![]() |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm reading "Telescope Optics" by Rutten & van Venrooij and have
some questions. First the observation that the authors appear wildly inconsistent about what they think their target audience knows. I get the impression the book most often assumes a knowledge of optics in general and its goal is to flesh out telescope optics in particular with perhaps a brief review. In 4.2.2 they discuss coma and attribute it to "the intersection of rays not being symmetrical." Shouldn't "off axis light" come into the telescope in a symmetrical fashion when confronting an evenly distributed light source? If one were to rotate the lens or mirror, would the coma rotate as well? WRT diffraction spikes, if the secondary mirror and struts are not in the plane of focus, why would the diffraction effect occur where the mirror itself is not visible? And if it's an "edge effect," way doesn't the edge of the telescope tube diffract the light as well in a way that is visible? Also, (and this may sound silly to those more knowledgeable than I) isn't there a compound glass that has the property of being neutral to light in one direction and reflect it 90 degrees from the other? It would be like a two-way mirror with the mirror embedded into the prism at an angle. It's such a simple solution to having an obstruction that this type of prism must present insurmountable problems. -- Craig Franck Cortland, NY |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
More about light gathering - big aperture & mediocre optics? | gswork | Amateur Astronomy | 26 | February 22nd 04 07:51 AM |
Question about alignment & pointing north, level | Mike | Amateur Astronomy | 8 | September 7th 03 12:04 AM |
Rookie question. How dark is MY sky? | justbeats | Amateur Astronomy | 4 | August 3rd 03 12:08 PM |
StarMax 127 question | Skip Freeman | Amateur Astronomy | 5 | July 16th 03 04:04 PM |