![]() |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Ben" wrote
... First point: Anthony has a great picture here!! Which is a little disconcerting because it should have appeared as a proper little smudge like Tombaugh 5. But it didn't. That means I was seeing something else and Be 17 is going to be another tough object and I may not be able to see it at all. It looks to me like the brighter stars in the image are evenly spread over the field, while the cluster is made up of only dimmer stars. It would probably be a very difficult visual target. George N |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 20, 8:07 pm, "George Normandin"
wrote: "Ben" wrote .. First point: Anthony has a great picture here!! Concurred. It looks to me like the brighter stars in the image are evenly spread over the field, while the cluster is made up of only dimmer stars. It would probably be a very difficult visual target. George N Yes, 6791 is marginal at my location. I'm thinking that I will have to drive into the cotton fields to get Be 17. (If it's possible to see at all with a 10") Ben |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Berkeley 17 in Auriga | Anthony Ayiomamitis | Amateur Astronomy | 13 | March 21st 07 02:22 AM |
NGC 2281 in Auriga | Anthony Ayiomamitis | Amateur Astronomy | 6 | March 9th 07 01:15 PM |
NGC 2281 in Auriga | Anthony Ayiomamitis | UK Astronomy | 4 | March 9th 07 01:15 PM |
M36 / NGC 1960 in Auriga | Anthony Ayiomamitis | Amateur Astronomy | 24 | January 15th 07 04:34 PM |
M36 / NGC 1960 in Auriga | Anthony Ayiomamitis | UK Astronomy | 23 | January 15th 07 04:34 PM |