A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Space Science » Policy
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Nesting Fractal Dimensions With Additive Cellular Automata in the 7-DTorus



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old August 18th 08, 07:41 AM posted to sci.space.policy,alt.sci.physics,alt.politics.usa.constitution,sci.physics
American
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,224
Default FTL Propulsion: FROM AND FOR ONLY the Sovereign andConstitutionalized Citizens of the U.S.

: Occasionally the 'bot's author 'American' greps for
: keywords like"'bot" in the reply stream, then inter-
: jects a handtyped note to keep up the illusion that
: he actually writes everything logged under his nym,
: when in reality he merely programmed the 'bot with
: its word-salad ingredients.

You confuse "bot" for a quite righteous indignation
because you do not know or understand the spirit
that drives it, less the force of knowledge that is
given to those who thirst for it.

Let Webster rule the bot, and let not the absence of
borders or the multiplicity of cultures replace the
spirit of entrepreneurialism in America.

But it sounds like you're quick to assume those 'bot'
types having no real substance to twirl your stick into.

To me, it's not about little garage kits on a bench
that's never going to lead the way into revolutionary
science - it's about creating the right kinds of
channels for the science to get "applied".

You can complain all you want to about people having
too many "word salads" to contribute, but you're
giving absolutely no creedence to the huge volume of
application science teeming all over usenet.

The "current" industry doesn't ever get the chance to
ever adopt a technology because IMO there's just too
many interests being discussed while the most valuable
scientific research gets *squelched*.

:
: 'American' also goes with the idiotic assumption of
: so many anti-Relativists in the sci hierarchy that
: Uncle Al is a staunch defender of Einstein at all
: costs, which COMPLETELY ignores the fact that Unc
: has, unlike any/all of them, has actually designed
: an experiment that if done, could completely falsify
: all of Einstein's work in one swell foop.

Wrong assumption.

If you've got the educational credentials to supplement
your understanding of a theory of operation, then I
suppose that (a) You've attended an "established"
type institution or school and became, in the process,
ignorant of the science of aether physics. (b) Since
many anti-Jews seem to have jumped on the bandwagon
of aether physics and have become overly invali-
dation-prone to Einsteinian GR (and I never said I
wasn't) you assume that "fringe" posters like myself
are so far "aetheristic" that we'ew either "lunatic"
or "anti-Einstein". Nothing could be further from the
truth, and your idealization on this seems to be
quite commonplace.

You're trying to "whitewash" anything that doesn't
smack of establishment physics, which is, in most
cases the NWO rule, if not the huge exception to
the real, scientifically intuitive way iof thinking.

:
: 'American' has the "if you ain't with me you's agin'
: me" mindset in common with so very many anti-Relativist
: netLoons, which is revealed when he claims I slavishly
: side with Uncle Al when a short session with Google
: would disprove that.
:
Read last comment.

: I suppose it's way too late in 'American's' downward
: spiral of mental disintegration (evidenced by his
: stirring together last week's cutting-edge scientific
: ideas, seasoned with a strong dose of 'fringey' stuff,
: in his psychoceramic word-salad bowl) for him to
: consider boiling his 'ideas' (if any) down to something
: simply testable with a benchtop apparatus.
:
Let's just assume for a minute that your bragging rights
are "superior" to my word salad "bot" postings. If they
are, then you'd have to take me to task over anything
I've posted in this thread.

Therefore, is there anything in this thread that
remains a bone of contention with your supposed
experimentations or are you just spamming here?

: I mean, Unc is trying to grow flawless benzil
: crystals big enough to unambiguously show that spacetime
: has a definite handedness so's he can bitchslap Einstein
: with Mother Nature's own left hand.
:
I don't suppose that Google is the forum for you to
go into detail about anything that might hinder your
progress, although you just might be trolling here.

Unless you've got some real engineering data to back
your ideas up, you ain't going nowhere.

: I'm trying to find time between working for a living
: and 'having a life' to build a powered device based on
: the principles of Forward's Gravity Gradiometer that I
: think will be able to generate not just nearly
: indetectable feeble near-field gravitons, but an
: efficient, robust ship-driving far-field flux.
:
: What has 'American' got in the actual, physical,
: pipeline?

May I suggest that some of these "bot" type researchers
are processing more of their 99% sweat theory into their work,
and forming mathematical models, than building their 1%
trial-and-error prototypes, and not having any of them come
into fruition first as marketable IDEAS?

(what a zero)


: I'm putting my lathe where my mouth is. What YOU
: got, bot-boy?
:
: Mark L. Fergerson

Stick to the data, Mack.
This isn't craft, it's a science.

REFLECTION DATA FROM THE DECOMPRESSING REGIME

Research into the Bi89 Crystallographic data for
"reflection" files might consist of one line per
reflection in FORMAT(3I4,2F8.2,I4) for h,k,l,F_o^2,
sigma(F_o^2), and batch number. The "batch number"
refers to groups of data sets.

A different batch might contain a separate scale
factor, which might be refined by determining the
fractional contributions of the k-shadows listed as
k2, k3, ..., so that the total fractional
contribution might be:

( 1 - k2 - k3 - ... )

Simple cases represent a single value for the
k-shadow for "coincident lattices". (Where there is
NO reflection order, the batch number order is not
used). An instruction file can specify the format
of the k-shadow batch file, and apply necessary
scale factors and reorientation matrices.

THEORY OF OPERATION

30-35 THz represents the HF element of resonant
excitation energy able to screen out the degenerative
effects of noise, decompress the fringefield, and
simultaneously cushion 600 USARTS [5] while
retaining LF EM HARMONIC container w/ white noise
envelope, INTERIOR to the craft's hull. The white
noise envelope acts as a screen for conscious
projection, entraining some harmonic delta and
theta as the lightbodies in zero time.


American


The expense of spirit in a waste of shame is lust
in action - Sonnet 129, Shakespeare
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
fractal universe ?? Block Misc 7 March 4th 07 09:44 PM
Fractal formula for alpha. Did ancients know more than we do? [email protected] Misc 0 September 12th 06 07:12 PM
Cubic Space and Fractal Particles Mad Scientist Misc 0 August 26th 04 06:59 AM
New Fractal Theory of the Cosmos Mad Scientist Misc 3 August 11th 04 08:23 AM
Automata and sending out own signal Anthony Cerrato SETI 75 November 15th 03 09:55 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:58 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.