A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Others » Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #12  
Old July 8th 06, 09:16 PM posted to alt.astronomy
Warhol[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 5,588
Default A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification


Phineas T Puddleduck schreef:

On 8/7/06 20:14, in article
, "Warhol"
wrote:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

In summary....

For lies - you would be 'handsomely rewarded' by the ZOG in Washington.

For truth - you would be put in jail (unless you're a Jew) and the key
thrown away by the ZOG in Washington.



Welcome to WarholWorld. Its like Disneyland, but even less believable. Plus
the characters aren't funny.

--


Just connect the dots... the criminals remain the same tru history
anyway...

The famous "first human path on the moon" in the Warhol World...

Is impossible! For to print a foothprint like that in the moon dust,
you need moisture and there is NO moisture on the moon!

Here is the picture from "moon landing " expedition.

http://www.primeline-america.com/moon-ldg/

Personally, I like the best the moon scooter with that radial (inverted
parasol-like) antenna, wow, that's cute... Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha Halo
alpha papa tango charly we are riding on the Moon... hi hi hi the
American dream... you take your car everywhere with you...even to the
moon... aint that a funny joke.

  #13  
Old July 8th 06, 09:18 PM posted to alt.astronomy,alt.usenet.kooks
Phineas T Puddleduck[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 310
Default A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on themoon - photogrammetric rectification




On 8/7/06 21:16, in article
, "Warhol"
wrote:

Just connect the dots... the criminals remain the same tru history
anyway...

The famous "first human path on the moon" in the Warhol World...

Is impossible! For to print a foothprint like that in the moon dust,
you need moisture and there is NO moisture on the moon!


Your knowledge of science is breahtaking in its scope. As in, narrowness of
them.


Here is the picture from "moon landing " expedition.

http://www.primeline-america.com/moon-ldg/

Personally, I like the best the moon scooter with that radial (inverted
parasol-like) antenna, wow, that's cute... Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha Halo
alpha papa tango charly we are riding on the Moon... hi hi hi the
American dream... you take your car everywhere with you...even to the
moon... aint that a funny joke.


Whats it like being an utter ****wit, Warhol? Riding the tails of the space
cadets...


--

Relf's Law? -+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
"Bull**** repeated to the limit of infinity asymptotically approaches
the odour of roses."
Corollary -+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
³It approaches the asymptote faster, the more Œpseduos¹ you throw in your
formulas.²
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Jaffa cakes. Sweet delicious orange jaffa goodness, and an abject lesson
Why parroting information from the web will not teach you cosmology.
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Official emperor of sci.physics, head mumbler of the "Cult of INSANE
SCIENCE". Pay no attention to my butt poking forward, it is expanding.
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+




  #14  
Old July 8th 06, 09:39 PM posted to alt.astronomy,alt.usenet.kooks
Warhol[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 5,588
Default A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification


Phineas T Puddleduck schreef:

On 8/7/06 21:16, in article
, "Warhol"
wrote:

Just connect the dots... the criminals remain the same tru history
anyway...

The famous "first human path on the moon" in the Warhol World...

Is impossible! For to print a foothprint like that in the moon dust,
you need moisture and there is NO moisture on the moon!


Your knowledge of science is breahtaking in its scope. As in, narrowness of
them.


oops and you bitch are ugly! HAH...


Here is the picture from "moon landing " expedition.

http://www.primeline-america.com/moon-ldg/

Personally, I like the best the moon scooter with that radial (inverted
parasol-like) antenna, wow, that's cute... Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha Halo
alpha papa tango charly we are riding on the Moon... hi hi hi the
American dream... you take your car everywhere with you...even to the
moon... aint that a funny joke.


Whats it like being an utter ****wit, Warhol? Riding the tails of the space
cadets...


--


Also, have you ever compared the "moon" videos space combinations to
those that are used actually and then in lower orbit?

With the solar eruptions that occured during that first "moon mission"
the astronauts would had their DNA fried...

  #15  
Old July 8th 06, 09:40 PM posted to alt.astronomy,alt.usenet.kooks
Phineas T Puddleduck[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 310
Default A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on themoon - photogrammetric rectification




On 8/7/06 21:39, in article
, "Warhol"
wrote:


Also, have you ever compared the "moon" videos space combinations to
those that are used actually and then in lower orbit?

With the solar eruptions that occured during that first "moon mission"
the astronauts would had their DNA fried...


When you get your science from Brad "kooky" Guth, I'm not surprised you come
up with such ill educated bull****.

--

Relf's Law? -+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
"Bull**** repeated to the limit of infinity asymptotically approaches
the odour of roses."
Corollary -+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
³It approaches the asymptote faster, the more Œpseduos¹ you throw in your
formulas.²
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Jaffa cakes. Sweet delicious orange jaffa goodness, and an abject lesson
Why parroting information from the web will not teach you cosmology.
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Official emperor of sci.physics, head mumbler of the "Cult of INSANE
SCIENCE". Pay no attention to my butt poking forward, it is expanding.
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+




  #16  
Old July 8th 06, 09:44 PM posted to alt.astronomy,alt.astronomy.solar,alt.sci.planetary,alt.archaeology,alt.conspiracy
Anonymous[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 7
Default A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

PS Independent reconstruction of an accurate and reliable
NASA chronology for those Apollo photos which reveal
with reasonable certainty a single light source "Look!
the sun looks just like a giant spotlight!" etc., that
would be the obvious place to start building your case.

If enough "manned" Apollo photographs can be positively
identified to have been taken at an approximate time GMT,
and from -which- of the aforecited six allegedly "manned"
landing locations on the (1969-1972) surface of the Moon,
then it would be a relatively simple task to key in the
data into any good astronomy program--and see who's who,
and what's what. Better astronomy programs, like Astrolog,
can show at light-geocentric positions from other planets.
Some may even include topocentric positions from the Moon,
complete with her librations, etc., for maximum accuracy?

It'll be interesting to see if any capable lurkers out
there take you up on your interesting challenge. Given
all the other glaring mistakes NASA made with the hoaxed
"manned moon" photos, it's very doubtful that they went
to the trouble of synchronizing the terrestrial shadows
cast on their top-secret sets under powerful spotlights
with what would have actually occurred on the Moon, i.e.
at the lunar surface coordinates and times entered into
the official NASA Apollo program record. One, does such
a record exist? And Two, is it available to the public?

But of course, the NASA shills are likely to cherry-pick
any photos that by coincidence apparently match the date,
time -and- place alleged. Conversely, those like me who
are 100% certain that all allegedly "manned" segments of
the Apollo Moon missions beyond ~450 miles above sealevel
were obviously staged, we might cherry-pick only the most
patently impossible photos from the list. That's why this
would need to be an independent, scientific investigation,
where those leading the investigation have no axe to grind.

Otherwise, any findings predominantly pro or con would be
immediately suspect, and called into question by opposing
forces, as with all other evidences that have already been
presented and published by renowned experts on the subject.

Enjoy!
Daniel Joseph Min

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQA/AwUBRLALVJljD7YrHM/nEQLnFQCg6ADKNMjwtMf/ZVyZ5rlG7+2iam4AoJZb
n/E/fgA8C4oxZeGXkZPEfRte
=XARa
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

  #18  
Old July 8th 06, 11:19 PM posted to alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks
Art Deco[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,280
Default A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification

Warhol wrote:

Aldrin was asked to swear on the bible that he went to the moon... and
surprisse surprisse .. He REFUSED to answer the question, if they realy
went up there... the only place where they have been is the dessert of
neveda... POINT for the Moon File... Let them now proof to me that
right now the Astronuts are in the international space station ISS...
even that they cant proof... ALL SPACE PROGRAMS are FAKE...


http://www.csicop.org/articles/20021018-aldrin/

Eat it, naziboi.

--
COOSN-266-06-39716
Official Associate AFA-B Vote Rustler
Official Overseer of Kooks and Saucerheads in alt.astronomy
Co-Winner, alt.(f)lame Worst Flame War, December 2005
Official "Usenet psychopath and born-again LLPOF minion",
as designated by Brad Guth

"And without accurate measuring techniques, how can they even
*call* quantum theory a "scientific" one? How can it possibly
be referred to as a "fundamental branch of physics"?"
-- Painsnuh the Lamer

"Well, orientals moved to the U.S. and did amazingly well on
their own, and the races are related (brown)."
-- "Honest" John pontificates on racial purity

"Significant new ideas have rarely come from the ranks of
the establishment."
-- Double-A on technology development
  #19  
Old July 8th 06, 11:32 PM posted to alt.astronomy,alt.astronomy.solar,alt.sci.planetary,alt.archaeology,alt.conspiracy
cdddraftsman
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8
Default A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification

Well from now on , you would do everyone a big favor by believing it in
private . I seem to recall a certain bombing in Okalahoma that might
have been caused by such stupid and senseless speculation , by blabber
mouthed people who wouldn't know a assassin or conspiracy unless they
where shot in the kester by one . I noticed also how you neatly shied
away from answering my question . How we could stop the soviets , from
not telling everyone that we didn't go to the moon and it was faked .
If they knew it was fake , do you really believe or feel or what ever
you do , in place of thinking , think they would of remained quiet ?
Answer the question Prof. Q . Tom Lowry PS : Prof. of what ? Hocus
Pocus ? Smoke & Mirrors ?


Professor Min wrote:
On 8 Jul 2006 "cdddraftsman" got angry and top-posted in his rage:
You Are...
snipped juvenile rant


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

It's like I always tell my fellow Republicans, with whom certain
of us may find disagreement with others among us over particular
issues, to wit illegal immigration, the JFK assassination, should
draconian antichrist Atheism remain the official State religion of
America, should aborting (murdering) unborn children remain legal,
the antique Beatles-era Apollo "men-to-the-moon" fish story, etc.:

As long as you don't (seriously) violate any laws of the land,
and as long as you register & vote Republican across-the-board,
you're entitled to believe whatever you want. You can believe
in the freakin tooth fairy if it makes you feel any better.

Enjoy!
Daniel Joseph Min

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQA/AwUBRK/0tZljD7YrHM/nEQLeggCgpoquTvKlgC6qPma7qJ3iXHAnUgkAn2PI
283wgej79AYXpZscfIy0QCyE
=EuL/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


  #20  
Old July 8th 06, 11:55 PM posted to alt.astronomy
Starlord
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,908
Default A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification

Professor Min ? This guy most likly never made it past high school IF that
far at all. If he's a Professor, I'm the POPE.



--
The Lone Sidewalk Astronomer of Rosamond

Telescope Buyers FAQ
http://home.inreach.com/starlord
Sidewalk Astronomy
www.sidewalkastronomy.info
Astronomy Net Online Gift Shop
http://www.cafepress.com/astronomy_net
In Garden Online Gift Shop
http://www.cafepress.com/ingarden
Blast Off Online Gift Shop
http://www.cafepress.com/starlords
Astro Blog
http://starlord.bloggerteam.com/




"cdddraftsman" wrote in message
oups.com...


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Space Calendar - March 23, 2006 baalke@earthlink.net News 0 March 23rd 06 04:17 PM
Space Calendar - February 22, 2006 baalke@earthlink.net History 0 February 22nd 06 05:21 PM
Space Calendar - February 22, 2006 baalke@earthlink.net News 0 February 22nd 06 05:20 PM
Space Calendar - December 21, 2005 baalke@earthlink.net History 0 December 21st 05 04:50 PM
Space Calendar - December 23, 2004 baalke@earthlink.net Astronomy Misc 0 December 23rd 04 04:03 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:25 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.