![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
G. R. L. Cowan wrote:
... Hydrogen is one-ninth the mass of the water it is in ... but if you want to bring water to somewhere it isn't, 9 kg of it in a 0.5-kg tank beats 1 kg of liquid hydrogen in a 15-to-40-kg tank, even if oxygen is free at the destination. (Very big liquid hydrogen tanks able to contain tens or hundreds of tonnes of it can have more favorable containment-to-payload mass ratios. 15.3 is the lowest I've heard of at car scale, however.) The hydrogen won't be in liquid form otherwise I would have no problem getting the water to liquify. Perhaps mildly pressurized, 4 bar. Bob Clark |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Robert Clark wrote:
G. R. L. Cowan wrote: ... Hydrogen is one-ninth the mass of the water it is in ... but if you want to bring water to somewhere it isn't, 9 kg of it in a 0.5-kg tank beats 1 kg of liquid hydrogen in a 15-to-40-kg tank, even if oxygen is free at the destination. (Very big liquid hydrogen tanks able to contain tens or hundreds of tonnes of it can have more favorable containment-to-payload mass ratios. 15.3 is the lowest I've heard of at car scale, however.) The hydrogen won't be in liquid form otherwise I would have no problem getting the water to liquify. Perhaps mildly pressurized, 4 bar. 4 bar?! That makes the choice (a) carry 9 kg of ready-made water in a 0.5-kg tank or (b) carry 1 kg of hydrogen in, like, a 1.8-m-dia spherical tank, maybe 160 kg if walled with 2-mm steel. But I suppose if you never let the pressure get down near 1 bar, it can have a tension wall, and not be rigid. Not quite so heavy. --- G. R. L. Cowan, former hydrogen fan Boron: internal combustion, nuclear cachet: http://www.eagle.ca/~gcowan/Paper_for_11th_CHC.html |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Robert Clark wrote: Batteries would not give you *liquid* water while carrying 1/8th the weight of the water in fuel. That's an important part of my application. Are you building a space vehicle? |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Robert Clark wrote:
G. R. L. Cowan wrote: ... Hydrogen is one-ninth the mass of the water it is in ... but if you want to bring water to somewhere it isn't, 9 kg of it in a 0.5-kg tank beats 1 kg of liquid hydrogen in a 15-to-40-kg tank, even if oxygen is free at the destination. (Very big liquid hydrogen tanks able to contain tens or hundreds of tonnes of it can have more favorable containment-to-payload mass ratios. 15.3 is the lowest I've heard of at car scale, however.) The hydrogen won't be in liquid form otherwise I would have no problem getting the water to liquify. Perhaps mildly pressurized, 4 bar. Bob Clark The more you describe your ap, the less sense it makes. http://www.tinaja.com/glib/energfun.pdf -- Many thanks, Don Lancaster voice phone: (928)428-4073 Synergetics 3860 West First Street Box 809 Thatcher, AZ 85552 rss: http://www.tinaja.com/whtnu.xml email: Please visit my GURU's LAIR web site at http://www.tinaja.com |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Robert Clark wrote: For my application I need a hydrogen/oxygen fuel cell to produce the H2O in liquid form. But in addition to the electrical energy, the reaction releases a significant proportion of the energy as heat. Enough heat in fact to turn the H2O released into steam. I know on space missions they use fuel cells to produce liquid water but I assume they use the cryogenic fuels onboard to liquify the water. Is there a way to insure the water released is in liquid form for the H2 and O2 at room temperature? Try using the cell's output to power a refrigerator to cool it. Less facetiously, you might try condensing the water in a radiator. The heat has to go *somewhere*. Tom Davidson Richmond, VA |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Robert Clark wrote: Don Lancaster wrote: You have to recognize that converting water vapor to liquid consumes energy and has to be charged against the fuel cell efficiency budget. Batteries are almost certainly more cost effective. http://www.tinaja.com/glib/energfun.pdf Batteries would not give you *liquid* water while carrying 1/8th the weight of the water in fuel. That's an important part of my application. You specifically need/want the water ? I liked the liquid N2 idea for the condensor btw. Dry Ice would be another possible and easier to handle. Graham |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Don Lancaster wrote: The more you describe your ap, the less sense it makes. I've been thinking that too. Unless it *is* a spacecraft ! Graham |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]() tadchem wrote: Try using the cell's output to power a refrigerator to cool it. I'm *so* glad that was a joke ! You nearly had me going there. ;~) Graham |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 16 Aug 2006 22:48:27 GMT, Dan Bloomquist
wrote: Robert Clark wrote: Batteries would not give you *liquid* water while carrying 1/8th the weight of the water in fuel. That's an important part of my application. Are you building a space vehicle? I think he is, yes! I do hope he isn't planning on using the power from the fuel cells to drive a great big fan at the back... -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Improved lunar landing architecture | Alex Terrell | Policy | 183 | September 22nd 05 01:32 AM |
Mars Colonization | Remy Villeneuve | Policy | 36 | January 3rd 04 12:07 AM |
Gravitation and Maxwell's Electrodynamics, BOUNDARY CONDITIONS | [email protected] \(formerly\) | Astronomy Misc | 273 | December 28th 03 10:42 PM |
The Measure of Water: NASA Creates New Map for the Atmosphere | Ron Baalke | Science | 0 | December 5th 03 04:57 PM |