![]() |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote in message
ups.com... How does the foam differentiate between junk and still-functional satellites (or the ISS), whose orbits cross paths with said junk? In my story, the Kessler Syndrome had already taken out all of the satellites in a specific Earth orbit (except for a manned space station, which was moved), so there were no functional satellites left to be of concern. -- Regards, Mike Combs ---------------------------------------------------------------------- By all that you hold dear on this good Earth I bid you stand, Men of the West! Aragorn |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message ups.com... On Feb 7, 8:49 am, "Alex Terrell" wrote: On 7 Feb, 07:30, " wrote: Mike Combs wrote: I once wrote a short sf story where I recommended a series of counter-orbiting foam spheres: Deadly Debrishttp://members.aol.com/howiecombs/deaddebr.htm I have no real idea whether such a thing would work in the real world or not, though. If the foam has the total cross-section of one square kilometer, it would take a few thousand years to do the job. How do you get this? The thing sweeps an orbit every 45 minutes, or 10,000 times per year. That would allow it to sweep a halo with a CSA of 10,000km, say 100km by 10km. This may not work for all space debris, but if there's a specific problem orbit.... How does the foam differentiate between junk and still-functional satellites (or the ISS), whose orbits cross paths with said junk? Functional objects maunevour out of the way. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Space junk problem rising to new heights [EAS jettison, mid-2007] | Jim Oberg | Space Shuttle | 85 | December 15th 06 08:47 AM |
Space junk problem rising to new heights [EAS jettison, mid-2007] | Jim Oberg | Space Station | 74 | December 15th 06 08:47 AM |
sci.space.news junk | Brian Gaff | Space Shuttle | 4 | February 21st 06 06:57 AM |