![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Targeting the station's altitude increase would give a Flight Day 1
Rendezvous opportunity for an on-time on-day launch. Maybe they shouldn't waste the Space Station's Rendezvous Targeting Capabilities on the Space Shuttle, because NASA likes to have a few days On-Orbit before rendezvous. Soyuz could launch, rendezvous and dock before bedtime. An added bonus would be an extra couple of days at the Space Station. I would think Private Astronauts (Space Tourists) would much rather get out of the cramped ascent/entry vehicle as soon as possible. I mean really, even if you don't get space sick, do you really want to watch, smell, and hear the fellow who does, vomiting for a day or two? -- Craig Fink Courtesy E-Mail Welcome @ -- On Sat, 02 Dec 2006 07:19:43-0500, John Doe wrote: Isn't the position of the space station more or less random (in practical terms) along the orbital path at the time the plane crosses over KSC ? (aka: launch time for Shuttle) Does increasing the station's altitude (and incresing the time needed for a full orbit) really make such a big change to the relative position of ISS to KSC at the time the orbital plane passes over KSC ? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Orbital mechanics folks...why does the ISS reboost matter? | Lee Jay | Space Shuttle | 47 | February 10th 07 03:08 PM |
Flight Day 1 redezvous with Space Station altitude targeting ( Orbital mechanics folks... | Craig Fink | Space Station | 18 | February 10th 07 03:08 PM |
Commercial Orbital Transportation Services Space Flight Demonstrations | Jim Kingdon | Space Shuttle | 0 | October 31st 05 01:11 AM |
Commercial Orbital Transportation Services Space Flight Demonstrations | Jim Kingdon | Space Station | 0 | October 31st 05 01:11 AM |
Commercial Orbital Transportation Services Space Flight Demonstrations | Bob Haller | Space Station | 0 | October 30th 05 08:49 PM |