A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Space Science » History
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Crew Excursion Vehicle and Military Space Tug.



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old January 17th 04, 09:03 AM
Jonathan Silverlight
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In message , Pat Flannery
writes


Jorge R. Frank wrote:

Maybe half. "On the bounce" was a favorite phrase of Sergeant Jelal
from the book. I don't know what the hell a "homopolar generator" is,


I'm surprised that more people haven't heard about it around here...I
mean seriously, we all know how to evacuate ourselves from a Sperry
Ball Turret, so I just assumed....


But given a big flywheel/rotor at high RPM, you can dump a terrific
amount of momentary electrical power into whatever you want to drive
as the rotor is stopped...around the amount coming out of Hoover Dam
from something the size of a large basement freezer.


They use (or did use) one at the JET project to provide the pulse for
their fusion tests.
But it's "Rodger" Young - or did the film get that wrong too?
--
Rabbit arithmetic - 1 plus 1 equals 10
Remove spam and invalid from address to reply.
  #22  
Old January 17th 04, 02:39 PM
Pat Flannery
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Jonathan Silverlight wrote:


They use (or did use) one at the JET project to provide the pulse for
their fusion tests.
But it's "Rodger" Young - or did the film get that wrong too?


No, it's the Rodger Young in both the movie and the book- but the men
of "Roger's Hung" make those guys look like wimps; we kill bugs with our
teeth, like Harley-Davidson riders! Our motto is "When you need
something rogered, we are the men to call!" But the one in the movie
doesn't look even vaguely the way I pictured a dropship to look (I
pictured a big heat shield with the main body of the ship riding on top,
so that it could skip off the atmosphere as it dropped the trooper
landing pods- but with no power suits or landing pods in the movie, that
idea was obviously a non-starter. As should have been the movie
itself.); the movie one: http://www.starshipmodeler.com/Other/stroop.htm
looks like something a bug could destroy just by farting at it, which
may explain quite a bit. Pity something big and scary doesn't fart fiery
plasma at Paul Verhoeven one of these days...maybe as she ages,
Elizabeth Berkley will put on weight... ;-)

Pat



  #23  
Old January 17th 04, 06:17 PM
Henry Spencer
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
Pat Flannery wrote:
I think the "On the Bounce" part might.

Page 6 of the paperback, but that's my old faltering eyes talking.


Does this mean we get a shirt or something?


Nope. That wasn't the exact phrase used in the posting.
--
MOST launched 30 June; science observations running | Henry Spencer
since Oct; first surprises seen; papers pending. |
  #24  
Old January 17th 04, 06:23 PM
Henry Spencer
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
Pat Flannery wrote:
"homopolar generators"? Sounds like a gay sex toy.


...were working on it to drive lasers and rail guns.


The thing they carefully never mentioned in the press releases was that a
big rack full of truck batteries actually worked better, delivering the
same output with less mass and much lower cost. The homopolar-generator
guys kept promising that the *next* version was going to do better...

The experimental railgun at Eglin AFB ran off a big shed full of Sears
Die-Hards.
--
MOST launched 30 June; science observations running | Henry Spencer
since Oct; first surprises seen; papers pending. |
  #25  
Old January 17th 04, 06:38 PM
OM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On 17 Jan 2004 05:06:07 GMT, "Jorge R. Frank"
wrote:

I don't know what the hell a "homopolar generator" is,


....Actually, it's what the elves use to keep Santa warm when the Mrs.
is holding out on him.

OM

--

"No ******* ever won a war by dying for | http://www.io.com/~o_m
his country. He won it by making the other | Sergeant-At-Arms
poor dumb ******* die for his country." | Human O-Ring Society

- General George S. Patton, Jr
  #26  
Old January 17th 04, 10:12 PM
Charleston
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"OM" Owa tagu siam aka DosCojones aka blue man wrote:
"Jorge R. Frank" wrote:

I don't know what the hell a "homopolar generator" is,


Cool story actually
http://www.distinti.com/publications...inalriddle.htm

...Actually, it's what the elves use to keep Santa warm when the Mrs.
is holding out on him.


You da expurt JerOMe. Try addressing the issue.

You are obviously referring to a child's erector set; which is something for
which you are constantly compensating.


--

Daniel
http://www.challengerdisaster.info
Mount Charleston, not Charleston, SC


  #27  
Old January 17th 04, 11:25 PM
Andrew Gray
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article , Jorge R. Frank wrote:

I think the "On the Bounce" part might.


Page 6 of the paperback, but that's my old faltering eyes talking.


Twenty-odd appearances, courtesy of a reference electronic copy and a
search function g

--
-Andrew Gray

  #28  
Old January 18th 04, 08:58 AM
Pat Flannery
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Andrew Gray wrote:

Twenty-odd appearances, courtesy of a reference electronic copy and a
search function g


I'm thinkin' a whole ****in' _rack_ of t-shirts!

Pat

  #29  
Old January 19th 04, 01:30 AM
Scott Hedrick
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Jorge R. Frank" wrote in message
...
even
having seen Verhoeven's wretched movie


Better known as the CGI Artist Workfare Experiment.

It could have stood on its own, and completely avoided soiling Heinlein's
work.


  #30  
Old January 19th 04, 05:20 AM
Jorge R. Frank
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Scott Hedrick" wrote in
news
"Jorge R. Frank" wrote in message
...
even
having seen Verhoeven's wretched movie


Better known as the CGI Artist Workfare Experiment.

It could have stood on its own, and completely avoided soiling Heinlein's
work.


Yeah, once they decided not to attempt to animate the powered suits, they
could have just changed all the names and avoided the royalty payments to
the Heinlein estate.


--
JRF

Reply-to address spam-proofed - to reply by E-mail,
check "Organization" (I am not assimilated) and
think one step ahead of IBM.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Unofficial Space Shuttle Launch Guide Steven S. Pietrobon Space Shuttle 0 August 5th 04 01:36 AM
National Space Policy: NSDD-42 (issued on July 4th, 1982) Stuf4 Space Shuttle 150 July 28th 04 07:30 AM
National Space Policy: NSDD-42 (issued on July 4th, 1982) Stuf4 Policy 145 July 28th 04 07:30 AM
Unofficial Space Shuttle Launch Guide Steven S. Pietrobon Space Shuttle 0 April 2nd 04 12:01 AM
Unofficial Space Shuttle Launch Guide Steven S. Pietrobon Space Shuttle 0 February 2nd 04 03:33 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:59 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.