A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Space Science » Policy
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

growing crops under artificial lighting



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1  
Old December 13th 03, 03:24 AM
Joe Strout
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default growing crops under artificial lighting

I'm getting tired of the widely-repeated claim that it is impractical to
grow crops under artificial light (particularly if your power source is
solar). It just doesn't make sense, for two reasons. First, if your
solar power plant is in orbit where it receives sunlight 24/7, you've
already got about seven times as much sunlight to start with as a field
on Earth. Second, though there are losses in converting the sunlight to
electricity and back to light, you can make the light you convert it to
be 100% pure clorophyll-absorbed prime wavelength, whereas the light
that falls on Earth is mostly wavelengths that plants can't use anyway.

Put those factors together, and I suspect that a km^2 of solar cells (or
similar solar power collector area) could grow MORE than one km^2 of
crops.

But suspicions aren't worth much; I really need some numbers. And here
my ignorance is getting in the way, and I'd like to correct that.
Can anyone point me to sources of data on absorption spectra for
important crop species, etc.?

I've started googling but have turned up surprisingly little so far.
(E.g., I know the difference between chlorophyll A and B, but I have no
info on what the relative balance between them is for any relevant
plant.)

Thanks,
- Joe

,------------------------------------------------------------------.
| Joseph J. Strout Check out the Mac Web Directory: |
| http://www.macwebdir.com |
`------------------------------------------------------------------'
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Is Artificial Radiation Worse Than Natural? Yes! Anonymous Sender Space Shuttle 3 November 2nd 03 02:06 PM
artificial gravity Johnson.. Space Station 7 August 22nd 03 05:48 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:55 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.