![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The thread on having to leaving Earth within 25 years got me thinking.
What would be achievable? This is a useful policy question, as sometimes it helps to see the obstacles. When reengineering a process, you can sometimes struggle to make a 5% improvement. Then you hear that a competitor has made a 90% improvement. Just this knowledge alone suddenly clarifies the way forward. So what could be achieved? Is launch capacity a serious obstacle. If America had to, it could launch 1 shuttle C per day at a unit cost of $100 million. That would be $36 billion for 36,000 tons to orbit per year. Much cheaper than the Defence budget. But what would be the next obstacle? - We still don't know how to build closed system life support gear. - For really large colonies we would still need to process lunar or NEO material - To do so we would need to manufacture solar panels in space What else? Once we know what could be achieved, we ask, apart from money, what's stopping us. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|