![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]() ring_theory wrote: Perhaps but i wouldn't count on it man is hopeless. dont accuse the rest of the human race of being like you |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "yt56erd" wrote in message ps.com... ring_theory wrote: snip - top tip circle lover try trimming the crap to make your messages readable I'm not beyond playing the part of a fool. If voicing my concern about an event that has even in an infinitismal chance that it could destroy the planet We ALL live on, than I'm the fool all day long. Thats a relief. you are a fool all day long. we already estabished that. My appreation for the masses and their entropy of it is what creates the concern. Some things split when you impact them. but you have no idea of the forces involved or the method of working out if/how an object will split under impact. No I'm not into the intricacies of the inflated funding game nasa plays. It's not like nasa hasn't got maneuvering in space down to a science. However they have got science down to a science. unlike you. I could make it alot easier and less time consuming. But NASA doesn't have the time for joe dumfuk inventors. Thank god. otherwise they would have to listen to the likes of you all day long demanding that they explain all their calculations and work because you assume they havent bothered to think it through. Won't if we don't try. But I am sure you would find enough faults with that plan if it was ever put forward. do you honestly think that nasa people have never considered any other option? There is plenty to worry about. just because you choose to dissmiss the the bad possibilities, doesn't mean they go away. true. people dismiss you but you dont go away. there is a reason i don't. how do you get out of bed each day? can you bring yourself to cross roads? Do you know the risk of you being hit by lightening is more measureable than the risks you are worried about here. have you ever worked out the risks and attendent probabilities of getting electrocuted plugging your pc in so you can go online and make posts like this? For a starter they are a LOT bigger than 1/(almost)infinity. I hope the damned thing splits into 3 pieces and mars pulls it in. Ring I hope it shatters into peieces just small enough that one single pebble makes it through the atmosphere and hits you. Death would be better than putting up with ignorance. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
ring_theory wrote:
"Dan Baldwin" wrote in message ... ring_theory wrote: No I'm the only one on the planet taking this seriously. Perhaps there is hope for humanity after all. Perhaps but i wouldn't count on it man is hopeless. You are Alexa Cameron, and I claim my two fifty. -- Dan Baldwin, unethical *by design* I am a minion of Satan, but my powers are mainly administrative. Hail the un-alive |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dan Baldwin" wrote in message ... ring_theory wrote: "Dan Baldwin" wrote in message ... ring_theory wrote: No I'm the only one on the planet taking this seriously. Perhaps there is hope for humanity after all. Perhaps but i wouldn't count on it man is hopeless. You are Alexa Cameron, and I claim my two fifty. Whatever |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Wally Anglesea=99 wrote: On 24 Apr 2005 13:35:21 -0700, "george" wrote: Widdershins wrote: Sun, 24 Apr 2005 08:09:08 GMT, "ring_theory" licked the point of a #2 Yellow Pencil, and wrote: I hope they win and nasa has to terminate the mission. we shouldn't be messing with things we know little or nothing about. 9p temple 1 slingshots between jupiter and mars this impact is going to do 2 things decrease it's mass and increase it's velocity. I suspect that nasa is trying to get the comet to impact with mars adding water to the planet which would be good for mars. problem is that by increasing the velocity of the comet it is more likely it won't complete it's slingshot it'll reach escape velocity to soon and be hurtled in an unexpected direction most likely right into earths path. if by chance it's not a immediate responce by impact or the unexpected direction thing it may still do it years down the line as soon as the fall of 2010. And your degree in orbital mechanics is from...? The Inquisition probably. I wasn't expecting the Inquisition No-one expects the Inquisition Remember. The Sun goes round the Earth ROTFLMAO the mass is reduced ??????? Are you sure that the poster isn't attempting to get their Iq into the low single figures ?? -- Maj. General, Fanatic Legions. Commander of Southern Hemisphere Forces. Find out about Australia's most dangerous Doomsday Cult: http://users.bigpond.net.au/wanglese/pebble.htm |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "ring_theory" wrote in message news:FD%ae.18209$NU4.5696@attbi_s22... Right I can agree with that however it's not it's natural orbit that bothers me as much as what it's orbit is going to be after we blow some landscape out of it and give it a boost in velocity altering it's orbit. Had this approach been used on titan we'd be dealing with a cataclismic galactical event! Some things don't react well with explosions. NASA could have just as well landed a probe of sorts on it and collect data over a period of time which is the normal method. Why all of a sudden do we change our method of observation?? Colliding particles isn't enough?? I just hope my speculations are wrong! Oh, they're wrong all right. In fact, everything you've written has been wrong on one level or another. |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 25 Apr 2005 18:46:24 GMT, "ring_theory"
wrote: "Jim Phillips" wrote in message news:Pine.SOL.3.96.1050425075543.23689F-100000@mail... On Mon, 25 Apr 2005, ring_theory wrote: "Wally AngleseaT " wrote in message ... On Sun, 24 Apr 2005 20:09:53 -0700, Bob Officer wrote: On Sun, 24 Apr 2005 06:17:01 -0700, in alt.astrology, Widdershins wrote: Sun, 24 Apr 2005 08:09:08 GMT, "ring_theory" licked the point of a #2 Yellow Pencil, and wrote: I hope they win and nasa has to terminate the mission. we shouldn't be messing with things we know little or nothing about. 9p temple 1 slingshots between jupiter and mars this impact is going to do 2 things decrease it's mass and increase it's velocity. I suspect that nasa is trying to get the comet to impact with mars adding water to the planet which would be good for mars. problem is that by increasing the velocity of the comet it is more likely it won't complete it's slingshot it'll reach escape velocity to soon and be hurtled in an unexpected direction most likely right into earths path. if by chance it's not a immediate responce by impact or the unexpected direction thing it may still do it years down the line as soon as the fall of 2010. And your degree in orbital mechanics is from...? Good question since a decrease of mass and increase in DeltaV will raise the orbit. Said orbit now varies between mars and jupiter will put said object farther from Earth which orbits inside Mars orbit. Tempel1 orbits in a 2:1 resonance with Jupiter. IN a few years, Jupiter will give it another nudge, as it has in the past. JUpiter nudged the comet so that it "went missing" for years, before being re-acquired, and working back the mechanics, it was established that the object was indeed Tempel1. On of the reasons NASA picked Temepl1 is that it's orbit is so precisely known. Something the chicken littles of the world seem to deliberately ignore. Right I can agree with that however it's not it's natural orbit that bothers me as much as what it's orbit is going to be after we blow some landscape out of it and give it a boost in velocity altering it's orbit. Had this approach been used on titan we'd be dealing with a cataclismic galactical event! Some things don't react well with explosions. You obviously have *zero* appreciation for the masses involved. I strongly suggest you learn *something* before making an even greater fool of yourself. I'm not beyond playing the part of a fool. Sig file material #1 If voicing my concern about an event that has even in an infinitismal chance that it could destroy the planet We ALL live on, than I'm the fool all day long. Sig file material #2 My appreation for the masses and their entropy of it is what creates the concern. Some things split when you impact them. NASA could have just as well landed a probe of sorts on it and collect data over a period of time which is the normal method. Again, you have *no* appreciation for how hard a mission like this would be. No I'm not into the intricacies of the inflated funding game nasa plays. It's not like nasa hasn't got maneuvering in space down to a science. I could make it alot easier and less time consuming. But NASA doesn't have the time for joe dumfuk inventors. Why all of a sudden do we change our method of observation?? How many missions have we landed on comets? Won't if we don't try. Colliding particles isn't enough?? I just hope my speculations are wrong! You have nothing to worry about--your speculations are wildly wrong. There is plenty to worry about. just because you choose to dissmiss the the bad possibilities, doesn't mean they go away. I hope the damned thing splits into 3 pieces and mars pulls it in. Do you know the kinetic energy required to divert the comet arrive at Mars? Come back when you have figured it out. -- Maj. General, Fanatic Legions. Commander of Southern Hemisphere Forces. Find out about Australia's most dangerous Doomsday Cult: http://users.bigpond.net.au/wanglese/pebble.htm |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 25 Apr 2005, ring_theory wrote:
"Jim Phillips" wrote in message news:Pine.SOL.3.96.1050425075543.23689F-100000@mail... On Mon, 25 Apr 2005, ring_theory wrote: "Wally AngleseaT " wrote in message ... On Sun, 24 Apr 2005 20:09:53 -0700, Bob Officer wrote: On Sun, 24 Apr 2005 06:17:01 -0700, in alt.astrology, Widdershins wrote: Sun, 24 Apr 2005 08:09:08 GMT, "ring_theory" licked the point of a #2 Yellow Pencil, and wrote: I hope they win and nasa has to terminate the mission. we shouldn't be messing with things we know little or nothing about. 9p temple 1 slingshots between jupiter and mars this impact is going to do 2 things decrease it's mass and increase it's velocity. I suspect that nasa is trying to get the comet to impact with mars adding water to the planet which would be good for mars. problem is that by increasing the velocity of the comet it is more likely it won't complete it's slingshot it'll reach escape velocity to soon and be hurtled in an unexpected direction most likely right into earths path. if by chance it's not a immediate responce by impact or the unexpected direction thing it may still do it years down the line as soon as the fall of 2010. And your degree in orbital mechanics is from...? Good question since a decrease of mass and increase in DeltaV will raise the orbit. Said orbit now varies between mars and jupiter will put said object farther from Earth which orbits inside Mars orbit. Tempel1 orbits in a 2:1 resonance with Jupiter. IN a few years, Jupiter will give it another nudge, as it has in the past. JUpiter nudged the comet so that it "went missing" for years, before being re-acquired, and working back the mechanics, it was established that the object was indeed Tempel1. On of the reasons NASA picked Temepl1 is that it's orbit is so precisely known. Something the chicken littles of the world seem to deliberately ignore. Right I can agree with that however it's not it's natural orbit that bothers me as much as what it's orbit is going to be after we blow some landscape out of it and give it a boost in velocity altering it's orbit. Had this approach been used on titan we'd be dealing with a cataclismic galactical event! Some things don't react well with explosions. You obviously have *zero* appreciation for the masses involved. I strongly suggest you learn *something* before making an even greater fool of yourself. I'm not beyond playing the part of a fool. If voicing my concern about an event that has even in an infinitismal chance that it could destroy the planet We ALL live on, than I'm the fool all day long. If I tried hard enough I could come up with a scenario wherein my opening up a can of soda precipitates the destruction of all life on Earth. How seriously should such a scenario be taken? My appreation for the masses and their entropy of it is what creates the concern. Some things split when you impact them. Again: you have *zero* appreciation for the masses involved; here's a quick-and-dirty calculation: Tempel 1 is about 6 km long, but it's not spherical, so let's say it's got the volume of a sphere about 3 km across. The volume of a sphere is 4/3 * pi * r**3 (simplified to 4 * r**3), so the volume of the comet is 4 x (1.5)**3 = 13.5 cubic kilometers. Assuming the comet is about as dense as water, it has a density of 1 gram per cubic centimeter. 13.5 cubic kms = 13.5 x 10**15 cubic cms = 1.35 x 10**16 grams (13,500,000,000,000,000 gms). The impactor mass is about 840 lbs which is about 400 kg = 4 x 10**8 gms. So the comet is over 30,000,000 times as massive as the impactor (an SUV is roughly 30,000,000 times as massive as a nickel). NASA could have just as well landed a probe of sorts on it and collect data over a period of time which is the normal method. Again, you have *no* appreciation for how hard a mission like this would be. No I'm not into the intricacies of the inflated funding game nasa plays. It's not like nasa hasn't got maneuvering in space down to a science. Landing on a moving body that doesn't have an atmosphere is much harder than you think. I could make it alot easier and less time consuming. But NASA doesn't have the time for joe dumfuk inventors. What would you do to make it "easier and less time consuming"? Why all of a sudden do we change our method of observation?? How many missions have we landed on comets? Won't if we don't try. So for you the first step is landing a mission? Colliding particles isn't enough?? I just hope my speculations are wrong! You have nothing to worry about--your speculations are wildly wrong. There is plenty to worry about. just because you choose to dissmiss the the bad possibilities, doesn't mean they go away. There is a non-zero chance that I'll be struck by a meteor right about...now. Nope, no meteor hit me; if one had, I'd probably be dead. So being struck by a meteor is definitely a bad possibility--do you worry that you'll be struck by a meteor? If not, why not? I hope the damned thing splits into 3 pieces and mars pulls it in. Wait, I thought you didn't want it impacting on Mars--what gives? -- Jim Phillips, jay pee aitch eye el el eye pee at bee see pee ell dot net "Moms and dads these days are like the Democratic party: lame, spineless and not holding up their end of the equation. And kids are like the Republicans: drunk with power and out of control." -- Bill Maher |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jim Phillips" wrote in message news:Pine.SOL.3.96.1050425192641.23689I-100000@mail... I hope the damned thing splits into 3 pieces and mars pulls it in. Wait, I thought you didn't want it impacting on Mars--what gives? I don't want it impacting earth. ring |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 26 Apr 2005, ring_theory wrote:
"Jim Phillips" wrote in message news:Pine.SOL.3.96.1050425192641.23689I-100000@mail... I hope the damned thing splits into 3 pieces and mars pulls it in. Wait, I thought you didn't want it impacting on Mars--what gives? I don't want it impacting earth. I notice you snipped the calculations I made showing that Tempel 1 is about 30,000,000 times more massive than the impactor. Do you still think the impactor will have much of an effect on Tempel 1? If so, why? -- Jim Phillips, jay pee aitch eye el el eye pee at bee see pee ell dot net "Moms and dads these days are like the Democratic party: lame, spineless and not holding up their end of the equation. And kids are like the Republicans: drunk with power and out of control." -- Bill Maher |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
NOMINATION: digest, volume 2453397 | Ross | Astronomy Misc | 233 | October 23rd 05 04:24 AM |
NASA partnership to benefit woman in science and technology | [email protected] | Policy | 0 | March 10th 05 03:10 PM |
Selected Restricted NASA Videotapes | Michael Ravnitzky | Policy | 5 | January 16th 04 04:28 PM |
NASA: Gases Breached Wing of Shuttle Atlantis in 2000 | Rusty Barton | Space Shuttle | 2 | July 10th 03 01:27 AM |