![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Alright "einstein" or should I say "dr" sniker You show me the moron
that's going to shine a 5mw. GLP point- blank into his eyeball for the length of time that it is going to take to do any damage and I'll show you the same idiot that would prop his eyes open with a toothpick and stare directly into the sun. Who the hell in his right mind would do that? Get real! ... "well it might happen right"? sheesh! Were talking about the b.s. that went on over the guy that shined a GLP on an airplane. In the first place a 5mw. GLP has NO detremental effect at those distances whatsoever. The power generated demenishes greatly with distance. The whole story was a bunch of hogwash blown out of proportion! Now if your talking about a GLP 5mw. then you have an argument. But those GLP's are not available to the general public so you really don't have much of an argument do you. Glp's of that power range are reserved for research, the military and the like. You sound like the kind of person that reads one article on something and suddenly thinks he's an expert! "rcyoung" wrote in message oups.com... Sorry to disappoint, but they "can"...note the operative word here "CAN" be dangerous...just like anything else. Wavelength and length of exposure (and of course, the wattage rating) are the key to whether they can cause any discomfort, temporary, or permanent damage. Dr. Robert Young |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Chris L Peterson wrote:
Banning GLPs at star parties because you don't have responsible attendees is attacking the wrong problem, IMO. Chris, How's the weather there in Shangrala ? Must be perfect eh ? Either that or you simply don't get out much. GLP's *will* be misused at Star Parties until (and probably even after) they are banned. Because it's simply human nature. Any pastime such as Amateur Astronomy attracts geeks. And geeks need to have their little toys. The last Star Party I was at, Oki-Tex 2003 it was common place for the Astro-Brats to play green laser tag along the cliffs surrounding the observing area. One of them got carried away and the beam bounced off a polished Stainless Steel Airstream Motorhome directly into my left eye leaving it useless for *hours* afterwards. Oh sure ... I am aware that it was probably "pumped up" but after getting nailed with one how are you going to find the culprit in the crowd and rectally implant the thing ? The fact that you like GLP's has clouded your judgement on this one. By "aesthetics" I was referring to the appearance of lasers in the sky. The beams have no impact on visual observers or imagers This is absolute nonsense. You do understand photography and how it works don't you ? If you can see it then it can be photographed. And the mere fact is, irresponsible use of the latest fad toy will not save a one hour manually guided film image from being hopelessly ruined. Furthermore the imager is likely to not know it till it gets developed. Oh I understand that since you use CCD you seem to be blissfully unaware that many people still use film. And many of them use fast optical systems and or Widefield lenses. Just the type that would be most affected by GLP's and other forms of light pollution. And before you bring up the most used defense to this ........ I have seen actual images that were ruined and they are not pretty. And they were done as an experiment by Jason Ware to prove this point. That GLP's are indeed a form of light pollution and have no value in *any* Star Party environment. Unless said venue allows Car Headlights too. Then I suppose it doesn't matter. , and if you are in a good site they will be nearly invisible. Wow .... mag 8.0 skies, no moon, or clouds and zero percent humidity there in Shangrala eh Chris ? Can I buy the lot next to you and play with a GLP and see how quickly you change your tune ? laughs But many star parties are not held at very good sites, and the appearance of green lines in the sky may detract from the overall experience for some people. That is a valid reason to place some limitations on GLP usage. Finally something that makes some sense. Yes. They need to be banned. Any Star Party worth a damn will do so because to not do so will hurt attendance. And in case you were wondering ? No I don't own one. laughs I can actually read a star chart and use an 8x50 finder. Bill -- William R. Mattil : http://www.celestial-images.com |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 22 Sep 2005 21:33:09 GMT, "William R. Mattil"
wrote: How's the weather there in Shangrala ? Must be perfect eh ? Either that or you simply don't get out much. GLP's *will* be misused at Star Parties until (and probably even after) they are banned. Because it's simply human nature. Sorry, I disagree. I don't see any evidence that GLPs are being routinely abused, any more than flashlights. A well run star party should be able to enforce its rules- and those rules can include the way GLPs are used. If the organizers can't enforce usage, how can they enforce a ban? By "aesthetics" I was referring to the appearance of lasers in the sky. The beams have no impact on visual observers or imagers This is absolute nonsense. You do understand photography and how it works don't you ? If you can see it then it can be photographed. I say this because I have experimented. And yes, I do understand how photography and imaging work. They work by integrating light, and GLP beams aren't much brighter than bright DSOs. A beam passing across an imaging field will not affect the image. I found that in order for a GLP to have any effect (as measured by a reduced S/N) it needs to be located within around 50 feet of the imaging scope, and maintained on the same target for more than a minute. The only way this could happen would be for someone to be using a GLP as a telescope finder- something that I do think should not be allowed at most star parties. And before you bring up the most used defense to this ........ I have seen actual images that were ruined and they are not pretty. And they were done as an experiment by Jason Ware to prove this point. I'll believe it when I see it, along with details of the experiment. Film is so pathetically low sensitivity I find it hard to believe it could be affected if CCD images aren't. Wow .... mag 8.0 skies, no moon, or clouds and zero percent humidity there in Shangrala eh Chris ? Can I buy the lot next to you and play with a GLP and see how quickly you change your tune ? laughs Sure, you are more than welcome. I can tell you that most of the time, I can't see my GLP from more than 20 feet away (and mine is 12mW, which I need for classes since you can't see a 5mW beam at all from 10 feet). But many star parties are not held at very good sites, and the appearance of green lines in the sky may detract from the overall experience for some people. That is a valid reason to place some limitations on GLP usage. Finally something that makes some sense. Yes. They need to be banned. Any Star Party worth a damn will do so because to not do so will hurt attendance. I didn't say banned. I said they need to have limitations. That means rules. Things like where on the field they can be used, and when. And in case you were wondering ? No I don't own one. laughs I can actually read a star chart and use an 8x50 finder. Which has nothing to do with the most reasonable use of a GLP- teaching. There is nothing that comes close to a GLP for that purpose. And IMO, education is (and should be) a primary function of most star parties. _________________________________________________ Chris L Peterson Cloudbait Observatory http://www.cloudbait.com |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wow, trying to be sarcastic and you just sound unbelievably arrogant.
And in case you were wondering ? No I don't own one. laughs I can actually read a star chart and use an 8x50 finder. Bill -- William R. Mattil : http://www.celestial-images.com |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
For a really blatant use of two green laser pointers, check out this
image: http://www.ocastronomers.org/astroim...%20Photographs But I usually only use mine at astronomy outreaches, not at star parties Matthew Ota |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I feekl so much secure now!
Esmail Bonakdarian wrote: Sam Wormley wrote: I use green laser pointer with my community college students most class nights we are out. I think they are great tools for showing novices the constellations and the night sky (different from use for a finder). None of hand-waving, and "see just there by the tree,above the power line" type descriptions for pointing out objects. Should be handled properly, and there should be no worry. |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Matthew Ota wrote:
For a really blatant use of two green laser pointers, check out this image: http://www.ocastronomers.org/astroim...%20Photographs But I usually only use mine at astronomy outreaches, not at star parties Very illustrative image - thanks. So you had someone "paint" you first with a laser, and then you pointed at Mars right? |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
This is correct....
|
#29
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yermiah wrote:
Sam Wormley wrote: I use green laser pointer with my community college students most class nights we are out. I think they are great tools for showing novices the constellations and the night sky (different from use for a finder). None of hand-waving, and "see just there by the tree,above the power line" type descriptions for pointing out objects. Should be handled properly, and there should be no worry. I feekl so much secure now! It's spelled *fecal*, and what the hell are you talking about? ;-) Shawn |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Where's Del Johnson when you need him?
Jim Wayda wrote: Do you guys still use green laser pointers? I have been paranoid ever since some idiot got arrested several years ago for pointing a laser pointer at a plane... |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
NOMINATION: digest, volume 2453397 | Ross | Astronomy Misc | 233 | October 23rd 05 04:24 AM |
Green laser pointers on telescopes | callisto | Amateur Astronomy | 22 | September 23rd 05 07:46 AM |
Flash Blinded By Green Laser | Gary Honis | Amateur Astronomy | 136 | January 29th 05 04:09 AM |
More on Green Laser Concerns.... | Ted Nichols II | Amateur Astronomy | 8 | January 5th 05 06:06 PM |
Laser lunacy | Tim Killian | Amateur Astronomy | 30 | January 4th 05 04:58 AM |