Neil Armstrong’s Shadow Found in Thin Section?

On Apr 21, 11:28*am, "Chris.B" wrote:
On Apr 21, 7:09*pm, Brenda twittered:

In other words, you've never seriously criticized our government or
any of its agencies, because you really don't give a damn as long as
it doesn't negatively impact your redneck quality of life.

Brenda, you have the attention span of a gnat! How, on earth, can I be
a redneck? I don't qualify on any of the normal criteria. Except,
maybe, for the beer, the rusting pickup on the front lawn, my jeoh__
gee_oh___ grafi_cule situay__shunn and the good ol' girl on the porch.
Wearin' nuthin' but them denim shorts, a toothless smile and a loaded
assault rifle. Just in case them ale_e_uns comes a'callin'.. spit

More seriously: My wordy critiques of right wing American politics
have put me on more kill-files than Retch the butcher's delivery boy.
There's a CIA drone overhead most days and and an all black car,
without license plates, innocently parked across the street on most
weekdays. We count it a quiet day when there aren't several unmarked
helicopters circling at the same time. We never get a wink of sleep
for those black ops triangles humming away in the woods. And you think
you're paranoid? ;ø))

Good one. I withdraw my request for you to provide any links or much
less an index to such rants against the American mainstream status
quo. Except now I feel deprived, because most of the time I have no
black ops of any spy-drones nearby, much less having seen any of those
unmarked black cars with pesky MIB inside.

Do you have to maintain multiple IDs?

How far up on the NO FLY list are you?

How often do you wear those explosive underpants?

Are any of your shoes packing a load of Acetone Peroxide?

http://groups.google.com/groups/search
http://translate.google.com/#
Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet”

On Apr 22, 1:47*am, Brad Guth wrote:

Do you have to maintain multiple IDs?

You obviously haven't tugged my false beard.(she said in a
deliberately deep voice) cough

How far up on the NO FLY list are you?

The MIB's even stopped me from flying my video kite! (over the
Pentagon)

Did you know there are 4k (known) American security services?

How can the US possibly afford it? Answer: They obviously can't. The
country is drowning in debt. Why does the right wing complain about
big government and excessive taxes? Yet cheerfully subscribe to the
raving lunacy of 4000 different security services? If they each keep
secrets from each other (as they inevitably must, to maintain their
perceived value to the PTB) aren't they all endlessly duplicating each
other's activities? Who's coordinating these 4000 parallel information
channels into anything remotely useful for national security? Who is
watching the watchers who are watching the watcher's watcher's
watchers? And, if they are all working for the Government... who, the
hell, is doing any real work? The Chinese? It's completely nuts!!

On Apr 21, 10:51*pm, "Chris.B" wrote:
On Apr 22, 1:47*am, Brad Guth wrote:



Do you have to maintain multiple IDs?

You obviously haven't tugged my false beard.(she said in a
deliberately deep voice) cough

How far up on the NO FLY list are you?

The MIB's even stopped me from flying my video kite! (over the
Pentagon)
With as many secret service prostitutes running around naked, that's
fully understandable for our Pentagon bordello having a "no kite"
zone.


Did you know there are 4k (known) American security services?

How can the US possibly afford it? Answer: They obviously can't. The
country is drowning in debt. Why does the right wing complain about
big government and excessive taxes? Yet cheerfully subscribe to the
raving lunacy of 4000 different security services? If they each keep
secrets from each other (as they inevitably must, to maintain their
perceived value to the PTB) aren't they all endlessly duplicating each
other's activities? Who's coordinating these 4000 parallel information
channels into anything remotely useful for national security? Who is
watching the watchers who are watching the watcher's watcher's
watchers? And, if they are all working for the Government... who, the
hell, is doing any real work? The Chinese? It's completely nuts!!

4000 individual or unique security services is an impressive number,
and you are correct that we really never could afford it. Like I've
been saying all along, those Zionist Nazis (many of them rednecks)
along with their army of brown-nosed clowns, FUD-masters and minions
have been screwing with us from the very get go.

http://groups.google.com/groups/search
http://translate.google.com/#
Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet”

On Apr 22, 2:54*pm, Brad Guth wrote:

With as many secret service prostitutes running around naked, that's
fully understandable for our Pentagon bordello having a "no kite"
zone.

Good response! Though I think it was the naked MIBs _outside_ their
oddly-shaped bordello which caused the most red faces. I didn't know
where to look! :-)

Now we just have to work on the chronic racial abuse and rabid
paranoia. Yours. Not the MIB's. They're incurable.

One day at a time, eh? ;-)

On Apr 22, 8:13*am, "Chris.B" wrote:
On Apr 22, 2:54*pm, Brad Guth wrote:



With as many secret service prostitutes running around naked, that's
fully understandable for our Pentagon bordello having a "no kite"
zone.

Good response! Though I think it was the naked MIBs _outside_ their
oddly-shaped bordello which caused the most red faces. I didn't know
where to look! *:-)

Now we just have to work on the chronic racial abuse and rabid
paranoia. Yours. Not the MIB's. They're incurable.

One day at a time, eh? ;-)

Unlike you, I still only dislike them bad guys. Why is it my fault if
so many of them bad guys are Jewish Semites or redneck Atheists that
act/react exactly the same as any Zionist, and that practically none
of them are Muslims or radical Islamics?

Btw; besides those multiple odd shadow angles and all of that
unusually light gray and eroded or weathered rock issues. what’s that
little sphere above the horizon?
http://www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/ap...?AS15-85-11446

You do realize that the planet Venus would have been an extremely
bright sphere or crescent, so it's not Venus.

http://groups.google.com/groups/search
http://translate.google.com/#
Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet”

On Apr 22, 7:35*pm, Brad Guth wrote:

Unlike you, I still only dislike them bad guys.

My list of bad people easily exceeds yours. Mainly because I don't
filter them quite as strangely as you do.

what’s that little sphere above the horizon?
*http://www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/ap...?AS15-85-11446

These image are such low resolution that interpretation is difficult.
Have you tried enlarging that image? The sky is full of seemingly
random, darker blocks. The darkest of which cheerfully coincides with
your bright object. Then there is the matter of apparent image scale:
Isn't a 60mm lens on a 70mm Hasselblad likely to be rather wide
angle?

On Apr 22, 1:20*pm, "Chris.B" wrote:
On Apr 22, 7:35*pm, Brad Guth wrote:



Unlike you, I still only dislike them bad guys.

My list of bad people easily exceeds yours. Mainly because I don't
filter them quite as strangely as you do.
I only consider the really bad guys worth having whacked, or at least
given a stiff bounty on their heads.

Folks that are bad in order to get by or to bully their way through
life are not the really bad ones we need to be highly cautious about.
It's the upper caste of social/political and faith-based mafia types,
which includes Oligarchs and Rothschilds, that needs to be dealt with.


what’s that little sphere above the horizon?
*http://www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/ap...?AS15-85-11446

These image are such low resolution that interpretation is difficult.
Have you tried enlarging that image? The sky is full of seemingly
random, darker blocks. The darkest of which cheerfully coincides with
your bright object. Then there is the matter of apparent image scale:
Isn't a 60mm lens on a 70mm Hasselblad likely to be rather wide
angle?

Yes, it's a medium wide angle lens, but that little sphere item is not
Earth, or any likely lens refraction. The AOV is 50 degrees by 66
degrees diagonal.

Perhaps it's another wayward weather balloon.

http://groups.google.com/groups/search
http://translate.google.com/#
Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet”

On Apr 23, 12:52*am, Brad Guth wrote:

Yes, it's a medium wide angle lens, but that little sphere item is not
Earth, or any likely lens refraction. *The AOV is 50 degrees by 66
degrees diagonal.

Perhaps it's another wayward weather balloon.

What about the blocking in the dark sky? Any (non-paranoid)
thoughts? :-)

Blob identification aside.. the vacuum of the Moon must have required
rather special optics. The normal prescription assumes atmospheric air
on each side of all the exposed surfaces. The refractive index of air
is not that of a vacuum. This would probably require a complete
reworking of the lens prescription and probably unique, one-off
elements and perhaps lens housings too if the thickness of the
elements was much changed. A costly process. I have just found a page
on Wikipedia on the work involving Zeiss and Hasselblad for the lunar
cameras.

On Apr 23, 7:13*am, "Chris.B" wrote:
On Apr 23, 12:52*am, Brad Guth wrote:



Yes, it's a medium wide angle lens, but that little sphere item is not
Earth, or any likely lens refraction. *The AOV is 50 degrees by 66
degrees diagonal.

Perhaps it's another wayward weather balloon.

What about the blocking in the dark sky? Any (non-paranoid)
thoughts? :-)
Some of their color film frames include a few stars that they can't
seem to identify for us. Go figure, they could never manage to
include Venus or any other planet except an unusually pastel Earth.

Some of that dark sky indicated an having an ionized atmosphere of
some kind. PhotoShop helps to bring that out.


Blob identification aside.. the vacuum of the Moon must have required
rather special optics. The normal prescription assumes atmospheric air
on each side of all the exposed surfaces. The refractive index of air
is not that of a vacuum. This would probably require a complete
reworking of the lens prescription and probably unique, one-off
elements and perhaps lens housings too if the thickness of the
elements was much changed. A costly process. I have just found a page
on Wikipedia on the work involving Zeiss and Hasselblad for the lunar
cameras.

They had no extra-special lens coatings or much less any bandpass or
spectrum cutoff filtration, and their Kodak film wasn't even anything
special. Kodak and Hasselblad will not dare authenticate any of those
images for us, perhaps because it's not possible without those
flawless originals.

http://groups.google.com/groups/search
http://translate.google.com/#
Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet”

On Apr 23, 9:03*pm, Brad Guth wrote:
and their Kodak film wasn't even anything
special.

Not true. Do your homework. Even Wiki mentions Kodak's special, thin-
emulsion film. The lens which Zeiss helped produce for Hasseleblad's
lunar camera went on to become commercially available. The simplest
facts are often more interesting than creative knee-jerk cynicism and
paranoia. When you constantly wade up to your armpits in bull**** it
is difficult not to stain everything you post. Measure twice. Post
once.