Why is the moon BLUE ?

On Dec 21, 9:30 am, BradGuth wrote:
The Moon is not actually BLUE, except to the unfiltered eye. A good
orange/amber worth of an optical spectrum filter (as added onto their
otherwise bandpass coated lens) would have permitted a somewhat more
natural color looking moon, as though viewed from Earth by using a
quality telescope that's getting extensively filtered by our polluted
atmosphere and secondly by the rather extensive 8r(8X radius) worth of
sodium atmosphere associated with that moon.

However, it looks as though we're still being lied to again and again
by NASA's rusemasters in charge of snookering humanity for all it's
worth. In other words, it seems their MI5/CIA boss or MIB agent in
charge of damage control that's likely standing directly behind each
operator of all those spendy supercomputer work stations (with a
loaded gun pointed at each of their empty heads) is not about to allow
any public Usenet chat about our physically dark and such an unusually
blue moon, or much less about how their NASA and of those rad-hard
Apollo wizards, along with all that Semitic Third Reich kind of right
stuff as having so nicely managed to always avoid those blue saturated
hues as well as their having always hidden Venus at the same time.

JAXA / SELENE (KAGUYA)http://www.selene.jaxa.jp/en/communi...ion_e.htm#NEW_...

Notice their intentional color removal of the moon itself, and of
those very same images as otherwise depicting mother Earth in full
color. (it's quite easy to prove this being the case)

Down on the same page are those other original full color images of
mostly the moon itself along with parts of the their spacecraft as
depicted within such a nifty bluish saturation hue. Remember that
Selene's quality optics had been custom bandpass coated in order to
cut out the vast bulk of UV and IR to start with.

The rather impressive blue saturated hue or color skewed amount of
color tint is clearly that of an expected color shift or blue
saturated image result, that's unavoidably their CCD obtained result
of the raw secondary/recoil worth of what most such reactive items as
getting UV saturated should always look like to such a bandpass
filtered CCD w/o having the necessary color correction filter, as
otherwise especially blue saturated as to that of what any unfiltered
Kodak film recorded image (via NASA/Apollo) should have depicted.

Unfortunately, the JAXA "KAGUYA Image Gallery" that's apparently
forever stuck with using the "Adobe(R) Flash Player(R)" is what
seriously sucks, as sharing far less than full resolution and
otherwise running extremely poorly on most computers w/o a super fast
internet connection and lots of extra PC memory.

The science from their "X-ray Spectrometer(XRS)" and "Gamma Ray
Spectrometer(GRS)" as likely being equally saturated at much greater
levels than expected, as such may also have to become excluded from
the general public, because of such data being so unexpectedly intense
or off-scale, in that an entirely new effort at obtaining such
intended science about the complex surface of our physically dark moon
may have to wait for the next available mission. Perhaps the lunar
exploration efforts by India will have adapted the necessary narrow
bandpass of sufficient optical spectrum filtering with sufficient
color correction, as well as for their science instruments having
either greater XRS/GRS scope or much tighter resolution in order to
properly deal with the unusual gamma and X-ray intensity of what that
naked and very anticathode moon actually represents.

KAGUYA/(SELENE) HDTV/CCD imaging getting its first full solar dosage
or skewed saturation of those pesky raw secondary photons, as for
looking rather deep blue.http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2007/10/200...ya.jaxa.jp/en/
Notice as to all of those unavoidable UV secondary/recoil worth of
that bluish and/or extra purple/violet saturation that KAGUYA/(SELENE)
HDTV is having to deal with, even though their having incorporated a
sufficient UV spectrum cut-off filter and currently using not more
than a few percent worth of their HDTV dynamic range(DR), even so
having no problems with recording the physically dark moon along with
Earth that's not even half the albedo worth of Venus which also has
greater than 2.6 kw/m2 to work with. Far better images are soon
enough going to be accomplished, especially with those other onboard
CCD instruments that'll far exceed what most previous science about
our extremely unusual moon.
- Brad Guth -

Come on folks, tell us why the NASA/Apollo moon was never the least
bit blue.

- Brad Guth

Perhaps everything of Japan and China that's getting such new and
improved science data about our unusually massive and nearby moon
that's looking so unusually blue, as such is having to be mainstream
taboo/nondisclosure rated for all it's worth, all because it's getting
too freaking honest and clearly not sufficiently Semitic enough to
suit those in charge of our private parts.

As having said this so often before; Our blue moon as having been
recently color CCD imaged with quality bandpass coated optics is in
fact looking rather secondary/recoil photon bluish, pretty much
exactly as it should appear to those insufficiently filtered cameras.
Of course our NASA/Apollo EVA cameras had no such narrow bandpass
coatings whatsoever, much less of having any color hue saturation
cutoff worth of optical element, but they did have all of that nifty
Kodak film that was more spectrum sensitive than the human eye.

BTW, our moon's albedo on average of 0.11 is nearly as physically dark
as an open pit coal mine. Go figure upon which other nearly white
guano island sort of moon as having been xenon arc lamp spectrum
illuminated that our rad-hard Apollo wizards landed upon, instead of
the physically dark and unavoidably reactive basalt naked surface of
such iron, cobalt, sodium and titanium worth of our crystal dry and
extremely dusty moon that's upon average physically darker than
basalt, and as such representing that unavoidably gamma and X-ray
anticathode nasty environment in addition to all of its naked basalt
and dusty surface as being so unavoidably electrostatic charged.

- Brad Guth

On Dec 21, 7:06 am, BradGuth wrote:
The Moon is not actually BLUE, except to the unfiltered eye. A good
orange/amber worth of optical filter, as added onto an otherwise
bandpass coated lens would have permitted a somewhat more natural
color looking moon, as though viewed from Earth using a good telescope
that's getting extensively filtered by our polluted atmosphere and
secondly by the rather extensive 8r worth of sodium atmosphere
associated with that moon.

However, it looks as though we're being lied to again and again. In
other words, it seems their MI5/CIA boss or MIB agent in charge of
damage control, that's likely standing directly behind each operator
of their spendy supercomputer work stations (with a loaded gun pointed
at each of their empty heads) is not about to allow any public Usenet
chat about our unusually blue moon, or much less about how their NASA
and of those rad-hard Apollo wizards, along with all that Semitic
Third Reich kind of right stuff as having so nicely managed to always
hide Venus.

JAXA / SELENE (KAGUYA)http://www.selene.jaxa.jp/en/communi...ion_e.htm#NEW_...

Notice their intentional color removal of the moon, and of those very
same images as otherwise depicting mother Earth in full color.

Notice down the page of those other full color images of just the moon
itself along with parts of the their spacecraft as depicted in such a
nifty bluish saturation hue. Remember that Selene's quality optics
had been bandpass coated in order to cut out the vast bulk of UV and
IR to start with.

The rather impressive blue saturated hue is clearly an expected color
shift or tint, that's due to all of the raw secondary/recoil of what
most reactive items getting UV saturated should look like to such a
bandpass filtered CCD or especially to that of an unfiltered Kodak
film recorded image.

Unfortunately, their "KAGUYA Image Gallery" that's apparently forever
stuck with using the "Adobe(R) Flash Player(R)" is what seriously
sucks, as sharing far less than full resolution and otherwise running
extremely poorly on most computers w/o a super fast internet
connection and lots of extra PC memory.

The science from their "X-ray Spectrometer(XRS)" and "Gamma Ray
Spectrometer(GRS)" being equally saturated at much greater levels than
expected, as such may also have to become excluded from the public,
because of such data being so unexpectedly intense or off-scale that
an entirely new effort at obtaining such intended science about the
complex surface of our physically dark moon may have to wait for the
next available mission. Perhaps the lunar exploration efforts by
India will have adapted the necessary narrow bandpass of sufficient
optical filtering, as well as for having greater XRS/GRS scope in
order to properly deal with the unusual gamma and X-ray intensity of
what that naked and very anticathode moon actually represents.

KAGUYA/(SELENE) HDTV/CCD imaging getting its first full solar dosage
or skewed saturation of those pesky raw secondary photons, as for
looking rather deep blue.http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2007/10/200...ya.jaxa.jp/en/
Notice as to all of those unavoidable UV secondary/recoil worth of
that bluish and/or extra purple/violet saturation that KAGUYA/(SELENE)
HDTV is having to deal with, even though their having incorproated a
sufficient UV spectrum cut-off filter and currently using not more
than a few percent worth of their HDTV dynamic range(DR), even so
having no problems with recording the physically dark moon along with
Earth that's not even half the albedo worth of Vemus which also has
greater than 2.6 kw/m2 to work with. Far better images are soon
enough going to be accomplished, especially with those other onboard
CCD instruments that'll far exceed what most previous science about
our extremely unusual moon.
- Brad Guth -





BradGuth wrote:
That moon of ours is not actually blue, except to the unfiltered
camera eye.

In addition to our physically dark, dusty and electrostatic charged
moon that's more than gamma saturated, as well as having to look as
though rather bluish to the naked/unfiltered Kodak eye, and especially
to the greater DR(dynamic range) of an unfiltered CCD eye, it's thin
atmosphere is also more than a wee bit hot and salty.

The Moon's Sodium Tail and the Leonid Meteor Shower http://sirius.bu.edu/moontail/

It seems that camera optics intended for depicting that close-up look-
see at our naked moon as to what the human eye would perceive once
outside of our polluted atmosphere, as such requires a quality applied
layer of a bandpass coating (as done for the JAXA/Selene mission) in
addition to such optics having a sufficient spectrum cutoff filter of
deep yellow or amber/orange (of which JAXA/Selene clearly did not
have) that'll greatly attenuate the unavoidable UV/black-light
generated affect of our unusually massive and nearby moon otherwise
appearing as though looking so gosh darn bluish if not somewhat deep
purple as recorded by way of the ongoing China/Chang'e mission.

As well, it seems those S8/sulphur acidic saturated clouds of Venus
that are rather reflective as well as unavoidably reactive to the raw
UV worth of cosmic and solar illumination, to the point of also
looking by way of the unfiltered camera eye as being somewhat of a
vibrant purple/violet spectrum, that's nicely reflecting roughly 80%
of the 2600+ w/m2 rather effectively, thus making Venus seem
unavoidably for its relative size as somewhat brighter looking than
Earth, is still an odd one in that our NASA/Apollo teams have simply
never once managed to get any part of that bright little orb within
any given FOV(field of view), as for otherwise being unavoidably right
there to behold from the standpoint of a given EVA or especially
unavoidably obvious from lunar orbit, as being clearly situated above
that physically dark lunar horizon and otherwise situated at times
within the very same FOV as though parked or rather passing near our
polluted and somewhat albedo dim Earth.

Most any real or computer simulated interactive 3D solar system
simulator more than proves as to exactly where the planet Venus was at
any given time, such as to each those Apollo missions of A-11, A-14
and A-16, yet all the very best of NASA's all-knowing wizards within
their uplink.space.com and/or of most any other internet science
forum, or even within the vast borg like community of Usenet can't
seem to manage to share any such 3D interactive orbital perspective,
even though they have always had access to the newest and best of our
public supercomputers along with all the very best of fully
interactive 3D simulation software that'll knock our virtual animation
socks off. Go figure.
- Brad Guth

Odd, there's not so much as one physics or scientific word of wisdom
coming from the likes of NASA's uplink.space.com or from their Third
Reich brown-nosed minions of those all-knowing Usenet Semitic kind, as
for sharing anything about our physically dark and blue moon as
clearly redocumented by way of what Japan and China have recently
accomplished independently of one another.

I know, it must be the fault of all those physics and science smart
Muslims, as always trying to trick us once again and again, just like
they did with having so well hidden all of those WMD and having before
accomplished so much on behalf of their backing Hitler (oops! wrong
global domination faith-based group).

- Brad Guth

On Dec 7 2007, 11:35 am, BradGuth wrote:
Why does our moon image via Japan and China as though so unusually
deep blue color saturated, as having been accomplished with some of
the very best CCD cameras outfitted with the finest of optics and
sharp cutoff of bandpass filtering for entirely excluding those UV-a
and IR spectrums, and even to some extent moderating the violet hue
worth of raw solar illumination?
- Brad Guth

BTW, why exactly is our resident spook/mole "MI5 Persecution" getting
so gosh darn upset postal (aka, bent out of shape) about the sorts of
good folks sharing the whole truth and nothing but the truth?

- Brad Guth

On Jan 1, 3:51*pm, BradGuth wrote:
On Dec 7 2007, 11:35 am, BradGuth wrote:

Why does our moon image via Japan and China as though *so unusually
deep blue color saturated, as having been accomplished with some of
the very best CCD cameras outfitted with the finest of optics and
sharp cutoff of bandpass filtering for entirely excluding those UV-a
and IR spectrums, and even to some extent moderating the violet hue
worth of raw solar illumination?
- Brad Guth

BTW, why exactly is our resident spook/mole "MI5 Persecution" getting
so gosh darn upset postal (aka, bent out of shape) about the sorts of
good folks sharing the whole truth and nothing but the truth?

Maybe he is the only person that is nuttier than you here?


- Brad Guth

On Jan 2, 11:58 am, Eric Chomko wrote:
On Jan 1, 3:51 pm, BradGuth wrote:

On Dec 7 2007, 11:35 am, BradGuth wrote:

Why does our moon image via Japan and China as though so unusually
deep blue color saturated, as having been accomplished with some of
the very best CCD cameras outfitted with the finest of optics and
sharp cutoff of bandpass filtering for entirely excluding those UV-a
and IR spectrums, and even to some extent moderating the violet hue
worth of raw solar illumination?
- Brad Guth

BTW, why exactly is our resident spook/mole "MI5 Persecution" getting
so gosh darn upset postal (aka, bent out of shape) about the sorts of
good folks sharing the whole truth and nothing but the truth?

Maybe he is the only person that is nuttier than you here?

Why is the moon as imaged by Japan and China looking so blue, while
our NASA/Apollo images via their unfiltered Kodak moments was never
depicted as the least bit blue?
- Brad Guth

In article
,
Eric Chomko wrote:

snip

BTW, why exactly is our resident spook/mole "MI5 Persecution" getting
so gosh darn upset postal (aka, bent out of shape) about the sorts of
good folks sharing the whole truth and nothing but the truth?

Maybe he is the only person that is nuttier than you here?

Cue D.J. Min ...

--
Odysseus

On Jan 3, 12:54 am, Odysseus wrote:
In article
,
Eric Chomko wrote:

snip

BTW, why exactly is our resident spook/mole "MI5 Persecution" getting
so gosh darn upset postal (aka, bent out of shape) about the sorts of
good folks sharing the whole truth and nothing but the truth?

Maybe he is the only person that is nuttier than you here?

Cue D.J. Min ...

--
Odysseus

As per usual, silly folks of Usenet ****ology doing their mainstream
butt-sucking status quo or bust thing, just like in those good old
Roman partnership days of Yiddish puppeteers putting their own kind on
a stick for another one of those faith-based PR stunts.

off-topic: What do you think about other life existing/coexisting on
Venus?

- Brad Guth

On Jan 3, 8:19*am, BradGuth wrote:
On Jan 3, 12:54 am, Odysseus wrote:





In article
,
*Eric Chomko wrote:

snip

BTW, why exactly is our resident spook/mole "MI5 Persecution" getting
so gosh darn upset postal (aka, bent out of shape) about the sorts of
good folks sharing the whole truth and nothing but the truth?

Maybe he is the only person that is nuttier than you here?

Cue D.J. Min ...



off-topic: *What do you think about other life existing/coexisting on
Venus?

- Brad Guth- Hide quoted text -


When every probe, including those dropped down into the atmosphere,
and all other studies agree that Venus' temperature is far, far too
high for any sort of life form, even extremeophile bacteria that can
live at over 100C, there's no point in even asking the question. A
highly advanced civilization might be able to build enclosed outposts
that could support life, but why the heck would they, and where would
they have come from given that the chemisty of life could not have
evolved on a planet with those temps and no possibility of liquid
water? Far, far more likely is that any claims of artifical
structures of Venus are misinterpretations of physical features. You
can get the same results looking at similar-resolution images of any
planet with a solid surface, or TItan for that matter.

On Jan 3, 3:54*am, Odysseus wrote:
In article
,
*Eric Chomko wrote:

snip



BTW, why exactly is our resident spook/mole "MI5 Persecution" getting
so gosh darn upset postal (aka, bent out of shape) about the sorts of
good folks sharing the whole truth and nothing but the truth?

Maybe he is the only person that is nuttier than you here?

Cue D.J. Min ...

And the Twlight Zone music as well...


--
Odysseus