![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
This article describes the plan to sell the orbiters minus engines
for $42 million: For sale: Used space shuttles. Asking price: $42 million apiece By John Matson Dec 18, 2008 04:00 PM in Space http://www.scientificamerican.com/bl...ing-2008-12-18 It is currently intended only to be sold to educational institutions, or governmental agencies. The Air Force is looking for designs for reusable first stage boosters for two-stage-to-orbit (TSTO) systems. Then it might be able to be used for this purpose. Most likely you would use kerosene fuel for this since dense fuels are more suitable for first stages. The payload bay would be converted to a fuel tank, and the second stage of the TSTO would be carried on top or below the orbiter. High performance kerosene engines such as the Russian NK-33, with a near legendary thrust/weight ratio of 136.66 to 1 at a weight of 1,222 kg, could be used for propulsion: NK-33. http://www.astronautix.com/engines/nk33.htm The orbiter without the SSME engines masses around 68,600 kg: Atlantis. http://www.astronautix.com/craft/atlantis.htm Its payload bay is around 300 cubic meters that could be used for propellant. Using the densities of kerosene and lox given he Lox/Kerosene. http://www.astronautix.com/props/loxosene.htm and the oxidizer to fuel ratio of the NK-33 of 2.8 to 1 we can calculate the propellant load that can be carried as about 300,000 kg. You would need at least 3 of the NK-33's to lift this fuel load, orbiter and second stage. The tank weight of kerosene/lox is typically around 1/100th of the propellant weight so around, 3,000 kg. Then the empty weight of the reconfigured orbiter would be 68,600kg + 3*1,222kg + 3,000kg = 75,266kg. And the fully fueled weight of this stage would be 375,266kg. For this first stage alone without a second stage, this would be a mass ratio of about 5. Using an average Isp of the NK-33 of 315 you could get a delta-V of 315*9.8*ln(5) = 4,970 m/s, about Mach 15. A total delta-V this high raises the possibility it could be used for suborbital space tourism or point-to-point hypersonic transport, if sale to commercial organizations were to be allowed. Bob Clark |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Space Tourism a con job? | Pat Flannery | Policy | 26 | December 22nd 09 08:33 PM |
will our space shuttle discovery and our international space stationbe safe from the space trash that the US and other counries earlier left upthere? | EverOnlyNice | Space Shuttle | 25 | September 10th 09 12:44 PM |
will our space shuttle discovery and our international space station be safe from the space trash that the US and other counries earlier left up there? | Jonathan | History | 1 | September 6th 09 12:51 AM |
Pictures Please - Space Shuttle - Space Shuttle Discovery - Space Shuttle Launch Picture | [email protected] | Space Shuttle | 3 | October 1st 07 09:54 PM |
space tourism | Fred Hapgood | Science | 6 | December 16th 05 03:54 PM |