![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Greg D. Moore (Strider) wrote: Oh I don't know. When one day he's claiming executive privilege and the next he's claiming the VP's office isn't part of the executive branch, does make you wonder. (I note since the threat of defunding his office was made he hasn't really tried to force that particular claim. :-) Hasn't produced a list of those classified documents yet either. I'm still snickering about Alberto Gonzales' sworn testimony, which held up for around...what was it? 24 hours this time? Next time around, I imagine it will collapse right while he's being questioned: "Mr. Attorney General, what is the weather at the moment?" "Clear blue skies." "Then why are you carrying a umbrella?" "Because it's raining." "The sky is blue, and yet it's raining?" "Yes." "How can that be?" "I don't know." "Did someone tell you it was clear today instead of raining?" "I can't say." "Did you talk to anyone about the weather today?" "If I did, it certainly wasn't about whether it was raining." "What did you talk about in regards to the weather then?" "Something else, but not rain." "What exactly?" "Something classified." :-P Pat |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Could someone who knows about ITAR give us a quick tutorial on what the enforcement procedures are? Assuming (which I think unlikely given that this has now gotten out into the public realm) the guy who called Scott decides to report a possible violation back to the State Department, probably through NASA channels, what happens next? Obviously State has to decide whether the report has merit -- but if they do, can they levy fines, send in SWAT teams etc. on their own or do they have to persuade DHS or DOJ to actually apply the muscle? This assumes, of course, that the preferred extralegal methods (threats to employment and livelihood, typically) are not available and that some sort of legal route would have to be used. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Scott Ferrin wrote: Uh yeah. Which is why I was able to download a 330 page writeup on Peacekeeper complete with drawings of many deployment schemes studied, another one on HiBEX and LoADS (ABM systems) and so forth. All from the Defense Technical Information Center. So where's the rational of hounding someone about having civilian stuff out there for download when all the while you (the government that is) have all this MILITARY stuff out there for the taking? I guess if you wanted to build a F-1 engined super ICBM... It never occurred to me before, but I wonder if this is why Rusty Barton's ballistic missile websites vanished from the web? Pat |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 28, 1:49 pm, Scott Lowther
wrote: Heh. Given that the document/drawing biz, along with eAPR and my model biz, *are* my sole sources of income.... they would either have an incredibly easy time of damaging my employment, or incredibly hard. They could try to talk my boss into bitchslapping me, but since I *am* my boss.... I've watched things like this for some while, and I think that things outside the traditional coercible employer/employee paradigm are kind of head-exploding for people in authoritarian positions. And I doubt that a State Dept. or DoJ lawyer would come close to pursuing your case if it got that far -- which it likely won't. But please do keep us informed if anything further comes of this. |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote: Assuming (which I think unlikely given that this has now gotten out into the public realm) the guy who called Scott decides to report a possible violation back to the State Department, probably through NASA channels, what happens next? http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/english...4965357213.jpg Pat :-) |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Why support Scott Loather when you can get the same info from Mark
Wade's site, plus in the book about the Saturn 5, the Saturn 5's payload guide is right there in black and white. Plus go to the library and scour back issues of AWST between 1965 qnd 1966 Pat |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Pat Flannery wrote:
: : :Rand Simberg wrote: : On Sat, 28 Jul 200 : : :Most of this seems to emanate from : :Cheney's office, who I am becoming increasingly convinced is clinically : :mentally unbalanced. : : : : Any evidence for any part of that last claim? Or is it just your own : mental imbalance from your own ideological hatreds? : : : Got it in one. : : : snip : I'll just note that your raving and the two cites you give don't seem much connected. :I don't know exactly what the founding fathers had in mind for the ![]() ![]() :scheming Grand Vizier who is always trying to thwart the constantly :evolving possible plans of Ali Baba to raise evil Djinn and overthrow :the kingdom while the dim-witted Sultan wanders around the throne room :and drools, it probably wasn't. : It only exists so that paranoid ideological haters like you have something else to be delusional about. -- "Ordinarily he is insane. But he has lucid moments when he is only stupid." -- Heinrich Heine |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Yay. In trouble with ITAR... | Scott Lowther | Policy | 97 | August 15th 07 07:12 PM |
ITAR - opensource GPS. | Ian Stirling | Policy | 0 | February 2nd 07 04:01 PM |
STS-121 Launch trouble | Malcolm Bacchus | Space Shuttle | 0 | July 4th 06 12:24 AM |
Trouble of O | Twittering One | Misc | 6 | December 12th 04 03:48 PM |
Web Trouble | Starlord | Amateur Astronomy | 13 | September 27th 03 07:51 PM |