Global warming or NOT global warming?

Quadibloc wrote in
:

On Thursday, January 31, 2019 at 10:40:34 AM UTC-7, Ninapenda
Jibini wrote:
wrote in
:
On Thursday, January 31, 2019 at 9:24:43 AM UTC-5, Chris L
Peterson wrote:

but there's no doubt that such
events are more frequent and more severe because of it.

There is not enough evidence to support that last "thought."

His lack of doubt has nothing to do with facts,

The scientists were right about evolution. The scientists were
right about relativity. Science is not to be gainsaid, it is to
be heeded and obeyed.

The question is whether or not there's any science involved. Since
there's a Chris involved, one can safely assume there's not, because
he's too stupid to even know what science is.

You, of course, aren't much smarter.

--
Terry Austin

Vacation photos from Iceland:
https://plus.google.com/u/0/collection/QaXQkB

"Terry Austin: like the polio vaccine, only with more asshole."
-- David Bilek

Jesus forgives sinners, not criminals.

On Fri, 1 Feb 2019 06:24:51 -0800 (PST), Quadibloc
wrote:

On Thursday, January 31, 2019 at 10:40:34 AM UTC-7, Ninapenda Jibini wrote:
wrote in
:
On Thursday, January 31, 2019 at 9:24:43 AM UTC-5, Chris L
Peterson wrote:

but there's no doubt that such
events are more frequent and more severe because of it.

There is not enough evidence to support that last "thought."

His lack of doubt has nothing to do with facts,

The scientists were right about evolution. The scientists were right about
relativity. Science is not to be gainsaid, it is to be heeded and obeyed.

Snell v2. Rich. Harnagel. They're science deniers. Too stupid, too
uninformed, too dogmatic, too mentally ill to ever be swayed by
objective truth. Not worth the effort.

On Friday, February 1, 2019 at 10:42:15 PM UTC-7, Chris L Peterson slandered:

On Fri, 1 Feb 2019 06:24:51 -0800 (PST), Quadibloc
wrote:

The scientists were right about evolution. The scientists were right
about relativity. Science is not to be gainsaid, it is to be heeded
and obeyed.

Snell v2. Rich. Harnagel. They're science deniers. Too stupid, too
uninformed, too dogmatic, too mentally ill to ever be swayed by
objective truth. Not worth the effort.

Which proves that Peterson is not objective.

“There’s only one person you’re guaranteed to spend the rest of your
Life with … yourself. Don’t live the rest of your life with an asshole.�
– QuoteGate

On Saturday, February 2, 2019 at 12:42:15 AM UTC-5, Chris L Peterson wrote:
On Fri, 1 Feb 2019 06:24:51 -0800 (PST), Quadibloc
wrote:

On Thursday, January 31, 2019 at 10:40:34 AM UTC-7, Ninapenda Jibini wrote:
wrote in
:
On Thursday, January 31, 2019 at 9:24:43 AM UTC-5, Chris L
Peterson wrote:

but there's no doubt that such
events are more frequent and more severe because of it.

There is not enough evidence to support that last "thought."

His lack of doubt has nothing to do with facts,

The scientists were right about evolution. The scientists were right about
relativity. Science is not to be gainsaid, it is to be heeded and obeyed.

Snell v2. Rich. Harnagel. They're science deniers. Too stupid, too
uninformed, too dogmatic, too mentally ill to ever be swayed by
objective truth. Not worth the effort.

I won't speak for Rich or Gary, the way you presume to speak for us, but I am certainly not a science "denier" and I doubt that Rich or Gary are either.

What I am, is someone who is skeptical about the seriousness of a situation that alarmists are using for financial and political gain. Almost all of them are heavy polluters compared even to most of the people in their own industrialized countries.

You, peterson, are one such hypocritical alarmist.

On Fri, 1 Feb 2019 06:24:51 -0800 (PST), Quadibloc
wrote:
Science is not to be gainsaid, it is to be heeded and obeyed.

Do we have any option except to obey it? I mean, how do we disobey
e.g. the law of gravity?

On Sat, 02 Feb 2019 18:25:17 +0100, Paul Schlyter wrote:

On Fri, 1 Feb 2019 06:24:51 -0800 (PST), Quadibloc
wrote:
Science is not to be gainsaid, it is to be heeded and obeyed.

Do we have any option except to obey it? I mean, how do we disobey
e.g. the law of gravity?

NO ONE disobeys Nature -- EVER.

--
Email address is a Spam trap.

On Saturday, February 2, 2019 at 11:22:18 AM UTC-7, Bill wrote:

On Sat, 02 Feb 2019 18:25:17 +0100, Paul Schlyter wrote:

On Fri, 1 Feb 2019 06:24:51 -0800 (PST), Quadibloc
wrote:

Science is not to be gainsaid, it is to be heeded and obeyed.

Do we have any option except to obey it? I mean, how do we disobey
e.g. the law of gravity?

NO ONE disobeys Nature -- EVER.

True, but we don't really KNOW Nature. We have MODELS of Nature which
approximate Nature. We have "disobeyed" our models in the past (i.e.,
replaced them with new ones or newer versions), and we will do so again.