![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 4, 5:31 am, BradGuth wrote:
Why is Usenet/newsgroups essentially shutdown or trashed again? What’s the problem with those Google/NOVA servers, this time? The obvious newsgroup topics of mainstream damage-control as spewed gibberish, spam, smut and porn are intentionally not getting easily diverted out of the mainstream public groups, and this has always been breaking the backs and minds of those interested in sharing personal notions and ideas. However, the saturated use of media jamming via clownism isn’t hardly a new method of public crowd and opinion control, now is it. Clearly our Zionist/Nazi DARPA creators of Usenet have known better, although if their spooks and moles are going to have free access to sending and receiving their cloak and dagger messages and highly encrypted data via this global Usenet, means that the rest of us have to put up with a great deal of such crap. You’d think the entire community of “news.admin.net- abuse…..” (especially of their “MODERATED” chat groups) was actually worth something, though obviously it’s not worth squat, other than as yet another mainstream smoke-screen in order to make it look or otherwise seem as though this public Usenet/newsgroup is capable of being functional, when in fact it really never was intended to be anything but a backdoor for their sneaky cloak and dagger worth of global cold-war fun and games. Perhaps a 5th grade smuck of a code writing wizard can create a few nifty cyberbots that’ll seek out and easily divert or rid Usenet/ newsgroups of such obvious mainstream clownism and orchestrated debauchery. ~ Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth BG Weird as hell, as now we're getting robo generated new topics, so that the original topic along with all of the original contributors (mostly Rothschild spooks and moles of the Zionist/Nazi kind) gets to fall off the edge of Earth (so to speak) If that's not a hacked Usenet/newsgroup, then perhaps nothing is. From here on out, I'll have to remind myself and other folks to manually scan back in time in order to discover each of those original topics. ~ BG |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 4, 5:31 am, BradGuth wrote:
Why is Usenet/newsgroups essentially shutdown or trashed again? What’s the problem with those Google/NOVA servers, this time? The obvious newsgroup topics of mainstream damage-control as spewed gibberish, spam, smut and porn are intentionally not getting easily diverted out of the mainstream public groups, and this has always been breaking the backs and minds of those interested in sharing personal notions and ideas. However, the saturated use of media jamming via clownism isn’t hardly a new method of public crowd and opinion control, now is it. Clearly our Zionist/Nazi DARPA creators of Usenet have known better, although if their spooks and moles are going to have free access to sending and receiving their cloak and dagger messages and highly encrypted data via this global Usenet, means that the rest of us have to put up with a great deal of such crap. You’d think the entire community of “news.admin.net- abuse…..” (especially of their “MODERATED” chat groups) was actually worth something, though obviously it’s not worth squat, other than as yet another mainstream smoke-screen in order to make it look or otherwise seem as though this public Usenet/newsgroup is capable of being functional, when in fact it really never was intended to be anything but a backdoor for their sneaky cloak and dagger worth of global cold-war fun and games. Perhaps a 5th grade smuck of a code writing wizard can create a few nifty cyberbots that’ll seek out and easily divert or rid Usenet/ newsgroups of such obvious mainstream clownism and orchestrated debauchery. ~ Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth BG I see the usual Zionist/Nazi robo-postings by Naked Gonad and Eli Grubman are right back in the usual damage-control swing of things. And there’s not a peep of concern or consideration out of anyone other than myself. ~ BG |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
And once again we have more of the same old brown-nosed clownism
crapolla topics jamming up our Google/NOVA Usenet/newsgroups, and not an insider soul doing anything about it. Why am I not surprised that such public crowd damage-control tactics are still with us. ~ BG BradGuth wrote: Why is Usenet/newsgroups essentially shutdown or trashed again? What�s the problem with those Google/NOVA servers, this time? The obvious newsgroup topics of mainstream damage-control as spewed gibberish, spam, smut and porn are intentionally not getting easily diverted out of the mainstream public groups, and this has always been breaking the backs and minds of those interested in sharing personal notions and ideas. However, the saturated use of media jamming via clownism isn�t hardly a new method of public crowd and opinion control, now is it. Clearly our Zionist/Nazi DARPA creators of Usenet have known better, although if their spooks and moles are going to have free access to sending and receiving their cloak and dagger messages and highly encrypted data via this global Usenet, means that the rest of us have to put up with a great deal of such crap. You�d think the entire community of �news.admin.net- abuse�..� (especially of their �MODERATED� chat groups) was actually worth something, though obviously it�s not worth squat, other than as yet another mainstream smoke-screen in order to make it look or otherwise seem as though this public Usenet/newsgroup is capable of being functional, when in fact it really never was intended to be anything but a backdoor for their sneaky cloak and dagger worth of global cold-war fun and games. Perhaps a 5th grade smuck of a code writing wizard can create a few nifty cyberbots that�ll seek out and easily divert or rid Usenet/ newsgroups of such obvious mainstream clownism and orchestrated debauchery. ~ Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth BG |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 23, 10:55 am, BradGuth wrote:
And once again we have more of the same old brown-nosed clownism crapolla topics jamming up our Google/NOVA Usenet/newsgroups, and not an insider soul doing anything about it. Why am I not surprised that such public crowd damage-control tactics are still with us. ~ BG BradGuth wrote: Why is Usenet/newsgroups essentially shutdown or trashed again? What s the problem with those Google/NOVA servers, this time? The obvious newsgroup topics of mainstream damage-control as spewed gibberish, spam, smut and porn are intentionally not getting easily diverted out of the mainstream public groups, and this has always been breaking the backs and minds of those interested in sharing personal notions and ideas. However, the saturated use of media jamming via clownism isn t hardly a new method of public crowd and opinion control, now is it. Clearly our Zionist/Nazi DARPA creators of Usenet have known better, although if their spooks and moles are going to have free access to sending and receiving their cloak and dagger messages and highly encrypted data via this global Usenet, means that the rest of us have to put up with a great deal of such crap. You d think the entire community of news.admin.net- abuse .. (especially of their MODERATED chat groups) was actually worth something, though obviously it s not worth squat, other than as yet another mainstream smoke-screen in order to make it look or otherwise seem as though this public Usenet/newsgroup is capable of being functional, when in fact it really never was intended to be anything but a backdoor for their sneaky cloak and dagger worth of global cold-war fun and games. Perhaps a 5th grade smuck of a code writing wizard can create a few nifty cyberbots that ll seek out and easily divert or rid Usenet/ newsgroups of such obvious mainstream clownism and orchestrated debauchery. ~ Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth BG further proof: "Don't fret, Kanga, there's always the Paralympics!" ~ BG |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 24, 8:39 am, BradGuth wrote:
On Oct 23, 10:55 am, BradGuth wrote: And once again we have more of the same old brown-nosed clownism crapolla topics jamming up our Google/NOVA Usenet/newsgroups, and not an insider soul doing anything about it. Why am I not surprised that such public crowd damage-control tactics are still with us. ~ BG BradGuth wrote: Why is Usenet/newsgroups essentially shutdown or trashed again? What s the problem with those Google/NOVA servers, this time? The obvious newsgroup topics of mainstream damage-control as spewed gibberish, spam, smut and porn are intentionally not getting easily diverted out of the mainstream public groups, and this has always been breaking the backs and minds of those interested in sharing personal notions and ideas. However, the saturated use of media jamming via clownism isn t hardly a new method of public crowd and opinion control, now is it. Clearly our Zionist/Nazi DARPA creators of Usenet have known better, although if their spooks and moles are going to have free access to sending and receiving their cloak and dagger messages and highly encrypted data via this global Usenet, means that the rest of us have to put up with a great deal of such crap. You d think the entire community of news.admin.net- abuse .. (especially of their MODERATED chat groups) was actually worth something, though obviously it s not worth squat, other than as yet another mainstream smoke-screen in order to make it look or otherwise seem as though this public Usenet/newsgroup is capable of being functional, when in fact it really never was intended to be anything but a backdoor for their sneaky cloak and dagger worth of global cold-war fun and games. Perhaps a 5th grade smuck of a code writing wizard can create a few nifty cyberbots that ll seek out and easily divert or rid Usenet/ newsgroups of such obvious mainstream clownism and orchestrated debauchery. ~ Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth BG further proof: "Don't fret, Kanga, there's always the Paralympics!" ~ BG Even the most retarded 5th grader shouldn't have problems figuring this one out. Mainstream brown-nosed clowns = "Don't fret, Kanga, there's always the Paralympics!" It's what the rich and powerful do when nothing else is working. ~ BG |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 4, 4:31 am, BradGuth wrote:
Why is Usenet/newsgroups essentially shutdown or trashed again? What’s the problem with those Google/NOVA servers, this time? The obvious newsgroup topics of mainstream damage-control as spewed gibberish, spam, smut and porn are intentionally not getting easily diverted out of the mainstream public groups, and this has always been breaking the backs and minds of those interested in sharing personal notions and ideas. However, the saturated use of media jamming via clownism isn’t hardly a new method of public crowd and opinion control, now is it. Clearly our Zionist/Nazi DARPA creators of Usenet have known better, although if their spooks and moles are going to have free access to sending and receiving their cloak and dagger messages and highly encrypted data via this global Usenet, means that the rest of us have to put up with a great deal of such crap. You’d think the entire community of “news.admin.net- abuse…..” (especially of their “MODERATED” chat groups) was actually worth something, though obviously it’s not worth squat, other than as yet another mainstream smoke-screen in order to make it look or otherwise seem as though this public Usenet/newsgroup is capable of being functional, when in fact it really never was intended to be anything but a backdoor for their sneaky cloak and dagger worth of global cold-war fun and games. Perhaps a 5th grade smuck of a code writing wizard can create a few nifty cyberbots that’ll seek out and easily divert or rid Usenet/ newsgroups of such obvious mainstream clownism and orchestrated debauchery. ~ Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth BG In addition to all of the mainstream usual of brown-nosed clowns performing their Usenet/newsgroup damage-control tactics, for some reason our Google/NOVA Usenet (aka Google Groups) has been extensively offline, as in dragging its posting butt or simply getting itself remote moderated to death (probably something requested by the Rothschilds extended dynasty and their global partners in crimes against humanity, whereas you get to do as they say, or else). Of course political folks in full damage-control mode over this ongoing financial fiasco where the rich and powerful get richer and more powerful would not want my views or those of a few others to be heard either, so much so that for any number of reasons would have shut this public medium of free speech down. ~ Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth BG |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 4, 4:31 am, BradGuth wrote:
Why is Usenet/newsgroups essentially shutdown or trashed again? What’s the problem with those Google/NOVA servers, this time? The obvious newsgroup topics of mainstream damage-control as spewed gibberish, spam, smut and porn are intentionally not getting easily diverted out of the mainstream public groups, and this has always been breaking the backs and minds of those interested in sharing personal notions and ideas. However, the saturated use of media jamming via clownism isn’t hardly a new method of public crowd and opinion control, now is it. Clearly our Zionist/Nazi DARPA creators of Usenet have known better, although if their spooks and moles are going to have free access to sending and receiving their cloak and dagger messages and highly encrypted data via this global Usenet, means that the rest of us have to put up with a great deal of such crap. You’d think the entire community of “news.admin.net- abuse…..” (especially of their “MODERATED” chat groups) was actually worth something, though obviously it’s not worth squat, other than as yet another mainstream smoke-screen in order to make it look or otherwise seem as though this public Usenet/newsgroup is capable of being functional, when in fact it really never was intended to be anything but a backdoor for their sneaky cloak and dagger worth of global cold-war fun and games. Perhaps a 5th grade smuck of a code writing wizard can create a few nifty cyberbots that’ll seek out and easily divert or rid Usenet/ newsgroups of such obvious mainstream clownism and orchestrated debauchery. ~ Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth BG What's up with the "Don't fret, Kanga, there's always the Paralympics!? Why all the duplicate postings of that same title? Mainstream brown-nosed clownism going postal? It's entirely obvious that "Don't fret, Kanga, there's always the Paralympics!" is purely of mainstream brown-nosed clownism (most likely Rothschild and republican Mafia fortified), and otherwise most likely why the functionality of Google Groups goes into the nearest toilet from time to time. It even seems more robo-posting or cyberbot like than not. If you want a quicker response, just post whatever to my "Guth Usenet" http://groups.google.com/group/guth-usenet?hl=en ~ Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth BG / “Guth Usenet” |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 30, 5:07 am, BradGuth wrote:
On Oct 4, 4:31 am, BradGuth wrote: Why is Usenet/newsgroups essentially shutdown or trashed again? What’s the problem with those Google/NOVA servers, this time? The obvious newsgroup topics of mainstream damage-control as spewed gibberish, spam, smut and porn are intentionally not getting easily diverted out of the mainstream public groups, and this has always been breaking the backs and minds of those interested in sharing personal notions and ideas. However, the saturated use of media jamming via clownism isn’t hardly a new method of public crowd and opinion control, now is it. Clearly our Zionist/Nazi DARPA creators of Usenet have known better, although if their spooks and moles are going to have free access to sending and receiving their cloak and dagger messages and highly encrypted data via this global Usenet, means that the rest of us have to put up with a great deal of such crap. You’d think the entire community of “news.admin.net- abuse…..” (especially of their “MODERATED” chat groups) was actually worth something, though obviously it’s not worth squat, other than as yet another mainstream smoke-screen in order to make it look or otherwise seem as though this public Usenet/newsgroup is capable of being functional, when in fact it really never was intended to be anything but a backdoor for their sneaky cloak and dagger worth of global cold-war fun and games. Perhaps a 5th grade smuck of a code writing wizard can create a few nifty cyberbots that’ll seek out and easily divert or rid Usenet/ newsgroups of such obvious mainstream clownism and orchestrated debauchery. ~ Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth BG What's up with the "Don't fret, Kanga, there's always the Paralympics!? Why all the duplicate postings of that same title? Mainstream brown-nosed clownism going postal? It's entirely obvious that "Don't fret, Kanga, there's always the Paralympics!" is purely of mainstream brown-nosed clownism (most likely Rothschild and republican Mafia fortified), and otherwise most likely why the functionality of Google Groups goes into the nearest toilet from time to time. It even seems more robo-posting or cyberbot like than not. If you want a quicker response, just post whatever to my "Guth Usenet" http://groups.google.com/group/guth-usenet?hl=en ~ Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth BG / “Guth Usenet” Clearly most every Usenet contributor to the multiple/duplicate topics of "Don't fret, Kanga, there's always the Paralympics!" is a cyberbot, robo-posting and/or entirely bogus. Even halfwit 5th graders would have known this and could have devised a simple method of the Google Groups simply diverting such clearly bogus topics to the "alt.astronomy.spam" group. Of course the other 99.9% of Usenet/newsgroup active members don't actually care how trashed and unfunctional Google Groups gets, perhaps because it's their very own kind doing the topic/author stalking and Usenet traumatizing. ~ Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth BG / “Guth Usenet” |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 4, 4:31 am, BradGuth wrote:
Why is Usenet/newsgroups essentially shutdown or trashed again? What’s the problem with those Google/NOVA servers, this time? The obvious newsgroup topics of mainstream damage-control as spewed gibberish, spam, smut and porn are intentionally not getting easily diverted out of the mainstream public groups, and this has always been breaking the backs and minds of those interested in sharing personal notions and ideas. However, the saturated use of media jamming via clownism isn’t hardly a new method of public crowd and opinion control, now is it. Clearly our Zionist/Nazi DARPA creators of Usenet have known better, although if their spooks and moles are going to have free access to sending and receiving their cloak and dagger messages and highly encrypted data via this global Usenet, means that the rest of us have to put up with a great deal of such crap. You’d think the entire community of “news.admin.net- abuse…..” (especially of their “MODERATED” chat groups) was actually worth something, though obviously it’s not worth squat, other than as yet another mainstream smoke-screen in order to make it look or otherwise seem as though this public Usenet/newsgroup is capable of being functional, when in fact it really never was intended to be anything but a backdoor for their sneaky cloak and dagger worth of global cold-war fun and games. Perhaps a 5th grade smuck of a code writing wizard can create a few nifty cyberbots that’ll seek out and easily divert or rid Usenet/ newsgroups of such obvious mainstream clownism and orchestrated debauchery. ~ Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth BG Are the truly rich and powerful trying out every dirty trick within their Old Testament, in order to terminate or otherwise trash Google Groups (public newsgroups)? In alt.astronomy plus a few typically spook/mole and rabbi accessory groups, what's up with the "Don't fret, Kanga, there's always the Paralympics!? Why all the duplicate postings of that same title, with loads of bogus replies? Is our mainstream brown-nosed clownism going postal on us? It's entirely obvious that the bogus topic of "Don't fret, Kanga, there's always the Paralympics!" is purely of mainstream brown-nosed clownism (most likely Rothschild and republican Mafia fortified), and otherwise most likely why the functionality of Google Groups goes into the nearest toilet from time to time. It even seems a whole lot more robo-posting or cyberbot like sustained than not. If any of you should want a quicker chat response (especially when Google/NOVA Groups is getting dragged down for the count), just post whatever to my "Guth Usenet". http://groups.google.com/group/guth-usenet?hl=en I’ll only moderate “Guth Usenet” or banish those intent upon spoiling everything in sight if it starts getting into topic/author stalking, and otherwise if it’s getting brown-nosed clown traumatized. ~ Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth BG / “Guth Usenet” |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "BradGuth" wrote in message ... On Oct 4, 4:31 am, BradGuth wrote: Why is Usenet/newsgroups essentially shutdown or trashed again? snip GuthBall drivel I’ll only moderate “Guth Usenet” or banish those intent upon spoiling everything in sight if it starts getting into topic/author stalking, and otherwise if it’s getting brown-nosed clown traumatized. ~ Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth BG / “Guth Usenet” Say, GuthBall, did you and Alexa Cameron attend the same school for retarded wana-be UseNet denizens? You almost sound alike and you do come up with the same loony conspiracy delusions she is suffering under. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
(",) Good News for Google Groups, Usenet and Other Users | [email protected] | Amateur Astronomy | 2 | February 1st 05 03:07 PM |
(",) Good News for Google Groups, Usenet and Other Users | [email protected] | Amateur Astronomy | 4 | January 29th 05 06:32 PM |
(",) Good News for Google Groups, Usenet and Other Users | [email protected] | Amateur Astronomy | 1 | January 29th 05 07:44 AM |
(",) Good News for Google Groups, Usenet and Other Users | [email protected] | History | 1 | January 29th 05 06:59 AM |
(",) Good News for Google Groups, Usenet and Other Users | [email protected] | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | January 29th 05 05:37 AM |