. Therefore he may be stupid. I notice that this time you didn't cite any Canada Free Press articles to the contrary, which is a pity, as enquiring minds want to know more about the Kofi Annan Freemasonic link: http://www.canadafreepress.com/2006/cover020706.htm "Even though it has more than 6 million members worldwide, Freemasonry and what it stands for is something not readily understood by the chattering classes. One needs the time and patience to go back through history to ever begin to understand the intrigues of this all-boy organization. According to Freemasons, Illuminati and Associates, "Freemasonry is the largest international secret society in the world.'The highest degree of the Scottish rite of Freemasonry, the Meritorious Degree, the Degree of the Illuminati, whose motto is "Ordo Ab Chao", or "Out of Chaos comes order"-which literally means if they break down the existing structure and cause the population to cry out for order, they will emerge as rulers and have the world that they seek.' How many politicians create havoc only to jump in and save us right around election time? Interesting to note that many of the estimated six million Free Masons occupy leadership positions around the world. Almost as interesting to note that some conspiracy types swear that the main agenda of the United Nations is for One World Order." I like the "chattering classes" part; that's a turn of phrase you yourself could have come up with. I also get a kick out of the Freemasons being an "all-boy organization", as there are female Freemasons in the Order Of the Eastern Star, Job's Daughters, and Rainbows, which around five minutes of research would have shown the author of the article. Pat |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 19 May 2006 07:55:51 -0400, in a place far, far away, Pat
Flannery made the phosphor on my monitor glow in such a way as to indicate that: What do poll numbers have to do with how smart someone is? Lincoln would have had terrible poll numbers in early 1864, if polls had existed. Truman had terrible poll numbers due to Korea; Bush has terrible poll numbers due to Iraq. Bush has terrible poll numbers due to lots of things. Immigration and overspending among them. Was invading Iraq a smart thing to do? Yes. No, it was a stupid thing to do...but he did it anyway. You're certainly entitled to your stupid opinions. Others' mileage varies. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Space Calendar - November 26, 2003 | Ron Baalke | History | 2 | November 28th 03 09:21 AM |
Space Calendar - November 26, 2003 | Ron Baalke | Astronomy Misc | 1 | November 28th 03 09:21 AM |
Space Calendar - November 26, 2003 | Ron Baalke | Misc | 1 | November 28th 03 09:21 AM |
Space Calendar - October 24, 2003 | Ron Baalke | Astronomy Misc | 0 | October 24th 03 04:38 PM |
Space Calendar - October 24, 2003 | Ron Baalke | Misc | 0 | October 24th 03 04:38 PM |