![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Ioannis" wrote in message ... ? "By-Tor" ?????? ??? ?????? ... It used to be that it took some skill to use a scope, you learned the night sky, you star hopped you figured out where your...was and you didn't need both hands and a government agency to tell you where it was. I agree with this part. Too many new amateurs are just "appliance operators." One could probably devise a short observing test, using an amateurish scope to distinguish "appliance operators" from serious amateurs. My favourite would be searching, finding and _seeing_ Uranus, using any non-toy telescope. Telescope. NOT binoculars! After 20+ years of observing, I still haven't seen it. snip *This* is a bigger problem in amateur astronomy, in my opinion, than lots of people buying telescopes (which is FANTASTIC and not a problem at all). One might get the impression that you were never a 'non-serious' amateur. You never needed some coaching when you started out? You didn't buy the best scope you could afford at the time? You didn't use as many means as possible to communicate with other amateurs and ask them what was good to find or look at? People ought to take their head from their butts and start distributing the ideas and knowledge they have (in some cases) worked hard to gain. Some do, but lots scoff at people who don't know the minimum number of hops to some obscure variable star... Indeed, your looking at the sky, not building a time machine or explaining quantum mechanics... Lucky there are decent people, like the QCUIAG group for example, who pass on their understanding, their ideas, their experiences and skills, etc to others without gripe or most of us would still be using film to photograph the sky before scanning it and posting on the internet. Why use a calculator when you have pen and paper? Why use the internet when you can chat all you like through your local astronomy club? Get a grip folks... These new fangled GOTO scopes are probably what you would buy if you were saving for your first (or 2nd) scope these days. Remember that no matter how much you know, there is always someone who knows something that you don't (and often knows more than you!) Sour grapes, jealousy and pomposity don't particularly advance the community much. On another note: 20+ years and you still can't find Uranus? *s******* Hmmm... Does that make you an appliance operator? Maybe just in need of assistance? Try posting on this newsgroup, they are very helpful ![]() Cheers -- K. removing tongue from cheek |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Ioannis" wrote in message ... ? "By-Tor" ?????? ??? ?????? ... It used to be that it took some skill to use a scope, you learned the night sky, you star hopped you figured out where your...was and you didn't need both hands and a government agency to tell you where it was. I agree with this part. Too many new amateurs are just "appliance operators." One could probably devise a short observing test, using an amateurish scope to distinguish "appliance operators" from serious amateurs. My favourite would be searching, finding and _seeing_ Uranus, using any non-toy telescope. Telescope. NOT binoculars! After 20+ years of observing, I still haven't seen it. snip *This* is a bigger problem in amateur astronomy, in my opinion, than lots of people buying telescopes (which is FANTASTIC and not a problem at all). One might get the impression that you were never a 'non-serious' amateur. You never needed some coaching when you started out? You didn't buy the best scope you could afford at the time? You didn't use as many means as possible to communicate with other amateurs and ask them what was good to find or look at? People ought to take their head from their butts and start distributing the ideas and knowledge they have (in some cases) worked hard to gain. Some do, but lots scoff at people who don't know the minimum number of hops to some obscure variable star... Indeed, your looking at the sky, not building a time machine or explaining quantum mechanics... Lucky there are decent people, like the QCUIAG group for example, who pass on their understanding, their ideas, their experiences and skills, etc to others without gripe or most of us would still be using film to photograph the sky before scanning it and posting on the internet. Why use a calculator when you have pen and paper? Why use the internet when you can chat all you like through your local astronomy club? Get a grip folks... These new fangled GOTO scopes are probably what you would buy if you were saving for your first (or 2nd) scope these days. Remember that no matter how much you know, there is always someone who knows something that you don't (and often knows more than you!) Sour grapes, jealousy and pomposity don't particularly advance the community much. On another note: 20+ years and you still can't find Uranus? *s******* Hmmm... Does that make you an appliance operator? Maybe just in need of assistance? Try posting on this newsgroup, they are very helpful ![]() Cheers -- K. removing tongue from cheek |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Ioannis" wrote in message ... ? "By-Tor" ?????? ??? ?????? ... It used to be that it took some skill to use a scope, you learned the night sky, you star hopped you figured out where your...was and you didn't need both hands and a government agency to tell you where it was. I agree with this part. Too many new amateurs are just "appliance operators." One could probably devise a short observing test, using an amateurish scope to distinguish "appliance operators" from serious amateurs. My favourite would be searching, finding and _seeing_ Uranus, using any non-toy telescope. Telescope. NOT binoculars! After 20+ years of observing, I still haven't seen it. snip *This* is a bigger problem in amateur astronomy, in my opinion, than lots of people buying telescopes (which is FANTASTIC and not a problem at all). One might get the impression that you were never a 'non-serious' amateur. You never needed some coaching when you started out? You didn't buy the best scope you could afford at the time? You didn't use as many means as possible to communicate with other amateurs and ask them what was good to find or look at? People ought to take their head from their butts and start distributing the ideas and knowledge they have (in some cases) worked hard to gain. Some do, but lots scoff at people who don't know the minimum number of hops to some obscure variable star... Indeed, your looking at the sky, not building a time machine or explaining quantum mechanics... Lucky there are decent people, like the QCUIAG group for example, who pass on their understanding, their ideas, their experiences and skills, etc to others without gripe or most of us would still be using film to photograph the sky before scanning it and posting on the internet. Why use a calculator when you have pen and paper? Why use the internet when you can chat all you like through your local astronomy club? Get a grip folks... These new fangled GOTO scopes are probably what you would buy if you were saving for your first (or 2nd) scope these days. Remember that no matter how much you know, there is always someone who knows something that you don't (and often knows more than you!) Sour grapes, jealousy and pomposity don't particularly advance the community much. On another note: 20+ years and you still can't find Uranus? *s******* Hmmm... Does that make you an appliance operator? Maybe just in need of assistance? Try posting on this newsgroup, they are very helpful ![]() Cheers -- K. removing tongue from cheek |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Ioannis" wrote in message ... ? "By-Tor" ?????? ??? ?????? ... It used to be that it took some skill to use a scope, you learned the night sky, you star hopped you figured out where your...was and you didn't need both hands and a government agency to tell you where it was. I agree with this part. Too many new amateurs are just "appliance operators." One could probably devise a short observing test, using an amateurish scope to distinguish "appliance operators" from serious amateurs. My favourite would be searching, finding and _seeing_ Uranus, using any non-toy telescope. Telescope. NOT binoculars! After 20+ years of observing, I still haven't seen it. snip *This* is a bigger problem in amateur astronomy, in my opinion, than lots of people buying telescopes (which is FANTASTIC and not a problem at all). One might get the impression that you were never a 'non-serious' amateur. You never needed some coaching when you started out? You didn't buy the best scope you could afford at the time? You didn't use as many means as possible to communicate with other amateurs and ask them what was good to find or look at? People ought to take their head from their butts and start distributing the ideas and knowledge they have (in some cases) worked hard to gain. Some do, but lots scoff at people who don't know the minimum number of hops to some obscure variable star... Indeed, your looking at the sky, not building a time machine or explaining quantum mechanics... Lucky there are decent people, like the QCUIAG group for example, who pass on their understanding, their ideas, their experiences and skills, etc to others without gripe or most of us would still be using film to photograph the sky before scanning it and posting on the internet. Why use a calculator when you have pen and paper? Why use the internet when you can chat all you like through your local astronomy club? Get a grip folks... These new fangled GOTO scopes are probably what you would buy if you were saving for your first (or 2nd) scope these days. Remember that no matter how much you know, there is always someone who knows something that you don't (and often knows more than you!) Sour grapes, jealousy and pomposity don't particularly advance the community much. On another note: 20+ years and you still can't find Uranus? *s******* Hmmm... Does that make you an appliance operator? Maybe just in need of assistance? Try posting on this newsgroup, they are very helpful ![]() Cheers -- K. removing tongue from cheek |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 14 Jan 2004 04:54:05 GMT, "Oscar"
wrote: Maybe you should start your own s.a.a. - moderated. That way you can screen out all these posts about telescopes from overpaid muppy creeps...like me. I forgot what all yuppy stands for but the *m* is for Mexican. See now you even have beaners in this newsgroup, what the hell is the universe coming to. I have all this disposable income with which I'm going to buy an 8 inch SCT with all the goodies, even GPS. Eat your heart out. Oscar You have me wrong there. I grew up along the border and between you and me I think Mexican, Latinos ect are great . It's not that you're Mexican, that's great, it's that you are wasting your money on a 8" sct. Foolishness crosses all cultural, racial, economic boundries... |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 14 Jan 2004 04:54:05 GMT, "Oscar"
wrote: Maybe you should start your own s.a.a. - moderated. That way you can screen out all these posts about telescopes from overpaid muppy creeps...like me. I forgot what all yuppy stands for but the *m* is for Mexican. See now you even have beaners in this newsgroup, what the hell is the universe coming to. I have all this disposable income with which I'm going to buy an 8 inch SCT with all the goodies, even GPS. Eat your heart out. Oscar You have me wrong there. I grew up along the border and between you and me I think Mexican, Latinos ect are great . It's not that you're Mexican, that's great, it's that you are wasting your money on a 8" sct. Foolishness crosses all cultural, racial, economic boundries... |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 14 Jan 2004 04:54:05 GMT, "Oscar"
wrote: Maybe you should start your own s.a.a. - moderated. That way you can screen out all these posts about telescopes from overpaid muppy creeps...like me. I forgot what all yuppy stands for but the *m* is for Mexican. See now you even have beaners in this newsgroup, what the hell is the universe coming to. I have all this disposable income with which I'm going to buy an 8 inch SCT with all the goodies, even GPS. Eat your heart out. Oscar You have me wrong there. I grew up along the border and between you and me I think Mexican, Latinos ect are great . It's not that you're Mexican, that's great, it's that you are wasting your money on a 8" sct. Foolishness crosses all cultural, racial, economic boundries... |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 14 Jan 2004 04:54:05 GMT, "Oscar"
wrote: Maybe you should start your own s.a.a. - moderated. That way you can screen out all these posts about telescopes from overpaid muppy creeps...like me. I forgot what all yuppy stands for but the *m* is for Mexican. See now you even have beaners in this newsgroup, what the hell is the universe coming to. I have all this disposable income with which I'm going to buy an 8 inch SCT with all the goodies, even GPS. Eat your heart out. Oscar You have me wrong there. I grew up along the border and between you and me I think Mexican, Latinos ect are great . It's not that you're Mexican, that's great, it's that you are wasting your money on a 8" sct. Foolishness crosses all cultural, racial, economic boundries... |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks, I go run over my new Orion 4.5 dob with my car, then I whip my self
with a cat and 9 tails and beg your forgiveness for looking at YOUR night sky. "The Macspert" wrote in message ... You know who cares, who really gives a damn that some over paid yuppy creep just received his new 3" APO on an alt aaz mount of a 14" SCT and then asks whats good to look at with the scope. I mean who gives rats ass. That's one of the problems with the whole amateur astronomy world, there are too damn many AMATEURS. It used to be that it took some skill to use a scope, you learned the night sky, you star hopped you figured out where your ass was and you didn't need both hands and a government agency to tell you where it was. Now we have any silly **** with a few bucks to burn out there buying these new GOTo scopes , scopes mind you that are at best a work in progress or like the MEADE LXD absolute complete ****. So the get the damn scope, think that have the thing put together, give the god damn thing some idiot name and drag the 90lb pile of junk outside and try and figure out which end is up. Well ****. |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks, I go run over my new Orion 4.5 dob with my car, then I whip my self
with a cat and 9 tails and beg your forgiveness for looking at YOUR night sky. "The Macspert" wrote in message ... You know who cares, who really gives a damn that some over paid yuppy creep just received his new 3" APO on an alt aaz mount of a 14" SCT and then asks whats good to look at with the scope. I mean who gives rats ass. That's one of the problems with the whole amateur astronomy world, there are too damn many AMATEURS. It used to be that it took some skill to use a scope, you learned the night sky, you star hopped you figured out where your ass was and you didn't need both hands and a government agency to tell you where it was. Now we have any silly **** with a few bucks to burn out there buying these new GOTo scopes , scopes mind you that are at best a work in progress or like the MEADE LXD absolute complete ****. So the get the damn scope, think that have the thing put together, give the god damn thing some idiot name and drag the 90lb pile of junk outside and try and figure out which end is up. Well ****. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
digest 2453183 | Frederick Shorts | Astronomy Misc | 3 | July 1st 04 08:29 PM |
First experience with a cheap scope -- puke!! | JAS | Amateur Astronomy | 14 | December 24th 03 03:35 PM |
How Young can a Kid Own a Scope? | Tony Flanders | Amateur Astronomy | 22 | December 9th 03 03:21 PM |
SMALL SCOPE + NICE BACKYARD = ENJOYABLE NIGHT! | David Knisely | Amateur Astronomy | 2 | October 27th 03 09:55 AM |
Spotting Scope or Binoculars? | John Honan | Amateur Astronomy | 22 | September 19th 03 05:17 PM |