![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 3 Feb 2004 14:17:09 -0800, (ed kyle) wrote:
What could be new here is an ICBM replacement for Minuteman that might incorporate Pegasus-derived motors. In other words, an ICBM derived from a nonmilitary rocket. OSC has already thought of that, sort of, with its Minotaur booster. See: http://www.orbital.com/SpaceLaunch/Minotaur/index.html ----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups ---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =--- |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 03 Feb 2004 11:38:12 -0500, Michael Gallagher
wrote: On 31 Jan 2004 20:10:20 -0800, (ed kyle) wrote: Now I understand why Orbital Sciences has become so involved in the DoD suborbital business. Aside from the fact OSC has been involved in that for a few years now, it's worth remembering that the Space Shuttle and the Saturn series Saturn I and IB's first stages are loosely derived from Jupiter/Thor. are the only US oribital boosters (does Scout count?) Yes, Scout made orbit from time to time. Brian |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 03 Feb 2004 17:13:23 -0600, Brian Thorn
wrote: Saturn I and IB's first stages are loosely derived from Jupiter/Thor. Ok. Yes, Scout made orbit from time to time. Duh. But was it derived from military hardware? ----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups ---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =--- |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 03 Feb 2004 11:38:12 -0500, Michael Gallagher
wrote: On 31 Jan 2004 20:10:20 -0800, (ed kyle) wrote: Now I understand why Orbital Sciences has become so involved in the DoD suborbital business. Aside from the fact OSC has been involved in that for a few years now, it's worth remembering that the Space Shuttle and the Saturn series Saturn I and IB's first stages are loosely derived from Jupiter/Thor. are the only US oribital boosters (does Scout count?) Yes, Scout made orbit from time to time. Brian |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Michael Gallagher wrote in message . ..
On 31 Jan 2004 20:10:20 -0800, (ed kyle) wrote: Now I understand why Orbital Sciences has become so involved in the DoD suborbital business. Aside from the fact OSC has been involved in that for a few years now, it's worth remembering that the Space Shuttle and the Saturn series are the only US oribital boosters (does Scout count?) not derived from ICBMs. The Atlast V is a descendant of the Altas ICBM; Delta came from the Thor IRBM. And the Titan 3 is obviously a titan ICBM with strap-on solids. For a few years, the USAF used leftover Atlas and Titan ICBMs to lauch small satellites; Clemintine was launched on a Titan 2 out of Vandenberg AFB IIRC. OSC's plan for the OSP Peacekeeper booster ( http://www.orbital.com/SpaceLaunch/OSP2/index.html ) continues the trend, which this SLV/ICBM idea follows. So what else is new? What could be new here is an ICBM replacement for Minuteman that might incorporate Pegasus-derived motors. In other words, an ICBM derived from a nonmilitary rocket. - Ed Kyle |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Michael Gallagher wrote in message . ..
On 31 Jan 2004 20:10:20 -0800, (ed kyle) wrote: Now I understand why Orbital Sciences has become so involved in the DoD suborbital business. Aside from the fact OSC has been involved in that for a few years now, it's worth remembering that the Space Shuttle and the Saturn series are the only US oribital boosters (does Scout count?) not derived from ICBMs. The Atlast V is a descendant of the Altas ICBM; Delta came from the Thor IRBM. And the Titan 3 is obviously a titan ICBM with strap-on solids. For a few years, the USAF used leftover Atlas and Titan ICBMs to lauch small satellites; Clemintine was launched on a Titan 2 out of Vandenberg AFB IIRC. OSC's plan for the OSP Peacekeeper booster ( http://www.orbital.com/SpaceLaunch/OSP2/index.html ) continues the trend, which this SLV/ICBM idea follows. So what else is new? What could be new here is an ICBM replacement for Minuteman that might incorporate Pegasus-derived motors. In other words, an ICBM derived from a nonmilitary rocket. - Ed Kyle |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 31 Jan 2004 20:10:20 -0800, (ed kyle) wrote:
Now I understand why Orbital Sciences has become so involved in the DoD suborbital business. Aside from the fact OSC has been involved in that for a few years now, it's worth remembering that the Space Shuttle and the Saturn series are the only US oribital boosters (does Scout count?) not derived from ICBMs. The Atlast V is a descendant of the Altas ICBM; Delta came from the Thor IRBM. And the Titan 3 is obviously a titan ICBM with strap-on solids. For a few years, the USAF used leftover Atlas and Titan ICBMs to lauch small satellites; Clemintine was launched on a Titan 2 out of Vandenberg AFB IIRC. OSC's plan for the OSP Peacekeeper booster ( http://www.orbital.com/SpaceLaunch/OSP2/index.html ) continues the trend, which this SLV/ICBM idea follows. So what else is new? ----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups ---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =--- |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Allen Thomson wrote in message m... Documents relating to new ICBM requirements are now at http://www.wslfweb.org/space/spacedocs.htm Wish that the Midgetman program would be reconsidered, no reason not to have road mobile missiles, now that Russia has SS-27s in road-mobile launchers. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Minuteman ICBM reaches Mach 1 at 60-ft above launcher? | Rusty B | Policy | 38 | October 27th 03 04:11 PM |
Minuteman ICBM reaches Mach 1 at 60-ft above launcher? | Rusty B | Policy | 3 | October 23rd 03 08:15 AM |