Less Apollo 11, more Thunderbird 11. Wires prove the Apollo moon landings were filmed on a set.

On Nov 12, 7:34 am, (Rand Simberg)
wrote:
On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 07:15:07 -0800, in a place far, far away,
made the phosphor on my monitor glow in such a way
as to indicate that:





What do you expect from an idiot who believes there is intelligent
life on Venus and a sodium rich atmosphere on the moon?

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

Is incest actually that common in your family tree?

What is it about ETs that you and others of your incest kind so hate?

What is it about observationology that's so over your bigoted head?

You folks can't even run off a public owned 3D interactive orbital
simulator without ****ting another brick. In other words, besides
your killings of innocent Muslims that just so happen to have oil,
what is your infowar problem?
--
Brad Guth- Dölj citerad text -

- Visa citerad text -

Is this a bot?

Many have speculated that Brad is a tragically failed AI project.

Since when has our government and of its brown-nosed minions (such as
yourselves) not failed at such complex matters?

How the hell do you think those Zion semites created their puppet
Hitler, and of his many replacements?

It takes a Zion village in order to create those absolute monster
puppets, don't you think, and if that doesn't work there always a Pope
that'll go absolutely postal over the likes of Kathars/Cathars.

What is it about your bloody and spendy faith-based government ruse/
sting of the century that's a good thing?
--
Brad Guth

On Oct 8, 10:14 am, wrote:
See the effect of wires simulating 1/6th gravity.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wdMvQTNLaUE

Japan First Back To The Moon! / kT
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.s...8a85929879b6a0

http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2007/11/20071113_kaguya_e.html

That's absolutely right, however China is not exactly sitting on their
extremely wise old butts, are they.

BTW, notice how extremely dark and otherwise somewhat average coal
like 0.11 or actually of a slightly sooty darker kind of soft albedo,
that which our extremely dusty old and electrostatic charged moon
really is, as having been so clearly JAXA/HVTV imaged within the very
same FOV, as well as having been illuminated by the very same raw
solar spectrum that's unavoidably skewed by the excess amount of those
violet and UV photons.

Do we see anything of that naked lunar terrain that's looking the
least bit NASA/Apollo 0.65~0.075 albedo worthy, like a certain guano
island as modified to suit? (silly question, as I didn't think so)

Now imagine how much brighter than Earth the little violet color
skewed pixel worth of Venus is going to look. Actually the likes of
Mars, Jupiter and Saturn should also become part of those future JAXA/
KAGUYA(SELENE) obtained images, along with a few of those most bright
of stars unless having been intentionally spectrum filtered out or
PhotoShop removed.
--
Brad Guth

BradGuth wrote:
On Nov 12, 6:45 am, "Dean A. Markley" wrote:
BradGuth wrote:
On Nov 10, 11:14 pm, Hobo wrote:
Isolation, divorce, depression - the cost of Nasa's mission to reach
the Moon was borne heaviest by the wives of the astronauts. In their
struggle to cope they formed their own support network.
"Nasa wanted perfect wives, perfect children, perfect homes. There was
certainly some pressure there." Susan Borman, Apollo 8 wife.
So did Hitler and of those Zion puppeteers in charge of his private
parts.
It seems NASA got hold of some of the very best of Hitler's brains, in
the form of those semitic rocket and chemical/biological wizards that
made their previous boss so much better off. It seems that Zion Jews
also believe firmly in global domination, as well as in the continued
perfection of their genetic DNA code.
There is a strong basis of real physics and of replicated scientific
facts that questions our NASA/Apollo wizards, as supposedly having all
"the right stuff", as for their simply having NOT walked upon our
physically dark moon.
--
Brad Guth
Give it a rest already! Do you enjoy being proven wrong, repeatedly?

Speaking for yourself and fellow brown-nosed minions of your semitic
Third Reich?

What is it about the regular laws of physics and the best available
science that's independently replicated, that's "proven wrong"?

How the heck did you spooks/moles and borg like cult of Hitler's all-
knowing rusemasters of such hocus-pocus puppeteering manage to hide
Venus?

Are you saying that our moon isn't physically dark, isn't the least
bit salty, isn't anticathode reactive and thus isn't the least bit
unfriendly to our frail DNA or unfiltered Kodak film?

Are you saying we have enough rocket for getting nearly 50 tonnes so
quickly into that 100 km circular orbit, even though being of nearly
30% inert GLOW to start off with?

Are you saying that we actually have a fully R&D prototype of proven
fly-by-rocket landers that can be demonstrated?
--
Brad Guth

Yes. The prosecution rests.

Dean A. Markley wrote:

Are you saying that we actually have a fully R&D prototype of proven
fly-by-rocket landers that can be demonstrated?
--
Brad Guth

Yes. The prosecution rests.

The defense wants to change its plea to "not guilty by reason of
insanity", your honor. :-)

Pat

"Bill Shatzer" wrote in message
. ..
Peter Webb wrote:

How do you explain the fact that you can't see Venus in daytime photos on
earth?

Why should daytime photos on the moon be any different?

Earth has an atmosphere.

The moon doesn't.

The sun is just as bright, though.

Hell, just wave a picture of Mars at Brad, he can't tell the difference.