FR vs. GR and a century of experiments

Phil Bouchard wrote:

PD wrote:


What's wrong with wormholes and parallel universes?


ROFLMAO

So you are saying you have no idea. More demonstration
of your inability to learn any science.

Phil Bouchard wrote:

doug wrote:


So you have no clue and are just basking in your ignorance. This is
why you are hopeless in science.


It's funnier leaving blunders in wonders.

Well, you have certainly made a lot of blunders for
us to laugh at. Even you cannot be serious about
FR. You cannot be that stupid.

doug wrote:

Sometimes it is hard to tell when phil is lying or just being
stupid.

So Doug finally admits being unable to get the right answers.

Phil Bouchard wrote:

doug wrote:


So you are saying you have no idea. More demonstration
of your inability to learn any science.


Doug comes to the rescue and is in an attempt to further freely
plagiarize proofs.

Sometimes it is hard to tell when phil is lying or just being
stupid.

Phil Bouchard wrote:
doug wrote:


Sometimes it is hard to tell when phil is lying or just being
stupid.


So Doug finally admits being unable to get the right answers.

When dealing with a deluded fool like you, you have no idea
what correct answers are. You did not answer as to whether
you are stupid enough to believe anything related to FR.

doug wrote:

[...]

You have no idea what science entails. You have demonstrated that.
You are also too lazy to do the work.

He's asking me to pay for sleeping in the GR classes. I can do that
without paying.

doug wrote:

When dealing with a deluded fool like you, you have no idea
what correct answers are. You did not answer as to whether
you are stupid enough to believe anything related to FR.

Then keep GR, its blunders and wonders. I don't prevent you at all.

In article v_czm.82841$la3.29718@attbi_s22,
Sam Wormley wrote:

Phil Bouchard wrote:
PD wrote:

What's wrong with wormholes and parallel universes?

ROFLMAO

Phil--Just what do YOU think is wrong with wormholes and
parallel universes? Can you articulate your objection?

It must be because the dreaded square roots use wormholes(*) to get from
their parallel universes into ours.



*) Square ones, of course.

--
Odysseus

"Odysseus" wrote in message
news
In article v_czm.82841$la3.29718@attbi_s22,
Sam Wormley wrote:

Phil Bouchard wrote:
PD wrote:

What's wrong with wormholes and parallel universes?

ROFLMAO

Phil--Just what do YOU think is wrong with wormholes and
parallel universes? Can you articulate your objection?

It must be because the dreaded square roots use wormholes(*) to get from
their parallel universes into ours.



*) Square ones, of course.

Of course... you can't put a square peg in a round wormhole.

On Oct 7, 3:27*am, "Autymn D. C." wrote:
On Oct 7, 12:17*am, Phil Bouchard wrote:

Autymn D. C. wrote:
There is only one past, which is storeed locally as swell as a
videotape. *There is no paradocs, and a wormhole is not a hole in time
but yet another path.

A wormhole is an idiocy invented by Einstein himself. *Period.

A wormhole is no more idiotic than a positive refractor. *Tampon.

fainly a convexiconcave lens