![]() |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Rand Simberg wrote: On Sun, 03 Sep 2006 19:57:27 GMT, in a place far, far away, Monte Davis made the phosphor on my monitor glow in such a way as to indicate that: (Henry Spencer) wrote: The world of manifest destiny and wide-eyed dreams is also a world of competing private projects on tight budgets And, inevitably, considerable duplication of effort as the corollary of something good: many innovators trying different solutions. That's how capitalism works. Having two gas stations across the street from each other is obviously "duplication of effort." Socialists see it as waste--capitalists see it as competition. Guess which view generates more wealth, and plunges more prices... That's how new ideas develop, be it private or public. When there are lots of ideas, interest and money, there are new rockets, new gas stations and dot-com companies. When enthusiasm wanes, programs are cut back, stations close and companies fold. Having several programs just means there is as yet no clearly best way to do it, but there is enough money to try anything. John Halpenny |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Rand Simberg" wrote in message ... That's how capitalism works. Having two gas stations across the street from each other is obviously "duplication of effort." Socialists see it as waste--capitalists see it as competition. Guess which view generates more wealth, and plunges more prices... I know a guy at work who cringes when I order something online. He goes on and on about how globally inefficient it is for a company like Amazon to ship books all over the globe by, of all things, FedEx, UPS, and even the USPS! It would be far more efficient for me to shop at the local bookstores and take advantage of their globally more efficient distribution system... Too bad the local bookstores never carry the, admittedly obscure, books I need to do my freaking job! I could waste my time trying to track these things down locally, but why when I can get the book I need in my hands usually by the next business day if I pay for overnight shipping? Jeff -- "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety" - B. Franklin, Bartlett's Familiar Quotations (1919) |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jeff Findley" wrote in message ... "Rand Simberg" wrote in message ... That's how capitalism works. Having two gas stations across the street from each other is obviously "duplication of effort." Socialists see it as waste--capitalists see it as competition. Guess which view generates more wealth, and plunges more prices... I know a guy at work who cringes when I order something online. He goes on and on about how globally inefficient it is for a company like Amazon to ship books all over the globe by, of all things, FedEx, UPS, and even the USPS! It would be far more efficient for me to shop at the local bookstores and take advantage of their globally more efficient distribution system... Huh, and how does he think the bookstores get their books? They magically appear on the shelves? |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Greg D. Moore (Strider)" wrote in message ink.net... "Jeff Findley" wrote in message ... I know a guy at work who cringes when I order something online. He goes on and on about how globally inefficient it is for a company like Amazon to ship books all over the globe by, of all things, FedEx, UPS, and even the USPS! It would be far more efficient for me to shop at the local bookstores and take advantage of their globally more efficient distribution system... Huh, and how does he think the bookstores get their books? They magically appear on the shelves? No, but he feels that they're shipped by more fuel efficient means than by overnight air. He does have a point there. If I always paid for ground shipping, the fuel usage would be lower. The part he's missing is that those thousands of bookstores are themselves largely inefficient. Trying to locally stock thousands of books and expecting them to be an exact match for local demand is wishful thinking. In the end, the books that don't sell are either given a steep discount to move them off the shelves, or they're shipped back to a warehouse where they're sold to book liquidation stores, shipped to their warehouse, and finally shipped to local discount stores where they're sold at a steep discount. Jeff -- "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety" - B. Franklin, Bartlett's Familiar Quotations (1919) |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Rusty wrote:
LockMart Wins CEV Contract - NASAWATCH http://www.nasawatch.com/ http://blogs.orlandosentinel.com/new...thewritestuff/ -Rusty Looks like lockmart is getting all available aerospace bound taxpayers money. After awarding all military planes contracts to lockeed is the government trying to kill the competition in the space arena too? Aviation Week states that the choice was made because "they promised to fly sooner". LOL. That reminds me of the ATF competition when YF-22 was selected because "closer to production standard". 15 years later USAF fielded their first operational F-22. A promise is just a promise, should not be among selection criteria. So American taxpayers will pay 8 billions for a scaled up Apollo replica. One would say: let's choose the ones who made the original hardware. Nope. Let's choose lockmart design whose "only resemblance to the original Apollo CM stops at the service module". In fact it is solar powered and it's arrays are shaped like round pizza pans instead of long rectangles. I am astounded by the courage shown in this incredible innovation. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Stefano wrote: ...One would say: let's choose the ones who made the original hardware. Nope... Not an option. North American Aviation is gone, and so are almost all of its people -- certainly all of the ones who had high-level design roles, since they were mostly fairly senior even then. Its corporate heirs have very little connection with the 1960s company. Let's choose lockmart design whose "only resemblance to the original Apollo CM stops at the service module". As has been noted already, the top marks in the Apollo CM competition went to Martin Corporation, the Mart in LockMart. -- spsystems.net is temporarily off the air; | Henry Spencer mail to henry at zoo.utoronto.ca instead. | |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 06 Sep 2006 22:15:56 +0200, Stefano
wrote: That reminds me of the ATF competition when YF-22 was selected because "closer to production standard". ....Read: "It doesn't look as cool as the YF-23". I'm still convinced the Air Farce should have found a way to secure both planes, because both were superior designs. OM -- ]=====================================[ ] OMBlog - http://www.io.com/~o_m/omworld [ ] Let's face it: Sometimes you *need* [ ] an obnoxious opinion in your day! [ ]=====================================[ |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 06 Sep 2006 22:15:56 +0200, Stefano
wrote: Nope. Let's choose lockmart design whose "only resemblance to the original Apollo CM stops at the service module". In fact it is solar powered and it's arrays are shaped like round pizza pans instead of long rectangles. I am astounded by the courage shown in this incredible innovation. ....Mark my words: those solar arrays will be rectangular by the time the first test article gets launched. OM -- ]=====================================[ ] OMBlog - http://www.io.com/~o_m/omworld [ ] Let's face it: Sometimes you *need* [ ] an obnoxious opinion in your day! [ ]=====================================[ |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 07 Sep 2006 06:15:31 -0500, OM
wrote: ...Mark my words: those solar arrays will be rectangular by the time the first test article gets launched. AvWeek said something about the pizza-pan arrays being more stable in maneuvers, so maybe not. Brian |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Brian Thorn wrote: On Thu, 07 Sep 2006 06:15:31 -0500, OM wrote: ...Mark my words: those solar arrays will be rectangular by the time the first test article gets launched. AvWeek said something about the pizza-pan arrays being more stable in maneuvers, so maybe not. Brian http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/co..._contract.html Lockmart is building the Mars 2007 Phoenix lander. Guess the shape of the solar arrays. http://phoenix.lpl.arizona.edu/multi...ander_nobg.jpg http://phoenix.lpl.arizona.edu/multi...=1&image_id=32 http://phoenix.lpl.arizona.edu/techn...spacecraft.php Rusty |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Ottawa's EMS wins key component design contract for NASA's next giantspace telescope (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Astronomy Misc | 0 | September 26th 05 05:00 PM |
Aerojet Wins NASA Contract for Electric Propulsion Demonstrator | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | June 3rd 05 12:42 AM |
N° 40-2004 - ESA signs a 1 Billion Euro contract with EADS Space Transportation | Jacques van Oene | Space Station | 0 | July 9th 04 11:20 PM |
NASA Awards Space Station Cargo Mission Contract | Ron Baalke | Space Shuttle | 2 | November 7th 03 02:55 PM |
NASA Awards Space Station Cargo Mission Contract | Ron Baalke | Space Station | 2 | November 7th 03 02:55 PM |