![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
John Polasek wrote: snip I revise it to LY*mas = 3200. So for AlphaC it's mas = 3200/4 = 800 mas. You've got the idea, although 3260 is a better figure for the constant. According to Simbad, the Hipparcos parallax for Proxima Centauri is 772 +/- 2 mas; 3260/772 = 4.22 LY. For Rigil Kent it's 742 +/- 1 mas = 4.39 LY. Note that you can only use this method with precision when the angle is small, making the simple inverse function a good approximation to the cosecant. 1 pc = csc(0°0'1") AU ~= 206265 AU. 3600*180/pi ~= 206265. When calculated to high precision, the above two figures differ by about one part in 250 billion. -- Odysseus |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Planetary system around two stars... HW Vir | dlzc | Astronomy Misc | 11 | February 13th 09 03:41 AM |
Is it possible to have a planetary system with dozens of planets and hundreds of moons? | tracy | Astronomy Misc | 214 | January 19th 07 05:50 PM |
Planetary Classification System(s) | Willie R. Meghar | Amateur Astronomy | 5 | August 19th 06 07:37 PM |
setting up a cheap wireless planetary imaging system? | Frank Johnson | Amateur Astronomy | 15 | January 29th 06 12:45 AM |
Star composition and elements present in a planetary system | Brooklyn Red Leg | Science | 1 | December 26th 03 02:45 PM |