![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Depending on the wavelength, a 40mm telescope-camera at 300 miles
altitude will have a resolution of about fifteen feet per pixel, and on an HD tv will cover an area about three miles across, when looking straight down. The circle of its horizon will be about 1500 miles across. The resolution will drop by half near the horizon but the area will more than double. To cover the entire area visible to the satellite would take over a thousand such cameras. A cluster of say fifty sat-cams on a single platform could be controlled induvidually by operators using a joy stick or a VR headset and paying perhaps two or three dollars a minute, or a point on the earth could tracked, selected by a pointer or GPS coordinates. The time a position could be tracked before it dissappeared over the horizon could be as long as five minutes. The appearance of a place on earth can vary by season, time of day, angle of observation and cloud cover. Real time reception of a very low power signal could be possible with a tracking dish that would cost within the hundred dollar range, but would only work when the satellite is above the horizon. If used at only two percent of capacity it could still generate more than a million dollars a year. The service could also have subscribers who want to see past over flights, or views of other parts of the world. Advertising might also become a source of revenue. The entire assembly, including stabilizers, satcams and broadcast elements might weigh less than a hundred pounds and cost less than a million to build and launch. If successful, a constellation of satellites could offer 24/7 coverage of the earth's enchanting, changeing, beauty. It would certainly offer a more dramatic view of our home planet than keyhole or the other services presently provided. It would give the earthbound the chance to see the world as the astronaut sees it. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The Apollo Hoax FAQ (is not spam) :-) | Nathan Jones | UK Astronomy | 8 | August 1st 04 09:08 PM |
The Apollo Hoax FAQ (is not spam) :-) | Nathan Jones | Misc | 6 | July 29th 04 06:14 AM |
Apollo | Buzz alDredge | Astronomy Misc | 5 | July 28th 04 10:05 AM |
Apollo | Buzz alDredge | Misc | 5 | July 28th 04 10:05 AM |
Unofficial Space Shuttle Launch Guide | Steven S. Pietrobon | Space Shuttle | 0 | February 2nd 04 03:33 AM |