A Hitchiker's Guide to the EINSTEIN HOAX

On Thu, 14 Apr 2011 00:50:40 +0100, "Androcles"
wrote:


"Henry Wilson DSc." ..@.. wrote in message
news | On Wed, 13 Apr 2011 23:47:23 +0100, "Androcles"
| wrote:

|
| Yep, it's called doppler shift and computing, not "around 9km/s" and
| not "about 5000 seconds".
| If we can compute the distance to a nearby star using parallax
| the position and time of a Saturnian moon should be a cinch.
|
| It isn't easy.

Sure it is. Just do a few simple sums.


| How the hell can parallax be used to determine position in an
| orbit with a five day period?
|
| Gawd you say some silly things!

Do you really think Proxima Centauri has a 5 day period?
Gawd you say some ****ing stupid things!


|
| What is the difference in parallax angle of an object 15000000000 kms away
| and one 15000000000.15 away, both coming straight towards us?
|
Don't ask me difficult questions, "Why don't you do a few simple sums." --
Henry Wilson.
Gawd you say some ****ing stupid things!


| ...and even if we could detect the difference, how would we know if we
were
| looking at its real position or a willusory one?

So how do you prove the velocity of light is source dependent?

this way
www.scisite.info/fig2.jpg

Do you seriously believe anyone is going to believe the drivel
you serve up when they ask you about it and you call them a
clueless *******, you clueless *******?

He called me a crackpot. So I called him a clueless *******....which he must
be if he raves mindlesly without doing the sums.

| What's one light-hour compared to several light-years?
|
| Why don't you do a few simple sums with real data, you clueless *******?
|
| ....silly old pommie ****pot...
|
| ....why don't you join the EPG?
"Why don't you do a few simple sums." -- Henry Wilson who can't a few
simple sums or even punctuate with a question mark.

I already knew you were a traitor and an Einsteinian mole. No need to
reinforce that.

"Henry Wilson DSc." ..@.. wrote in message
...
| On Thu, 14 Apr 2011 00:50:40 +0100, "Androcles"
| wrote:
|
|
| "Henry Wilson DSc." ..@.. wrote in message
| news | | On Wed, 13 Apr 2011 23:47:23 +0100, "Androcles"
| | wrote:
|
| |
| | Yep, it's called doppler shift and computing, not "around 9km/s" and
| | not "about 5000 seconds".
| | If we can compute the distance to a nearby star using parallax
| | the position and time of a Saturnian moon should be a cinch.
| |
| | It isn't easy.
|
| Sure it is. Just do a few simple sums.
|
|
| | How the hell can parallax be used to determine position in an
| | orbit with a five day period?
| |
| | Gawd you say some silly things!
|
| Do you really think Proxima Centauri has a 5 day period?
| Gawd you say some ****ing stupid things!
|
|
| |
| | What is the difference in parallax angle of an object 15000000000 kms
away
| | and one 15000000000.15 away, both coming straight towards us?
| |
| Don't ask me difficult questions, "Why don't you do a few simple
sums." --
| Henry Wilson.
| Gawd you say some ****ing stupid things!
|
|
| | ...and even if we could detect the difference, how would we know if we
| were
| | looking at its real position or a willusory one?
|
| So how do you prove the velocity of light is source dependent?
|
| this way
| www.scisite.info/fig2.jpg

Bwhahahahaha!
I have much better ways of adding waves:
http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/SinGen.xls

The pulse is 20 times faster than the wave:
http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonde...mWave20+21.gif



|
| Do you seriously believe anyone is going to believe the drivel
| you serve up when they ask you about it and you call them a
| clueless *******, you clueless *******?
|
| He called me a crackpot. So I called him a clueless *******....which he
must
| be if he raves mindlesly without doing the sums.

That's not the point. You are doing a Ken Seto, ranting and
raving, all words and no mathematics.

|
| | What's one light-hour compared to several light-years?
| |
| | Why don't you do a few simple sums with real data, you clueless
*******?
| |
| | ....silly old pommie ****pot...
| |
| | ....why don't you join the EPG?
| "Why don't you do a few simple sums." -- Henry Wilson who can't a few
| simple sums or even punctuate with a question mark.
|
| I already knew you were a traitor and an Einsteinian mole. No need to
| reinforce that.
|
Why don't you do a few simple sums with real data, you clueless *******?

On Thu, 14 Apr 2011 06:47:34 +0100, "Androcles"
wrote:


"Henry Wilson DSc." ..@.. wrote in message
.. .
| On Thu, 14 Apr 2011 00:50:40 +0100, "Androcles"
| wrote:
|
|
| "Henry Wilson DSc." ..@.. wrote in message
| news | | On Wed, 13 Apr 2011 23:47:23 +0100, "Androcles"
| | wrote:
|
| |
| | Yep, it's called doppler shift and computing, not "around 9km/s" and
| | not "about 5000 seconds".
| | If we can compute the distance to a nearby star using parallax
| | the position and time of a Saturnian moon should be a cinch.
| |
| | It isn't easy.
|
| Sure it is. Just do a few simple sums.
|
|
| | How the hell can parallax be used to determine position in an
| | orbit with a five day period?
| |
| | Gawd you say some silly things!
|
| Do you really think Proxima Centauri has a 5 day period?
| Gawd you say some ****ing stupid things!
|
|
| |
| | What is the difference in parallax angle of an object 15000000000 kms
away
| | and one 15000000000.15 away, both coming straight towards us?
| |
| Don't ask me difficult questions, "Why don't you do a few simple
sums." --
| Henry Wilson.
| Gawd you say some ****ing stupid things!
|
|
| | ...and even if we could detect the difference, how would we know if we
| were
| | looking at its real position or a willusory one?
|
| So how do you prove the velocity of light is source dependent?
|
| this way
| www.scisite.info/fig2.jpg

Bwhahahahaha!
I have much better ways of adding waves:
http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/SinGen.xls

The pulse is 20 times faster than the wave:
http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonde...mWave20+21.gif



|
| Do you seriously believe anyone is going to believe the drivel
| you serve up when they ask you about it and you call them a
| clueless *******, you clueless *******?
|
| He called me a crackpot. So I called him a clueless *******....which he
must
| be if he raves mindlesly without doing the sums.

That's not the point. You are doing a Ken Seto, ranting and
raving, all words and no mathematics.

|
| | What's one light-hour compared to several light-years?
| |
| | Why don't you do a few simple sums with real data, you clueless
*******?
| |
| | ....silly old pommie ****pot...
| |
| | ....why don't you join the EPG?
| "Why don't you do a few simple sums." -- Henry Wilson who can't a few
| simple sums or even punctuate with a question mark.
|
| I already knew you were a traitor and an Einsteinian mole. No need to
| reinforce that.
|
Why don't you do a few simple sums with real data, you clueless *******?

I just did the sums on Saturn's moons.

Can't you read?

"Henry Wilson DSc." ..@.. wrote in message
...
| On Thu, 14 Apr 2011 06:47:34 +0100, "Androcles"
| wrote:
|
|
| "Henry Wilson DSc." ..@.. wrote in message
| .. .
| | On Thu, 14 Apr 2011 00:50:40 +0100, "Androcles"
| | wrote:
| |
| |
| | "Henry Wilson DSc." ..@.. wrote in message
| | news | | | On Wed, 13 Apr 2011 23:47:23 +0100, "Androcles"
| | | wrote:
| |
| | |
| | | Yep, it's called doppler shift and computing, not "around 9km/s"
and
| | | not "about 5000 seconds".
| | | If we can compute the distance to a nearby star using parallax
| | | the position and time of a Saturnian moon should be a cinch.
| | |
| | | It isn't easy.
| |
| | Sure it is. Just do a few simple sums.
| |
| |
| | | How the hell can parallax be used to determine position in an
| | | orbit with a five day period?
| | |
| | | Gawd you say some silly things!
| |
| | Do you really think Proxima Centauri has a 5 day period?
| | Gawd you say some ****ing stupid things!
| |
| |
| | |
| | | What is the difference in parallax angle of an object 15000000000
kms
| away
| | | and one 15000000000.15 away, both coming straight towards us?
| | |
| | Don't ask me difficult questions, "Why don't you do a few simple
| sums." --
| | Henry Wilson.
| | Gawd you say some ****ing stupid things!
| |
| |
| | | ...and even if we could detect the difference, how would we know if
we
| | were
| | | looking at its real position or a willusory one?
| |
| | So how do you prove the velocity of light is source dependent?
| |
| | this way
| | www.scisite.info/fig2.jpg
|
| Bwhahahahaha!
| I have much better ways of adding waves:
| http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/SinGen.xls
|
| The pulse is 20 times faster than the wave:
| http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonde...mWave20+21.gif
|
|
|
| |
| | Do you seriously believe anyone is going to believe the drivel
| | you serve up when they ask you about it and you call them a
| | clueless *******, you clueless *******?
| |
| | He called me a crackpot. So I called him a clueless *******....which he
| must
| | be if he raves mindlesly without doing the sums.
|
| That's not the point. You are doing a Ken Seto, ranting and
| raving, all words and no mathematics.
|
| |
| | | What's one light-hour compared to several light-years?
| | |
| | | Why don't you do a few simple sums with real data, you clueless
| *******?
| | |
| | | ....silly old pommie ****pot...
| | |
| | | ....why don't you join the EPG?
| | "Why don't you do a few simple sums." -- Henry Wilson who can't a few
| | simple sums or even punctuate with a question mark.
| |
| | I already knew you were a traitor and an Einsteinian mole. No need to
| | reinforce that.
| |
| Why don't you do a few simple sums with real data, you clueless *******?
|
| I just did the sums on Saturn's moons.
|
| Can't you read?
|
I said real data, not "about 5000". You can't read.

"Henry Wilson DSc." wrote in message
...
These guys cannot get their heads around the fact that the late Rabbo's
grandson maintains our old website in his name and shares some of the
work.

What a load of crap

That means either you stole his work .. or he stole yours. One of you took
the others work and put your own name on it. Which is it .. who is the
thief and plagiarist .. it must be one of you .. unless you are a liar and
you and Ralph are the same person.

Also there is no way that a ten-year-old could be posting the things Ralph
(Rabbo) posts.

"hanson" wrote in message ...
.... ahahahaha... Varney, you don't get Henry's
core makeup-up and his fundamental beliefs.
= Henry lies without qualms, shame nor regrets.=

I very much get that that is Henry/Henri/Ralph's makeup. That is my point.
Thanks for agreeing.

And I'm not Varney (whoever that is/was). Please stop calling me by that
name.

[snip rest of quite funny stuff amongst some waffle]

On Apr 14, 9:06*am, "Inertial" wrote:
"hanson" *wrote in ...
.... ahahahaha... Varney, you don't get Henry's
core makeup-up and his fundamental beliefs.
= Henry lies without qualms, shame nor regrets.=

I very much get that that is Henry/Henri/Ralph's makeup. *That is my point.
Thanks for agreeing.

And I'm not Varney (whoever that is/was). *Please stop calling me by that
name.

[snip rest of quite funny stuff amongst some waffle]

Hanson is just like Androcles in that neither of them know anything,
but spend all day spewing regardless.

On Thu, 14 Apr 2011 15:16:53 -0700 (PDT), Eric Gisse
wrote:

On Apr 14, 9:06*am, "Inertial" wrote:
"hanson" *wrote in ...
.... ahahahaha... Varney, you don't get Henry's
core makeup-up and his fundamental beliefs.
= Henry lies without qualms, shame nor regrets.=

I very much get that that is Henry/Henri/Ralph's makeup. *That is my point.
Thanks for agreeing.

And I'm not Varney (whoever that is/was). *Please stop calling me by that
name.

[snip rest of quite funny stuff amongst some waffle]

Hanson is just like Androcles in that neither of them know anything,
but spend all day spewing regardless.

Hahahahhahahha!

That's funny coming from someone who knows nothing but spends all day
spewing regardless.

"Eric Gisse" wrote:
Varney "Inertial" wrote:
"hanson" wrote ..
.... ahahahaha... Varney, you don't get Henry's
core makeup-up and his fundamental beliefs.
= Henry lies without qualms, shame nor regrets.=

Varney wrote:
I very much get that that is Henry/Henri/Ralph's
makeup. That is my point. Thanks for agreeing.
And I'm not Varney (whoever that is/was).
Please stop calling me by that name.
[snip rest of quite funny stuff amongst some waffle]

Eric wrote:
Hanson is just like Androcles in that neither of them
know anything, but spend all day spewing regardless.

hanson wrote:
..... ahahahaha... poor boy! No BSc after 9 years in
college, no job, no prospects and now you try to
nuzzle in with the big boys... ahahahaha... Good one,
junior. But listen, Eric, from your NG behavior, it looks
more and more that your sorry state is from you
being a hardcore druggie who has been sidelined,
indefinitely.... Get a grip, junior.... ahahahahahanson

On Thu, 14 Apr 2011 16:42:58 -0700, "hanson" wrote:

.... ahahahaha... AHAHAHAHAHA... ahahaha...

"Henry Wilson DSc." ..@.. wrote:
"hanson" wrote:
Mike Varney "Inertial" wrote:

"Henry Wilson DSc." wrote:
These guys cannot get their heads around the fact that the late Rabbo's


hanson wrote:
See offer at the end of this post:

hanson wrote:
http://tinyurl.com/Enviro-Baby-Bait [1]
Green Child abusers prostitute & force a 4 (four) years old child, a
girl to plea: "Help the world" http://tinyurl.com/Enviro-Baby-Bait
This [1] is environmental child abuse perpetrated by followers
of Al Gore who left his wife of 40 years, only to scream at a
poor 54 year old woman who refused to masturbate Al Gore.
http://tinyurl.com/Al-Gore-Massage ...

=== There is nothing filthier than an environmentalist ====

and after Al Gore got globally hot and bothered he said:
http://skinnyreporter.com/goreglobalcooling.html :
|||| Al Gore said: man's use of fossil fuels is causing
|||| Al Gore said: catastrophic global COOLING.

========= There is nothing filthier then an environmentalist.
==== There is nothing more immoral then an environmentalist.
=== There is nothing more perverted then an environmentalist

That then is Henry for you.... ahahaha... ahahahahanson

Henry wrote:
It is apparent that paranoid mining engineers are even
more deranged and perverted than their arboreal equivalents.
Have a nice cup of tea, Hanson and keep on laughing....
even when they come to take you away.....
Hahahhahhahhahhahha!

hanson wrote:
The revelation of the green Bible must have touched
a sensitive Green Nerve in you, Henry. Time for
you to fess up.... ahahaha.. Now, till you so do, here
is a consolation prize for you Henry. It's part of the
post I dispatched via Centrocom this morning:

Earlier hanson wrote:
... Henry, the Palin- & the Paul woman YOU are bringing up
repeatedly now, are YOUR jerk-off templates & YOUR idols,
not mine... Enjoy your ******ing, but don't get any onto their
pictures you use. That would be environmentally unclean.

AFA your "5-kids from ALL female of the world" goes, that's
typically idiotic Green reasoning which all yet un-hung enviros
argue with. Only a tiny fraction of all females have 2+ kids.

I ran across that very Green argument the other day when my
ERM-Div (Environmental Resources and Mining) invited our
Australian Partner to Yucca Flats & Death Valley. We are
concluding, under the UN's auspices, a huge deal to bury all
the world's radioactive waste in Aussie land. It's big, Henry.

While enjoying the geology in Death Valley, one of the Aussie
scientists picked up, what seemed to him to be, an interesting
rock and he threw it into the Hummer.
Enter the accompaning BLM goon, a Green turd in uniform.
Said this green eco-idiot, in all earnestness, to the Aussie:
"Sir, I cannot allow you to remove that rock, because.
**** if all visitors would remove a rock then they would
carry the whole desert away *****."

Quite correct.
....but your generation of 'infinite-Earthers' cannot see that.

Henry, see now, why enviros should dangle by their necks
from trees?

....but there wont BE any trees if your generation of Tea Party misfits has
it way. You'll have to erect steel scaffolds because there wont be any wood.

So, get your act together, Henry. Here's the deal: Watch your
Aussie financial papers, Henry. Get in on the ground floor.
Take my info here like an insider trading tip. Take advantage
of it & it will get you out of your shabby & broken 1950 trailer
into a nice environmentally sound home. Good luck, Henry.

Till then, thanks for the laughs... ahahahaha... ahahahanson