![]() |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jorge R. Frank" wrote in message ... "Lee" wrote in link.net: Blah, Blah, Blah. What a lode. The ISS, a gimmicky method to transport taxpayer dollars to the elites within the space industry. Read Robert Parks book, "Voodoo Science" and get an education. What you and Robert Park don't understand is that science is not the only reason we do manned spaceflight. It's not even the most important reason. It never has been. And it never will be. Seriously, sometimes you build and fly things simply to learn how to build and fly things! If we don't, we'll be stuck on this rock forever... Jeff -- "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety" - B. Franklin, Bartlett's Familiar Quotations (1919) |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I agree, keeping ISS alive and worth doing something constructive is
what should happen. Instead of pushing it into the somewhat lethal and otherwise interactively pesky moon L2 zone, I was rethinking of my previous notions of moving ISS into the Venus-L2(VL2) halo zone of supposedly 1,014,290 km away from that geothermally active and thus somewhat newish orb, is by far the best for all things considered. Parking ISS within Venus L2 for the likes of being fully staffed seems doable because, as such it should become perfectly human DNA survivable for the 19 month stint, although one hell of a killer commute could be a factor. Upon average, I believe VL2 could be cooler for ISS than currently orbiting Earth, and there'd be less cosmic and obviously no moon radiation factors, and even somewhat less solar contributed flak of radiation to deal with. I don't believe there's even any significant amount of those nasty trapped radiation belts to deal with. As compared to orbiting Earth, I tend to believe there shouldn't be 10% the station-keeping demands per month upon reboost or other reactive thrusting demands for having to sustain the orbital halo requirements. One good resupply of fuel per 19 months should be sufficient, along with a few less tonnage deployments of other essential supplies (beer and pizza) getting delivered up to +/- 6 months worth of each 19 month cycle (however, a +/- one month window would be most efficient). Actually, utilizing a solar--steam powered form of reaction thrusting via all that beer should provide sufficient thrusting, all by itself. - Brad Guth -- Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Venus EXPRESS is alive, as is the planet, as is Guth | Art Deco | Misc | 0 | July 6th 06 03:30 AM |
GALACTIC FEDERATION MOTHERSHIPS ALIVE | Saul Levy | Astronomy Misc | 0 | February 8th 06 06:06 AM |
GALACTIC FEDERATION MOTHERSHIPS, ALIVE | REM460 | Astronomy Misc | 0 | April 22nd 04 07:59 AM |
Spirit Rover photo / People alive on Mars ! | M.A.Perafonte' | Misc | 10 | February 2nd 04 02:14 PM |
Hubble. Alive and Well | VTrade | Space Shuttle | 12 | January 21st 04 05:57 AM |