A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Space Science » Space Station
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Keep ISS Alive



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 22nd 06, 03:11 PM posted to sci.space.policy,sci.space.station
Jeff Findley
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 5,012
Default Keep ISS Alive


"Jorge R. Frank" wrote in message
...
"Lee" wrote in
link.net:

Blah, Blah, Blah. What a lode. The ISS, a gimmicky method to transport
taxpayer dollars to the elites within the space industry. Read Robert
Parks book, "Voodoo Science" and get an education.


What you and Robert Park don't understand is that science is not the only
reason we do manned spaceflight. It's not even the most important reason.
It never has been. And it never will be.


Seriously, sometimes you build and fly things simply to learn how to build
and fly things! If we don't, we'll be stuck on this rock forever...

Jeff
--
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a
little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor
safety"
- B. Franklin, Bartlett's Familiar Quotations (1919)


  #2  
Old October 4th 06, 03:46 AM posted to sci.space.station,sci.space.policy
Brad Guth[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,941
Default Keep ISS Alive

I agree, keeping ISS alive and worth doing something constructive is
what should happen.

Instead of pushing it into the somewhat lethal and otherwise
interactively pesky moon L2 zone, I was rethinking of my previous
notions of moving ISS into the Venus-L2(VL2) halo zone of supposedly
1,014,290 km away from that geothermally active and thus somewhat newish
orb, is by far the best for all things considered.

Parking ISS within Venus L2 for the likes of being fully staffed seems
doable because, as such it should become perfectly human DNA survivable
for the 19 month stint, although one hell of a killer commute could be a
factor.

Upon average, I believe VL2 could be cooler for ISS than currently
orbiting Earth, and there'd be less cosmic and obviously no moon
radiation factors, and even somewhat less solar contributed flak of
radiation to deal with.

I don't believe there's even any significant amount of those nasty
trapped radiation belts to deal with.

As compared to orbiting Earth, I tend to believe there shouldn't be 10%
the station-keeping demands per month upon reboost or other reactive
thrusting demands for having to sustain the orbital halo requirements.

One good resupply of fuel per 19 months should be sufficient, along with
a few less tonnage deployments of other essential supplies (beer and
pizza) getting delivered up to +/- 6 months worth of each 19 month cycle
(however, a +/- one month window would be most efficient).

Actually, utilizing a solar--steam powered form of reaction thrusting
via all that beer should provide sufficient thrusting, all by itself.
-
Brad Guth


--
Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Venus EXPRESS is alive, as is the planet, as is Guth Art Deco Misc 0 July 6th 06 03:30 AM
GALACTIC FEDERATION MOTHERSHIPS ALIVE Saul Levy Astronomy Misc 0 February 8th 06 06:06 AM
GALACTIC FEDERATION MOTHERSHIPS, ALIVE REM460 Astronomy Misc 0 April 22nd 04 07:59 AM
Spirit Rover photo / People alive on Mars ! M.A.Perafonte' Misc 10 February 2nd 04 02:14 PM
Hubble. Alive and Well VTrade Space Shuttle 12 January 21st 04 05:57 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:42 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.