The hot rocks of Venus, looking intelligent

On Oct 10, 7:37 am, BradGuth wrote:
It's as though we're not being told the whole truth and nothing but
the truth about much of anything these days. Talk about revising
history, science and a whole lot more, whereas those hot rocks of
Venus that so happen to look so unusually intelligent are most likely
still there to behold.

This observationology of image interpretation isn't even the least bit
phony, or is it having any ulterior motives or hidden agenda like our
mutually perpetrated cold-war(s), or even hot-war(s) over energy as of
lately, and there's nothing but an all around win-win for science and
humanity if in fact any of those hot rocks are actually those modified
and/or put to good use by intelligent other life. At least there's
nothing about Venus that's technically all that insurmountable, that
is unless you're not quite half as smart as a hot rock.

The official NASA/Magellan image being that of a 36 look per pixel
format or composite of pixels having been given essentially the
benefit of 36 confirming looks each, is by itself worthy of looking at
for all kinds of honest reasons besides those of whatever's so
intelligent/artificial, as opposed to the perfectly natural looking
items that are of equally impressive planetology.

Does anyone in GOOGLE/NOVA usenet land care to discuss/review the long
list of what-ifs?
- Brad Guth -

Of all the living creatures I've known on the planet Venus, the
Garuda bird
is the most terrifying of them all/

- Tom

On Oct 16, 10:10 pm, Saint Isadore Patron Saint of the Internet
wrote:

Of all the living creatures I've known on the planet Venus, the
Garuda bird is the most terrifying of them all/

The "Garuda bird" sounds perfectly terrifying. Any good specs on that
bird?
- Brad Guth -

On Oct 10, 7:37 am, BradGuth wrote:
It's as though we're not being told the whole truth and nothing but
the truth about much of anything these days. Talk about revising
history, science and a whole lot more, whereas those hot rocks of
Venus that so happen to look so unusually intelligent are most likely
still there to behold.

This observationology of image interpretation isn't even the least bit
phony, or is it having any ulterior motives or hidden agenda like our
mutually perpetrated cold-war(s), or even hot-war(s) over energy as of
lately, and there's nothing but an all around win-win for science and
humanity if in fact any of those hot rocks are actually those modified
and/or put to good use by intelligent other life. At least there's
nothing about Venus that's technically all that insurmountable, that
is unless you're not quite half as smart as a hot rock.

The official NASA/Magellan image being that of a 36 look per pixel
format or composite of pixels having been given essentially the
benefit of 36 confirming looks each, is by itself worthy of looking at
for all kinds of honest reasons besides those of whatever's so
intelligent/artificial, as opposed to the perfectly natural looking
items that are of equally impressive planetology.

Does anyone in GOOGLE/NOVA usenet land care to discuss/review the long
list of what-ifs?
- Brad Guth -

Notice how all the semitic Third Reich clowns are coming out to vote,
changing usenet on the fly sort of speak, as well as having been
sharing as much of their Google/NOVA spermware/****ware as they can
muster. My poor old PC is chuck full of all the proof that anyone
ever needs to see, as to how such Zion Yids (aka pretend atheists) are
still doing their usual faith-based damage control.

Oddly, they haven't shared an honest word on behalf of anything Venus.

Is there something about Venus we're not supposed to know about?
- Brad Guth -

On Oct 20, 11:52 pm, BradGuth wrote:
On Oct 10, 7:37 am, BradGuth wrote:





It's as though we're not being told the whole truth and nothing but
the truth about much of anything these days. Talk about revising
history, science and a whole lot more, whereas those hot rocks of
Venus that so happen to look so unusually intelligent are most likely
still there to behold.

This observationology of image interpretation isn't even the least bit
phony, or is it having any ulterior motives or hidden agenda like our
mutually perpetrated cold-war(s), or even hot-war(s) over energy as of
lately, and there's nothing but an all around win-win for science and
humanity if in fact any of those hot rocks are actually those modified
and/or put to good use by intelligent other life. At least there's
nothing about Venus that's technically all that insurmountable, that
is unless you're not quite half as smart as a hot rock.

The official NASA/Magellan image being that of a 36 look per pixel
format or composite of pixels having been given essentially the
benefit of 36 confirming looks each, is by itself worthy of looking at
for all kinds of honest reasons besides those of whatever's so
intelligent/artificial, as opposed to the perfectly natural looking
items that are of equally impressive planetology.

Does anyone in GOOGLE/NOVA usenet land care to discuss/review the long
list of what-ifs?
- Brad Guth -

Notice how all the semitic Third Reich clowns are coming out to vote,
changing usenet on the fly sort of speak, as well as having been
sharing as much of their Google/NOVA spermware/****ware as they can
muster. My poor old PC is chuck full of all the proof that anyone
ever needs to see, as to how such Zion Yids (aka pretend atheists) are
still doing their usual faith-based damage control.

Oddly, they haven't shared an honest word on behalf of anything Venus.

Is there something about Venus we're not supposed to know about?

BTW, as of lately in addition to my having to frequently reboot, as
well as usenet going down to its "An error was encountered while
trying to post, please try again later" knees, and/or entirely failing
to function shortly after I've posted a given reply, just further
wondering as to why am I nearly always gettting "?scoring=d&q=brad
+guth&hl=en" or similar GOOGLE/NOVA crapolla code like "?hl=en?
scoring=d&hl=en" robo tagged onto most every topic ID, so that I can't
directly sort by date. Is there anything other than something Yiddish
about this kind of usenet specific spermware/****ware that's usenet
server specific?

I'm also getting their official Google/NOVA usenet server code that's
imposed upon certain topics so that my topic rating votes are not
being taken into account, and folks that's also no freaking lie
because, I've got the proof of such semitic robo-monderation glaring
directly into my face.
- Brad Guth -

On Oct 10, 7:37 am, BradGuth wrote:
It's as though we're not being told the whole truth and nothing but
the truth about much of anything these days. Talk about revising
history, science and a whole lot more, whereas those hot rocks of
Venus that so happen to look so unusually intelligent are most likely
still there to behold.

This observationology of image interpretation isn't even the least bit
phony, or is it having any ulterior motives or hidden agenda like our
mutually perpetrated cold-war(s), or even hot-war(s) over energy as of
lately, and there's nothing but an all around win-win for science and
humanity if in fact any of those hot rocks are actually those modified
and/or put to good use by intelligent other life. At least there's
nothing about Venus that's technically all that insurmountable, that
is unless you're not quite half as smart as a hot rock.

The official NASA/Magellan image being that of a 36 look per pixel
format or composite of pixels having been given essentially the
benefit of 36 confirming looks each, is by itself worthy of looking at
for all kinds of honest reasons besides those of whatever's so
intelligent/artificial, as opposed to the perfectly natural looking
items that are of equally impressive planetology.

Does anyone in GOOGLE/NOVA usenet land care to discuss/review the long
list of what-ifs?
- Brad Guth -

Hot Rocks of Venus that are looking intelligent
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.s...ef6e303aa2c890
Not: http://groups.google.com/group/sci.s...68f3c59a60558b

Whenever sharing about our moon or Venus, it's exactly as though we're
not being told the whole truth and nothing but the truth about much of
anything these days. Talk about revising history, science and a whole
lot more, whereas those hot rocks of Venus that so happen to look as
though having been arranged so gosh darn unusually intelligent, are
most likely still there to behold, and we've had the technology for
having taken a much closer look-see for better than a good decade.

This observationology of image interpretation isn't the least bit
hocus-pocus phony, nor is it having any ulterior motives or hidden
agenda like our mutually perpetrated cold-war(s), or even hot-war(s)
over fossil and yellowcake energy as of lately, and there's nothing
but an all around win-win for science and humanity if in fact any of
those hot rocks of Venus are actually of those modified and/or having
been put to good use by intelligent other life. At least there's
nothing about Venus that's technically all that insurmountable, that
is unless you're not quite half as smart as a hot rock.

The official NASA/Magellan image of GIF format, as being that of a 36
look per pixel composite as having been given essentially the benefit
of those 36 confirming radar looks per each pixel, is by itself worthy
of our consideration for all kinds of honest reasons besides those
patterns of whatever's interpreting as so AI /(intelligent/
artificial), as opposed to all of the perfectly natural appearing
items that are of equally outstanding planetology, such as the
impressive FLUID ARCH.

The big question of the day is; Does anyone within Google/NOVA's
usenetland of such all-knowing wizards care to discuss/review the long
and growing list of what-ifs? (after all, for all we know those hot-
foot Venusians could even be of a Zion/semitic faith)

For a topic starter, we are obviously not talking about any cool and
wet Earth like environment, or even that of our weird, naked and
somewhat salty moon, nor of any such dead and nearly frozen to the
core likes of Mars or of whatever's so much further away. At times
Venus is actually extremely nearby (a little over 100X the distance of
our moon), and it's absolutely chuck full of its very own geothermal
cache of raw energy that's sharing a surface of 20.5 w/m2 (roughly 256
fold greater than Earth), that which only a born-again dork of a
naysayer like most of our usenet anti-think-tank rusemasters couldn't
possibly appreciate.

Why exclude the unknown simply because it's unknown? In other words,
most likely your whole intellectual mindset worth of whatever's
supposedly wiser and thus greater than most, that's simply faiyjh-
based obligated on behalf of what has to go out of its infomercial
spewing way in order to exclude upon any such off-world intelligent
other life, regardless of whatever's the applied technology, or even
to banish anything that's of off-world intelligent potential
regardless of whatever's the alternative planetology and of its local
evolution, of which you and I know absolutely nothing about is what
seems a bit counter-productive.

If at all possible, please do further explain as to those very
intelligent and/or rational community looking items, as if somehow
those were being purely natural, by way of offering us some other
image examples, as to sharing in where such a rational complex
community looking group of planetology considerations are otherwise to
be found within common/terrestrial planetology w/o AI benefit of
whatever intelligent life accomplished, such as right here on Earth
should offer. For one basic observationology argument example; How
many complex looking tarmacs are there on Earth that had absolutely
nothing whatsoever of AI to do with their having been created or
otherwise crafted/modified for their rational use by intelligent life?

Thanks once again to our once upon a time "tomcat", for once having
posted a link to this updated page of Venus images.
http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/th...humbnails.html

Some of the most interesting AI information can be found within image
No.17 from the top left, as being the 225 m/pixel composite frame of
such radar obtained pixels that so happens to include the robust,
rather sizable and somewhat complex community of 'GUTH Venus', of
which you should apply your own PhotoShop/resampling enlargement of at
least 3X, along with whatever unsharp mask filter plus other image
cleaning or treatment options you'd care to apply. Remember that a
purely negative or naysay mindset of a true rusemaster simply can't
accomplish such PhotoShop enlargements without making the image look
worse off than it really is.
"Lava channels, Lo Shen Valles, Venus from Magellan Cycle 1"
http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/ht...115s095_1.html
http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/hi...c115s095_1.gif

If you still can not find this community of interesting pixels, then
you are not nearly as good at observationology as you think you are.
- Brad Guth -

Hang in there Brad it's just a progressive and unconstitutional
morphing
of the Usenet. We Patron Saints are holding it all together. As to
that
link to the GUTH Venus that ain't the Garuda bird. I have a picture
of it
on my website (can't recall just where) but, if you care to browse it
in
the graphics area I'm sure you will find it.

www.apple2.org.za/gswv/me/

Ding, dong, doodle --- If at first you don't succeed try again.
Help I'm stuck in Windowz and I'm melting.

On Oct 27, 11:37 pm, Saint Isadore Patron Saint of the Internet
wrote:
Hang in there Brad it's just a progressive and unconstitutional
morphing
of the Usenet. We Patron Saints are holding it all together. As to
that
link to the GUTH Venus that ain't the Garuda bird.

That's true. Too bad so many decades are getting wasted and at such
cost of collateral damage and the carnage of innocent folks, instead
of advancing upon what's clearly doable and would directly benefit our
environment, our minds and our quality of life, including the sharing
of such knowledge about Venus as having that other intelligent life,
of which we should imbrace instead of fear and/or banish.
- Brad Guth -

BradGuth wrote:
Whenever sharing science and honest notions about our moon or
Venus, it's almost exactly as though we're not being told the
whole truth and nothing but the truth about much of anything these
days. Talk about revising history, science and a whole lot more,
whereas those hot rocks of Venus that just so happen to look as
though having been arranged so gosh darn unusually intelligent, are
most likely still there to behold, and we've had the technology for
having taken a much closer look-see for better than a decade.

This observationology of image interpretation isn't the least bit
hocus-pocus phony, nor is it having any ulterior motives or hidden
agenda like our mutually perpetrated cold-war(s), or even hot-war(s)
over fossil and yellowcake energy as of lately, and there's nothing
but an all around win-win for science and humanity if in fact any
of those hot rocks of Venus are actually of those modified and/or
having been put into good use by intelligent other life. At least
there's nothing about surviving Venus that's technically all that
insurmountable, that is unless you're not quite half as smart as a
hot rock.

The official NASA/Magellan image of a GIF format, as being that which
offers a 36 look per pixel composite as having been given essentially
the benefit of those 36 confirming radar looks per each pixel, is by
itself worthy of getting our consideration for all kinds of honest
reasons besides those extremely interesting patterns of whatever's
interpreting as so AI/(intelligent/artificial), as opposed to all of
the perfectly natural appearing items that are of equally outstanding
planetology, such as their absolutely impressive FLUID ARCH.

The bigger question of the day is; Does anyone within Google/NOVA's
usenetland of such all-knowing wizards care to discuss/review the long
and growing list of what-ifs? (after all, for all we know those hot-
foot Venusians could even be of a Zion/semitic faith)

For a topic starter, we are obviously not talking about any such cool
and wet Earth like polluted environment, or even as to that of our
local naked orbiting mascon and somewhat salty moon, nor of any such
planetology that's dead and nearly frozen to the core likes of Mars,
or of whatever's so much further away. At times Venus is actually
crusing extremely nearby (a little over 100X the distance of our moon),
and it's absolutely chuck full of its very own geothermal cache of raw
energy that's sharing a surface of 20.5 w/m2 (roughly 256 fold greater
than Earth), that which only a born-again dork of a naysayer like most
of our usenet anti-think-tank rusemasters couldn't possibly appreciate.

Why exclude the unknown simply because it's unknown? In other words,
most likely your whole intellectual mindset worth of whatever's
supposedly so much wiser and thus greater than what most of us can
muster, that's simply faith-based obligated on behalf of what has to
go out of its infomercial spewing way in order to exclude upon any
such off-world intelligent other life, regardless of whatever's the
applied technology, or even to banish anything that's of off-world
intelligent potential regardless of whatever's the viable alternative
planetology and of its local evolution, of which yourself, others and
even I know absolutely nothing objective about, is what seems a bit
anti-research or just downright counter-productive.

If at all possible, please do further share your review as to those
very intelligent and/or rational community looking items, as if
somehow those were being purely natural, by way of offering us some
other image examples, as to sharing in where such a rational complex
community looking group of planetology considerations are otherwise
to be found within common/terrestrial planetology w/o AI benefit of
whatever intelligent life accomplished, such as right here on Earth
should offer. For one basic observationology argument example; How
many complex looking tarmacs are there on Earth that had absolutely
nothing whatsoever of AI to do with their having been created or
otherwise crafted/modified for their rational use by intelligent life?

Thanks once again to our once upon a time "tomcat", for his once
having posted a link to this updated page of Venus images.
http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/th...humbnails.html

Some of the most interesting AI worthy information can be found
within image No.17 from the top left, as being the 225 m/pixel
composite frame of such radar obtained pixels that so happens to
include the robust, rather sizable and somewhat complex community
of 'GUTH Venus', of which you should apply your very own PhotoShop/
resampling enlargement of at least 3X, along with whatever unsharp
mask filter plus other image cleaning or worthy treatment options
you'd care to apply. Remember that a purely negative or naysay
mindset of a true rusemaster simply can't accomplish such PhotoShop
enlargements without knowingly making the image look worse off than
it really is.
"Lava channels, Lo Shen Valles,Venusfrom Magellan Cycle 1"
http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/ht...115s095_1.html
http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/hi...c115s095_1.gif

If you still can not find this community of interesting pixels, then
you are not nearly as good at observationology as you think you are.
- Brad Guth -


Ever take notice how the usenet borg collective backs itself way the
hell off from a given topic, such as whenever we catch them red-handed
and/or brown-=nosed with their phony (pretend atheist) faith-based
pants all the way down?

Apparently their Yiddish nose browning is priority No.1 in usenet
naysayville, and secondly is their infowar/infomercial spewing
regardless of the consequences and without a speck of remorse for
whatever's the collateral damage or carnage of the innocent, and
typically these very same folks never give a tinkers damn as to how
bloody or spendy energy gets. (go figure otherwise)

Meanwhile, we have an extremely interesting and most likely
intelligent and rational looking items of whatever's existing/
coexisting on Venus, that has been recorded by way of radar imaging
and as such is about as good and trustworthy of what such image pixels
can offer, yet it's still being treated as taboo/nondisclosure rated,
as is the ESA Venus Express PFS data being kept in stealth (aka need-
to-know) status.

BTW, the ongoing rusemaster expertise of usenet robo word tagging with
whatever's before of after a given key word or link isn't going
unnoticed, or under appreciated by those few of us attempting to share
the whole truth and nothing but the truth, as always based upon the
regular laws of physics and otherwise supported from the best
available science that's independently replicated via peers of the
honest kind.
- Brad Guth -

Why exactly is our resident spook/mole "MI5 Persecution" getting so
gosh darn upset, as in going Usenet robo-posting postal (aka, bent out
of shape) about the sorts of good and decent folks sharing perfectly
honest ideas along with the best available whole truth and nothing but
the truth?

- Brad Guth


On Nov 6 2007, 10:46 am, BradGuth wrote:
BradGuth wrote:
Whenever sharing science and honest notions about our moon or
Venus, it's almost exactly as though we're not being told the
whole truth and nothing but the truth about much of anything these
days. Talk about revising history, science and a whole lot more,
whereas thosehotrocksofVenusthat just so happen to look as
though having been arranged so gosh darn unusually intelligent, are
most likely still there to behold, and we've had the technology for
having taken a much closer look-see for better than a decade.

This observationology of image interpretation isn't the least bit
hocus-pocus phony, nor is it having any ulterior motives or hidden
agenda like our mutually perpetrated cold-war(s), or evenhot-war(s)
over fossil and yellowcake energy as of lately, and there's nothing
but an all around win-win for science and humanity if in fact any
of thosehotrocksofVenusare actually of those modified and/or
having been put into good use by intelligent other life. At least
there's nothing about survivingVenusthat's technically all that
insurmountable, that is unless you're not quite half as smart as a
hotrock.

The official NASA/Magellan image of a GIF format, as being that which
offers a 36 look per pixel composite as having been given essentially
the benefit of those 36 confirming radar looks per each pixel, is by
itself worthy of getting our consideration for all kinds of honest
reasons besides those extremely interesting patterns of whatever's
interpreting as so AI/(intelligent/artificial), as opposed to all of
the perfectly natural appearing items that are of equally outstanding
planetology, such as their absolutely impressive FLUID ARCH.

The bigger question of the day is; Does anyone within Google/NOVA's
usenetland of such all-knowing wizards care to discuss/review the long
and growing list of what-ifs? (after all, for all we know thosehot-
foot Venusians could even be of a Zion/semitic faith)

For a topic starter, we are obviously not talking about any such cool
and wet Earth like polluted environment, or even as to that of our
local naked orbiting mascon and somewhat salty moon, nor of any such
planetology that's dead and nearly frozen to the core likes of Mars,
or of whatever's so much further away. At timesVenusis actually
crusing extremely nearby (a little over 100X the distance of our moon),
and it's absolutely chuck full of its very own geothermal cache of raw
energy that's sharing a surface of 20.5 w/m2 (roughly 256 fold greater
than Earth), that which only a born-again dork of a naysayer like most
of our usenet anti-think-tank rusemasters couldn't possibly appreciate.

Why exclude the unknown simply because it's unknown? In other words,
most likely your whole intellectual mindset worth of whatever's
supposedly so much wiser and thus greater than what most of us can
muster, that's simply faith-based obligated on behalf of what has to
go out of its infomercial spewing way in order to exclude upon any
such off-world intelligent other life, regardless of whatever's the
applied technology, or even to banish anything that's of off-world
intelligent potential regardless of whatever's the viable alternative
planetology and of its local evolution, of which yourself, others and
even I know absolutely nothing objective about, is what seems a bit
anti-research or just downright counter-productive.

If at all possible, please do further share your review as to those
very intelligent and/or rational community looking items, as if
somehow those were being purely natural, by way of offering us some
other image examples, as to sharing in where such a rational complex
community looking group of planetology considerations are otherwise
to be found within common/terrestrial planetology w/o AI benefit of
whatever intelligent life accomplished, such as right here on Earth
should offer. For one basic observationology argument example; How
many complex looking tarmacs are there on Earth that had absolutely
nothing whatsoever of AI to do with their having been created or
otherwise crafted/modified for their rational use by intelligent life?

Thanks once again to our once upon a time "tomcat", for his once
having posted a link to this updated page ofVenusimages.
http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/th...humbnails.html

Some of the most interesting AI worthy information can be found
within image No.17 from the top left, as being the 225 m/pixel
composite frame of such radar obtained pixels that so happens to
include the robust, rather sizable and somewhat complex community
of 'GUTHVenus', of which you should apply your very own PhotoShop/
resampling enlargement of at least 3X, along with whatever unsharp
mask filter plus other image cleaning or worthy treatment options
you'd care to apply. Remember that a purely negative or naysay
mindset of a true rusemaster simply can't accomplish such PhotoShop
enlargements without knowingly making the image look worse off than
it really is.
"Lava channels, Lo Shen Valles,Venusfrom Magellan Cycle 1"
http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/ht...115s095_1.html
http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/hi...c115s095_1.gif

If you still can not find this community of interesting pixels, then
you are not nearly as good at observationology as you think you are.
- Brad Guth -

Ever take notice how the usenet borg collective backs itself way the
hell off from a given topic, such as whenever we catch them red-handed
and/or brown-=nosed with their phony (pretend atheist) faith-based
pants all the way down?

Apparently their Yiddish nose browning is priority No.1 in usenet
naysayville, and secondly is their infowar/infomercial spewing
regardless of the consequences and without a speck of remorse for
whatever's the collateral damage or carnage of the innocent, and
typically these very same folks never give a tinkers damn as to how
bloody or spendy energy gets. (go figure otherwise)

Meanwhile, we have an extremely interesting and most likely
intelligent and rational looking items of whatever's existing/
coexisting onVenus, that has been recorded by way of radar imaging
and as such is about as good and trustworthy of what such image pixels
can offer, yet it's still being treated as taboo/nondisclosure rated,
as is the ESAVenusExpress PFS data being kept in stealth (aka need-
to-know) status.

BTW, the ongoing rusemaster expertise of usenet robo word tagging with
whatever's before of after a given key word or link isn't going
unnoticed, or under appreciated by those few of us attempting to share
the whole truth and nothing but the truth, as always based upon the
regular laws of physics and otherwise supported from the best
available science that's independently replicated via peers of the
honest kind.
- Brad Guth -

Why doesn't the toasty environment of Venus have more than its fair
share of local/renewable energy?

It seems only entirely logical that the local energy that's mostly
geothermal of Venus is nearly unlimited, and as such what can't be
accomplished (with or w/o The Ove Glove)?

- Brad Guth