![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Pardon me for interrupting/hijacking this thread, but maybe someone
can answer my question below: On Sat, 20 Nov 2004 18:55:26 GMT, William Hamblen wrote: In the 1960s Tinsley made a 20" APO for some Texas oil millionaire that came in at a quarter million. The telescope wound up at Lowell but it has since been dismantled. I recall a refractor primary on display in the Smithsonian circa 1971, which was, if I recall the short story on the plaque associated with it correctly, the largest refractor lens ever made, and for some reason I forget (perhaps those involved ran out of money), no telescope was ever built using it. It had a mirror behind it so you could see yourself magnified through it. I recall it being "several feet" in diameter (what's the largest refractor?). I was about 13 years old at the visit, and so may not remember correctly, but can anyone tell me more about what I might have seen? ----- http://mindspring.com/~benbradley |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 20 Nov 2004 23:26:26 GMT, Ben Bradley
wrote: Pardon me for interrupting/hijacking this thread, but maybe someone can answer my question below: On Sat, 20 Nov 2004 18:55:26 GMT, William Hamblen wrote: In the 1960s Tinsley made a 20" APO for some Texas oil millionaire that came in at a quarter million. The telescope wound up at Lowell but it has since been dismantled. I recall a refractor primary on display in the Smithsonian circa 1971, which was, if I recall the short story on the plaque associated with it correctly, the largest refractor lens ever made, and for some reason I forget (perhaps those involved ran out of money), no telescope was ever built using it. It had a mirror behind it so you could see yourself magnified through it. I recall it being "several feet" in diameter (what's the largest refractor?). I was about 13 years old at the visit, and so may not remember correctly, but can anyone tell me more about what I might have seen? They built a 1.1 meter objective in France about 1900 that never worked well enough to be useful. This was the largest refractor I ever knew about. I don't know where the lens is now. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "William Hamblen" wrote in message They built a 1.1 meter objective in France about 1900 that never worked well enough to be useful. This was the largest refractor I ever knew about. I don't know where the lens is now. Go to http://astro.uchicago.edu/vtour/inside/telescopes.html and Yerkes observatory claims to have the largest refractor in the world, a 40 incher. They still use it. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Okay Folks,
I think you shall see at least some infos about the object of discussion, therefore here some links https://www.astromart.com/images/cla...9/284859-1.jpg https://www.astromart.com/images/cla...9/284859-4.jpg https://www.astromart.com/images/cla...9/284859-2.jpg https://www.astromart.com/images/cla...9/284859-5.jpg https://www.astromart.com/images/cla...9/284859-3.jpg now tell me, is that not worth $ 10,000 for a collector ? :-) have fun Markus -- Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 16:44:56 +0000 (UTC), "Markus Ludes"
wrote: Okay Folks, I think you shall see at least some infos about the object of discussion, therefore here some links https://www.astromart.com/images/cla...9/284859-1.jpg https://www.astromart.com/images/cla...9/284859-4.jpg https://www.astromart.com/images/cla...9/284859-2.jpg https://www.astromart.com/images/cla...9/284859-5.jpg https://www.astromart.com/images/cla...9/284859-3.jpg now tell me, is that not worth $ 10,000 for a collector ? :-) have fun Markus When was this produced? It's got what looks like a feather touch focuser so it's not even an original Zeiss tube and focuser. Seems to me that if originality counts for much in terms of collectors items (and in every other hobby it does) then wouldn't a pristine 100mm APQ with original tube, lens and focuser be worth at least as much? -Rich |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Markus When was this produced? to be honest, I dont know. But from engraving and cell design, it must be in the last days of zeiss, since if Zeiss would have continued, it would have gone into production. It's got what looks like a feather touch focuser so it's not even an original Zeiss tube and focuser. no of course not. I have had the chance to buy on ebay with the lens all parts to have build a original tube, but it would come out even more expensive and I self don't like to much the Zeiss styled mechanics, so we made our own tube Seems to me that if originality counts for much in terms of collectors items (and in every other hobby it does) then wouldn't a pristine 100mm APQ with original tube, lens and focuser be worth at least as much? yes and no. I have had already offers for the 80 mm with my tube, higher then like new APQ 100/640 with original tubes. What setting the price very high here, is the unique APQ 80 and its serial Nr. 1. The Nr 2 ( only 2 have been made) have never shown up in the market yet, so this is the only 1 known in the market, where you can find some 100/640 somewhere Markus -Rich -- Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 19:15:16 +0000 (UTC), "Markus Ludes"
wrote: Markus When was this produced? to be honest, I dont know. But from engraving and cell design, it must be in the last days of zeiss, since if Zeiss would have continued, it would have gone into production. It's got what looks like a feather touch focuser so it's not even an original Zeiss tube and focuser. no of course not. I have had the chance to buy on ebay with the lens all parts to have build a original tube, but it would come out even more expensive and I self don't like to much the Zeiss styled mechanics, so we made our own tube Seems to me that if originality counts for much in terms of collectors items (and in every other hobby it does) then wouldn't a pristine 100mm APQ with original tube, lens and focuser be worth at least as much? yes and no. I have had already offers for the 80 mm with my tube, higher then like new APQ 100/640 with original tubes. What setting the price very high here, is the unique APQ 80 and its serial Nr. 1. The Nr 2 ( only 2 have been made) have never shown up in the market yet, so this is the only 1 known in the market, where you can find some 100/640 somewhere Markus -Rich That is rare. Something turned up at Stellafane one year (1990?). It was a Zeiss 70mm achromat, around f7. The guy sold it to a friend for about $100. I looked though it, definition was of course excellent. I don't remember Zeiss ever having offered a 70mm scope in any ads. The only small scopes I remember were the 63mm teaching refactors. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Meade price increase | Mark | UK Astronomy | 9 | June 23rd 04 11:07 AM |
Highest magnifications | gswork | Amateur Astronomy | 12 | May 17th 04 04:45 PM |
Reasonable price 4 Rukl Moon Atlas? | Francis Marion | Amateur Astronomy | 26 | March 26th 04 06:43 AM |
price recommendations on a pier | j[nospam][email protected] | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | January 23rd 04 01:20 AM |
Six times the fun for twice the price. . . | Tom Merkle | Policy | 45 | December 14th 03 02:02 AM |