The Secret Pixels of Venus / by Brad Guth

On Mar 2, 10:00 pm, Saul Levy wrote:
******* doesn't fit, Brad! lmao!

Saul Levy

Without word games, it's just not fun being such a pretend-atheist
these cloak and dagger days, is it.

Here's a little extra story that's somewhat multi-tasking in order to
suit my kind of open mindset.

You can't hardly retool squat if everything that's in need of being
made new and improved has to remain as forever based entirely upon
sustaining the hocus-pocus past of intellectual illusions, and
otherwise of accepting official hype and disinformation that's
intended to primarily benefit the pretend-atheist rich and powerful
(including the NASA/Apollo O-Ring cult). However, it seems not even
the all-knowing expertise of our Willie.Moo can manage to save us from
ourselves, because what's done is done and forever such history can't
be revised to reflect the truth. JFK and a few others found that out
the hard way.

For one example of what's technically doable, is that we don't even
have to retool all that much for accomplishing Venus with good
robotics. Doing Venus is essentially a KIS(keep it simple) mission,
that's only improved upon once having also established a Venus L2
platform (a good location for the secondary management of TRACE-II).

I'm into rethinking the geothermally toasty environment of Venus could
be one of those trial and error applications of intelligent design, or
it could be more likely of the basic applications of ET intelligence
along with their applied physics that's simply hard at work extracting
whatever or doing their own interplanetary thing, as best they can.

Folks within this extensively anti-think-tank of Usenet need to
appreciate that terrestrial limited evolution is simply not the one
and only alternative, nor is whatever God or intelligent design the
one and only path of evolution advancing in spite of all odds.
However, having some intelligent control or management over the future
of ones DNA/RNA code seems like a perfectly good plan of action,
especially if you were of an advanced enough ET that's out and about
spreading the seeds of such complex life, be it merely assisting
panspermia or directly having deposited those seeds of complex DNA/RNA
to the intended target.

In spite of what we've been told over and over by those having "the
right stuff", there's always more eye-popping and mind-blowing grief,
shock and awe to behold if into uncovering the whole truth and nothing
but the truth is the focus or intent of what honest folks are having
to share and share alike as best we can. Physics and science is not
about each and every one of us being entirely right 100% of the time,
such as being merely 1% right about 3He/fusion is clearly 1% better
off than not having made the effort in the first place, because 1%
begets 2% and so forth until the task or goal is accomplished.

I'd have to go along with the "informational associativity" / by
Wallace Wright, as an analogy or notion of what most of these pretend
atheists of Usenet nayism continually impose, as their swarm mindset
of infomercial spewed science, that's usually on behalf of sustaining
their mainstream status quo at all cost, and without so much as any
speck of remorse or regard for whatever collateral consequences seems
perfectly par for their course of actions taken, whereas their means
always justifies their actions, or vise versa, and where the past no
longer counts as long as it can't ever be revised in order to reflect
the actual truth.

As an example of others sharing the whole truth and nothing but the
truth:

SECRETS of the TEMPLE / by William Greider (an oldy but goody as of
1989)

This informative book tells a not so little story about our Federal
Reserve, and of the era when the nearly intolerable "oil shock" gouge
per gallon was only $1.25, and that's only when and if even
available. Energy inflation has never been quit the same ever since
that Federal Reserve orchestrated fiasco took place. So, our
William.Moo (aka William Mook) is correct, in that secret groups of
individuals do in fact control most everything that counts, allowing
those of us servitude minions to go about our business unaware of the
cloak and dagger methods in charge of who gets what and of who doesn't
get squat, such as access to nearly unlimited loot at 2% annual
interest doesn't go out to just anyone as having a viable plan of
action.

Even the very best of educated Americans live a warm and fuzzy life of
illusions, such as having to accept that our "Federal Reserve" as
actually having nothing whatsoever to do with anything federal, and
therefore by rights should be renamed as our entirely Private Reserve
Banking Cartel. According to the whole truth and nothing but the
truth about this "Private Reserve Bank" cartel that's cloaked and
otherwise highly benefited as our "Federal Reserve", whereas they
alone determine whatever shall exceed or fail, be it government or
private. And to think if Hitler were alive he'd be very much grinning
from ear to ear, much like that Cheshire Cat from Alice In Wonderland,
as well as pleasing to most every other Zionist mindset that's on the
exact same global domination page as Hitler or of whatever replacement
warlord comes along.
.. - Brad Guth

The geothermal heat loss of Venus is truly impressive, not to mention
rather telling of a somewhat newish planet that's in the proto-Earth
stage or era, of the natural planetology doing its thing of cooling
off the best it can.

There is nothing of physics or via the best available cache of
existing science that forbids or otherwise excludes the potential of
Venus hosting other intelligent life, be that of a local evolved
species or especially on behalf of an ET (including us, though not in
the buff) kind of sufficient intelligence that's perfectly capable of
existing/coexisting on Venus. Surviving the toasty geothermal forced
environment of Venus is simply not insurmountable for anything but as
interpreted by those faith-based diehard nayism folks that simply
can't ever admit to being wrong.

An Alternate View of Venus / by John Ackerman
http://www.firmament-chaos.com/papers/fvenuspaper.pdf
has this peer replicated science of thermal energy balance, on behalf
of the surplus energy outflow pegged at 21 w/m2, but I recall having
also seen this published as 20 w/m2, as well as other published
science as specifying upon the solar influx reaching the surface being
of less than 150 w/m2 out of the 2625~2660 w/m2 is not greater than
5.66% of solar potential, and much of which gets through to that
already toasty surface isn't even of the IR spectrum, and of course
you'd have to divide that in half because the nighttime season is not
exactly absorbing squat worth of solar photons.

The Planet Venus / By David Harry Grinspoon is yet another well enough
published resource of old but viable data that tells us we haven't a
purely atmospheric solar-induced greenhouse situation, even though
critical science data from multiple probes had been intentionally
removed/excluded so as to continually benefit the original solar-
atmospheric greenhouse as the one and only consideration, because
Venus is supposed to be of the exact same age and origin as Earth, as
having been stipulated by those faith-based conditional laws of
physics.

David Grinspoon quotes: http://thinkexist.com/quotes/david_grinspoon/
"We're ignorant of life in the universe. We only have one planet that
serves as an example and in science it's not good to derive
information from a sample size of one."

"We need more Venus missions to really answer the biggest mysteries
about the planet. Venus Express will be a great mission and will tell
us a lot about the planet, but I think to really make the next leaps
in understanding Venus we're going to have to do something more than
just orbit the planet. We need to take the plunge and explore the
clouds and the surface directly."

"They might do photosynthesis in the ultraviolet as opposed to the
visual spectrum. It's a tremendous amount of energy if you can make
use of it instead of being killed by it. It's unusual, but natural
selection makes the best out of adversity."

Often such worthy tidbits of scientific truths about Venus have been
published within Nature.com, then forever banished away from the
educational mindset that simply can't ever be allowed to revise squat
without breaking wind and igniting such. ESA's Venus EXPRESS is
keeping unusually quiet these days, as though there's a whole lot more
to the Venus thermal energy balance than had ever been allowed into
the mainstream, as to ponder along with any degree of our deductive
reasoning is apparently a big taboo.
.. - Brad Guth


On Feb 26, 10:16 pm, BradGuth wrote:
Thanks again to our once upon a time Usenet contributor "tomcat", for
having posted the optional link to this updated page ofVenussurface
images.

http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/th...humbnails.html

Some of the most interesting AI worthy information can be found within
image No.17 from the top left, as within the 225 m/pixel composite
frame of such radar obtained pixels that just so happens to include
the robust, rather sizable and somewhat complex community of 'GUTHVenus', of which you should apply your very own PhotoShop/resampling
enlargement of at least 3X, along with using whatever unsharp mask
filter plus other image cleaning or treatment options you'd care to
apply. Remember, that a purely negative or naysay mindset of a true
rusemaster simply can not accomplish such PhotoShop enlargements
without making the image look worse off than it really is

"Lava channels, Lo Shen Valles,Venusfrom Magellan Cycle 1"http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/html/object_page/mgn_c115s095_1.htmlhttp://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/hires/mgn_c115s095_1.gif

If you still can not find this complex community of interesting
pixels, then
you are not nearly as good at observationology as you think you are.
- Brad Guth -

In order to revise the official word of God (aka NASA), about how hot
and nasty the planet Venus actually has been from the bottom up, for
that to happen, one needs to appreciate the geothermal heat loss of
Venus is truly impressive, not to mention rather telling of a somewhat
newish formulated planet that's in the proto-Earth era, of the natural
planetology doing its long drawn out thing of cooling off the best it
can.

There is nothing of physics or via the best available cache of
existing science that forbids or otherwise excludes the potential of
Venus hosting other intelligent life, be that of a local evolved
species or especially on behalf of an ET (including us, though not in
the buff) kind of sufficient intelligence that's perfectly capable of
existing/coexisting on Venus. Surviving the toasty geothermal forced
environment of Venus is simply not insurmountable for anything but as
interpreted by those faith-based diehard nayism folks that simply
can't ever admit to being wrong.

An Alternate View of Venus / by John Ackerman
http://www.firmament-chaos.com/papers/fvenuspaper.pdf
has this peer replicated science of thermal energy balance, on behalf
of the surplus energy outflow pegged at 21 w/m2, but I recall having
also seen this published as 20 w/m2, as well as other published
science as specifying upon the solar influx reaching the surface being
of less than 150 w/m2 out of the 2625~2660 w/m2 is not greater than
5.66% of solar potential, and much of which gets through to that
already toasty surface isn't even of the IR spectrum, and of course
you'd have to divide that in half because the nighttime season is not
exactly absorbing squat worth of solar photons.

The Planet Venus / By David Harry Grinspoon is yet another well enough
published resource of old but viable data that tells us we haven't a
purely atmospheric solar-induced greenhouse situation, even though
critical science data from multiple probes had been intentionally
removed/excluded so as to continually benefit the original solar-
atmospheric greenhouse as the one and only consideration, because
Venus is supposed to be of the exact same age and origin as Earth, as
having been stipulated by those faith-based conditional laws of
physics.

David Grinspoon quotes: http://thinkexist.com/quotes/david_grinspoon/
"We're ignorant of life in the universe. We only have one planet that
serves as an example and in science it's not good to derive
information from a sample size of one."

"We need more Venus missions to really answer the biggest mysteries
about the planet. Venus Express will be a great mission and will tell
us a lot about the planet, but I think to really make the next leaps
in understanding Venus we're going to have to do something more than
just orbit the planet. We need to take the plunge and explore the
clouds and the surface directly."

"They might do photosynthesis in the ultraviolet as opposed to the
visual spectrum. It's a tremendous amount of energy if you can make
use of it instead of being killed by it. It's unusual, but natural
selection makes the best out of adversity."

Often such worthy tidbits of scientific truths about Venus have been
published within Nature.com, then forever banished away from the
educational mindset that simply can't ever be allowed to revise squat
without breaking wind and igniting such. ESA's Venus EXPRESS is
keeping unusually quiet these days, as though there's a whole lot more
to the Venus thermal energy balance than had ever been allowed into
the mainstream, as to ponder along with any degree of our deductive
reasoning is apparently a big taboo.
.. - Brad Guth


On Feb 26, 10:16 pm, BradGuth wrote:
Thanks again to our once upon a time Usenet contributor "tomcat", for
having posted the optional link to this updated page of Venus surface
images.

http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/th...humbnails.html

Some of the most interesting AI worthy information can be found within
image No.17 from the top left, as within the 225 m/pixel composite
frame of such radar obtained pixels that just so happens to include
the robust, rather sizable and somewhat complex community of 'GUTH
Venus', of which you should apply your very own PhotoShop/resampling
enlargement of at least 3X, along with using whatever unsharp mask
filter plus other image cleaning or treatment options you'd care to
apply. Remember, that a purely negative or naysay mindset of a true
rusemaster simply can not accomplish such PhotoShop enlargements
without making the image look worse off than it really is

"Lava channels, Lo Shen Valles, Venus from Magellan Cycle 1"http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/html/object_page/mgn_c115s095_1.htmlhttp://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/hires/mgn_c115s095_1.gif

If you still can not find this complex community of interesting
pixels, then
you are not nearly as good at observationology as you think you are.
- Brad Guth -

On Feb 27, 1:16*am, BradGuth wrote:
Thanks again to our once upon a time Usenet contributor "tomcat", for
having posted the optional link to this updated page of Venus surface
images.

http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/th...humbnails.html

Some of the most interesting AI worthy information can be found within
image No.17 from the top left, as within the 225 m/pixel composite
frame of such radar obtained pixels that just so happens to include
the robust, rather sizable and somewhat complex community of 'GUTH
Venus', of which you should apply your very own PhotoShop/resampling
enlargement of at least 3X, along with using whatever unsharp mask
filter plus other image cleaning or treatment options you'd care to
apply. *Remember, that a purely negative or naysay mindset of a true
rusemaster simply can not accomplish such PhotoShop enlargements
without making the image look worse off than it really is

"Lava channels, Lo Shen Valles, Venus from Magellan Cycle 1"http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/html/object_page/mgn_c115s095_1.htmlhttp://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/hires/mgn_c115s095_1.gif

If you still can not find this complex community of interesting
pixels, then
you are not nearly as good at observationology as you think you are.
- Brad Guth -

On Mar 7, 3:47 am, wrote:
On Feb 27, 1:16 am, BradGuth wrote:

Thanks again to our once upon a time Usenet contributor "tomcat", for
having posted the optional link to this updated page of Venus surface
images.

http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/th...humbnails.html

Some of the most interesting AI worthy information can be found within
image No.17 from the top left, as within the 225 m/pixel composite
frame of such radar obtained pixels that just so happens to include
the robust, rather sizable and somewhat complex community of 'GUTH
Venus', of which you should apply your very own PhotoShop/resampling
enlargement of at least 3X, along with using whatever unsharp mask
filter plus other image cleaning or treatment options you'd care to
apply. Remember, that a purely negative or naysay mindset of a true
rusemaster simply can not accomplish such PhotoShop enlargements
without making the image look worse off than it really is

"Lava channels, Lo Shen Valles, Venus from Magellan Cycle 1"http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/html/object_page/mgn_c115s095_1.htm...

If you still can not find this complex community of interesting
pixels, then
you are not nearly as good at observationology as you think you are.
- Brad Guth -

Thanks for that generic update, as that always helps keeping this one
near the top of the Usenet stack.

I've also restarted this one as: Secret Pixels of Venus / by Brad
Guth
.. - BG