![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote:
Michael Baldwin, Bruce wrote in message oups.com... Carl Osterwald did not write this: Art Deco wrote: Sean Monaghan wrote: For this fine display of cluelessness, I nominate A-A for Clueless Newbie of the Month. Seconds? This nomination is refused. Voters (no matter who they are) who follow the rules should not become candidates for kook awards based on how they vote (no matter how they choose to vote). Voters are free to vote in any way they so desire, even if it amounts to *voting against* almost the entire ballot[1a] [1b]. [1a] http://groups.google.com/group/alt.u...9f69c7603fb37a [1b] http://groups.google.com/group/alt.u...7eb1a252022d3c Very well then, I stand corrected. What intelligent person really gives a Ratz ass about this childish bull****? Quiet, k0oks. -- ah |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
![]() ah wrote in message ... wrote: Michael Baldwin, Bruce wrote in message oups.com... Carl Osterwald did not write this: Art Deco wrote: Sean Monaghan wrote: For this fine display of cluelessness, I nominate A-A for Clueless Newbie of the Month. Seconds? This nomination is refused. Voters (no matter who they are) who follow the rules should not become candidates for kook awards based on how they vote (no matter how they choose to vote). Voters are free to vote in any way they so desire, even if it amounts to *voting against* almost the entire ballot[1a] [1b]. [1a] http://groups.google.com/group/alt.u...9f69c7603fb37a [1b] http://groups.google.com/group/alt.u...7eb1a252022d3c Very well then, I stand corrected. What intelligent person really gives a Ratz ass about this childish bull****? Quiet, k0oks. Thank you, sir. May I have another? |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
![]() ah wrote in message ... Art Deco wrote: Archive: YES Archie Leach wrote: wrote: Art Deco wrote in message ... Sean Monaghan wrote: For this fine display of cluelessness, I nominate A-A for Clueless Newbie of the Month. Seconds? This nomination is refused. Voters (no matter who they are) who follow the rules should not become candidates for kook awards based on how they vote (no matter how they choose to vote). Voters are free to vote in any way they so desire, even if it amounts to *voting against* almost the entire ballot[1a] [1b]. [1a] http://groups.google.com/group/alt.u...9f69c7603fb37a [1b] http://groups.google.com/group/alt.u...7eb1a252022d3c Very well then, I stand corrected, cockslapped across my diseased lips and white jizz filled moustache! Did it hurt much? Further evidence of the oppressed kook-award-winning-minority being brutally harassed by "The StAUKer Cabal". Honest John really knows what a "total loser" I really am! Fart, you are a loser! Good man! Archive: yes |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote:
ah wrote in message ... wrote: Michael Baldwin, Bruce wrote in message oups.com... Carl Osterwald did not write this: Art Deco wrote: Sean Monaghan wrote: For this fine display of cluelessness, I nominate A-A for Clueless Newbie of the Month. Seconds? This nomination is refused. Voters (no matter who they are) who follow the rules should not become candidates for kook awards based on how they vote (no matter how they choose to vote). Voters are free to vote in any way they so desire, even if it amounts to *voting against* almost the entire ballot[1a] [1b]. [1a] http://groups.google.com/group/alt.u...9f69c7603fb37a [1b] http://groups.google.com/group/alt.u...7eb1a252022d3c Very well then, I stand corrected. What intelligent person really gives a Ratz ass about this childish bull****? Quiet, k0oks. Thank you, sir. May I have another? Quiet, ko0k. -- ah |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
![]() ah wrote in message ... wrote: ah wrote in message ... wrote: Michael Baldwin, Bruce wrote in message oups.com... Carl Osterwald did not write this: Art Deco wrote: Sean Monaghan wrote: For this fine display of cluelessness, I nominate A-A for Clueless Newbie of the Month. Seconds? This nomination is refused. Voters (no matter who they are) who follow the rules should not become candidates for kook awards based on how they vote (no matter how they choose to vote). Voters are free to vote in any way they so desire, even if it amounts to *voting against* almost the entire ballot[1a] [1b]. [1a] http://groups.google.com/group/alt.u...9f69c7603fb37a [1b] http://groups.google.com/group/alt.u...7eb1a252022d3c Very well then, I stand corrected. What intelligent person really gives a Ratz ass about this childish bull****? Quiet, k0oks. Thank you, sir. May I have another? Quiet, ko0k. Thank you, sir. May I have another? |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
![]() ah wrote in message ... wrote: ah wrote in message ... Art Deco wrote: Archive: YES Archie Leach wrote: wrote: Art Deco wrote in message ... Sean Monaghan wrote: For this fine display of cluelessness, I nominate A-A for Clueless Newbie of the Month. Seconds? This nomination is refused. Voters (no matter who they are) who follow the rules should not become candidates for kook awards based on how they vote (no matter how they choose to vote). Voters are free to vote in any way they so desire, even if it amounts to *voting against* almost the entire ballot[1a] [1b]. [1a] http://groups.google.com/group/alt.u...9f69c7603fb37a [1b] http://groups.google.com/group/alt.u...7eb1a252022d3c Very well then, I stand corrected, cockslapped across my diseased lips and white jizz filled moustache! Did it hurt much? Further evidence of the oppressed kook-award-winning-minority being brutally harassed by "The StAUKer Cabal". Honest John really knows what a "total loser" I really am! Fart, you are a loser! Good man! Archive: yes Don't you have a bowel movement you need to attend to? That was this morning, where were you? |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
ah wrote:
wrote: ah wrote in message ... Art Deco wrote: Archive: YES Archie Leach wrote: wrote: Art Deco wrote in message .. . Sean Monaghan wrote: For this fine display of cluelessness, I nominate A-A for Clueless Newbie of the Month. Seconds? This nomination is refused. Voters (no matter who they are) who follow the rules should not become candidates for kook awards based on how they vote (no matter how they choose to vote). Voters are free to vote in any way they so desire, even if it amounts to *voting against* almost the entire ballot[1a] [1b]. [1a] http://groups.google.com/group/alt.u...9f69c7603fb37a [1b] http://groups.google.com/group/alt.u...7eb1a252022d3c Very well then, I stand corrected, cockslapped across my diseased lips and white jizz filled moustache! Did it hurt much? Further evidence of the oppressed kook-award-winning-minority being brutally harassed by "The StAUKer Cabal". Honest John really knows what a "total loser" I really am! Fart, you are a loser! Good man! Archive: yes Don't you have a bowel movement you need to attend to? What happen to ah Verizon? He get booted, like his little buddy Aratzio? :-) Uni |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote:
ah wrote in message ... wrote: ah wrote in message ... wrote: Michael Baldwin, Bruce wrote in message oups.com... Carl Osterwald did not write this: Art Deco wrote: Sean Monaghan wrote: For this fine display of cluelessness, I nominate A-A for Clueless Newbie of the Month. Seconds? This nomination is refused. Voters (no matter who they are) who follow the rules should not become candidates for kook awards based on how they vote (no matter how they choose to vote). Voters are free to vote in any way they so desire, even if it amounts to *voting against* almost the entire ballot[1a] [1b]. [1a] http://groups.google.com/group/alt.u...9f69c7603fb37a [1b] http://groups.google.com/group/alt.u...7eb1a252022d3c Very well then, I stand corrected. What intelligent person really gives a Ratz ass about this childish bull****? Quiet, k0oks. Thank you, sir. May I have another? Quiet, ko0k. Thank you, sir. May I have another? Quiet, k0ok. -- ah |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
![]() ah wrote in message ... wrote: ah wrote in message ... wrote: ah wrote in message ... wrote: Michael Baldwin, Bruce wrote in message oups.com... Carl Osterwald did not write this: Art Deco wrote: Sean Monaghan wrote: For this fine display of cluelessness, I nominate A-A for Clueless Newbie of the Month. Seconds? This nomination is refused. Voters (no matter who they are) who follow the rules should not become candidates for kook awards based on how they vote (no matter how they choose to vote). Voters are free to vote in any way they so desire, even if it amounts to *voting against* almost the entire ballot[1a] [1b]. [1a] http://groups.google.com/group/alt.u...9f69c7603fb37a [1b] http://groups.google.com/group/alt.u...7eb1a252022d3c Very well then, I stand corrected. What intelligent person really gives a Ratz ass about this childish bull****? Quiet, k0oks. Thank you, sir. May I have another? - Animal House. Quiet, ko0k. Thank you, sir. May I have another? Quiet, k0ok. Thank you, sir. May I have another? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
VOTE! Usenet Kook Awards, December 2005 | Double-A | Misc | 0 | January 2nd 06 04:00 AM |
VOTE! Usenet Kook Awards, November 2005 | Double-A | Misc | 0 | December 3rd 05 07:31 AM |
NOMINATION: digest, volume 2453397 | Ross | Astronomy Misc | 233 | October 23rd 05 04:24 AM |
Fw: VOTE! Usenet Kook Awards, September 2005 | Double-A | Misc | 13 | October 3rd 05 04:56 AM |
Vote! Official Usenet Kook Awards, April 2004 | Carl R. Osterwald | Astronomy Misc | 14 | May 7th 04 06:41 AM |