![]() |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Moon River wrote: Do you have a polar alignment scope? In any event, to align on Polaris, one must be either using the scope itself or a polar alignment scope. All that is necessary is to get close so if one has a sense of where north is, then that is probably good enough to being alignment. jon I can't believe all the people who are always saying getting in the vacinity of polaris is "good enough" for polar aligning. That is so lame. Many of us are pragmatists. I'd rather spend another 20 min viewing than striving for perfection. And my experience is the "Close enough" is "good enough" -- particularly when Polaris is not precisely "North" anyway. But it is a hobby: We all do what we enjoy. Phil |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
When you use a map to find a place on the earth you use LAT and LONG. The
same has to be true for the sky. Do you polar align your map too, or just turn it until it's facing north. To most people simply turning the map so that the top is facing north is "good enough". |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
All that is necessary is to get close so if one
has a sense of where north is, then that is probably good enough to being alignment. jon I can't believe all the people who are always saying getting in the vacinity of polaris is "good enough" for polar aligning. Actually your rant is the result of misunderstanding my typo... "probably good enough to being alignment." makes no sense. What I meant to write was "probably good enough to BEGIN alignment." In otherwords, one does not have to see Polaris visually in order to BEGIN the polar alignment process. One just has to get close enough to see it in the alignment scope or in the scope itself. I find that by setting the polar axis to the proper value and just making sure the base is reasonably level that I can find Polaris without seeing it even from a site I have never seen before. jon |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Chris L Peterson" wrote in message ... On Sun, 5 Sep 2004 19:05:25 -0500, "The Ancient One" wrote: In other words, you phrased your question poorly. What you were asking was how SOON after sunset is it visible, not how long. It is visible all night long, once it first becomes visible. Well, if you are going to be pedantic to the point of being obnoxious (and not even attempt to answer the rather obvious, if poorly phrased question) I did answer his question as it was asked. Polaris is always in the same position, therefore it is visible all night long. Clouds or lighting may obscure it, which is why I refrained from the blanket statement that it IS visible all night long. I answered the question as it was asked, and did so politely, in an attempt to help. All I've received for my efforts has been insults and grief. I was told this was a good group for amatuers, I was told wrong. |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 6 Sep 2004 13:11:58 -0500, "The Ancient One"
wrote: I did answer his question as it was asked... Then I apologize for calling you obnoxious. I should have said dense. g _________________________________________________ Chris L Peterson Cloudbait Observatory http://www.cloudbait.com |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "vic20owner" wrote in message ... When you use a map to find a place on the earth you use LAT and LONG. The same has to be true for the sky. Do you polar align your map too, or just turn it until it's facing north. To most people simply turning the map so that the top is facing north is "good enough". Do you mean turn or orientate? Do you use lat and long on a map when you really don't know where a place is on the earth..if you don't then either you have a very good index or your comment ranks right up there with the 3 dumbest posts next to "the ancient one". |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sketcher wrote:
Some *have* seen Polaris in the daytime (with the aid of a telescope). I know of one person who has even polar-aligned a mount in the daytime by observing Polaris. It helps to have a clean, transparent sky; patience; a wide-field eyepiece (pre-focused at infinity) and a fairly accurate idea of where to look. Here's another gimmick for finding Polaris during the day: Use a "Polaris-ing" filter -- more commonly known as a polarizer. Polaris is 90 degrees (+/- 23 degrees) angularly distant from the Sun. So it always lies in a patch of sky where Rayleigh-scattered blue light exhibits maximum polarization. A single, well-oriented polarizing filter thus squelches the background sky significantly more than it squelches Polaris. -- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Mark Gingrich San Leandro, California |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Chris L Peterson" wrote in message ... On Mon, 6 Sep 2004 13:11:58 -0500, "The Ancient One" wrote: I did answer his question as it was asked... Then I apologize for calling you obnoxious. I should have said dense. g That's better ;-) _________________________________________________ Chris L Peterson Cloudbait Observatory http://www.cloudbait.com |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
![]() " Here's another gimmick for finding Polaris during the day: Use a "Polaris-ing" filter -- more commonly known as a polarizer. Polaris is 90 degrees (+/- 23 degrees) angularly distant from the Sun. So it always lies in a patch of sky where Rayleigh-scattered blue light exhibits maximum polarization. A single, well-oriented polarizing filter thus squelches the background sky significantly more than it squelches Polaris. I will look into this. Sounds interesting |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Do you mean turn or orientate? Do you use lat and long on a map when you really don't know where a place is on the earth..if you don't then either you have a very good index or your comment ranks right up there with the 3 dumbest posts next to "the ancient one". Honestly, I'd have to say "How long after sunset can you pick out Polaris with the unaided eye?" beats it hands down. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Polaris Mount - 12V RA motor source? | Gary Weber | Amateur Astronomy | 3 | June 21st 04 08:51 PM |
Polaris: Precession & Proper Motion | Sandy Tipper | Astronomy Misc | 0 | April 17th 04 02:46 PM |
Polaris, Proper Motion, and Precession | Sandy Tipper | Misc | 0 | April 12th 04 05:37 PM |
Cosmological Polaris effect | Oriel36 | Astronomy Misc | 3 | January 23rd 04 05:02 PM |