![]() |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jon G Wrote:
Hello folks, I'm very new to all this and am keen to take a few photos to show friends and family what the views through my telescope are like. I'm confused as to which way to go because I have three camera options! Scope is a 8" Bresser Messier Newtonian. Cameras a Pentax MZ5n film SLR Pentax KA bayonet Pentax ME Super film SLR circa 1980 Pentax K bayonet manual focus Fuji Finepix 4900 3 Megapixel digital seee Trust webcam Jonathan I would recommend getting yourself a Phillips Toucam Pro II and the required adapter and have a go at planetary imaging. Your mount should be perfectly adequate for this; there's many more problems in getting a night with good seeing and with little or no wind. There is a learning curve to get up when processing the results in Registax but it's not too hard and when you get a decent result one feels exceeedingly chuffed to have an image of a planet that's 1200 million kilometre away. - Mike http://www.geocities.com/evmurph/images |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
OK - lots of good advice here and I'm most grateful. The next question is
whether to go for a Philips Toucam pro or a Meade LPI. I'm mostly wanting to photograph planets and brighter deep sky objects such as Orion Nebula etc and Andromeda. Which is most suitable because there isn't much in it pricewise if you buy the Toucam £40 + IR blocking filter (£25) and an adapter (£25) - would the Meade be a better bet for a beginner? Thanks, Jonathan "Mike Murphy" evmurph.zetnet@co@uk wrote in message ... Jon G Wrote: Hello folks, I'm very new to all this and am keen to take a few photos to show friends and family what the views through my telescope are like. I'm confused as to which way to go because I have three camera options! Scope is a 8" Bresser Messier Newtonian. Cameras a Pentax MZ5n film SLR Pentax KA bayonet Pentax ME Super film SLR circa 1980 Pentax K bayonet manual focus Fuji Finepix 4900 3 Megapixel digital seee Trust webcam Jonathan I would recommend getting yourself a Phillips Toucam Pro II and the required adapter and have a go at planetary imaging. Your mount should be perfectly adequate for this; there's many more problems in getting a night with good seeing and with little or no wind. There is a learning curve to get up when processing the results in Registax but it's not too hard and when you get a decent result one feels exceeedingly chuffed to have an image of a planet that's 1200 million kilometre away. - Mike http://www.geocities.com/evmurph/images |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jon G" wrote in message ... OK - lots of good advice here and I'm most grateful. The next question is whether to go for a Philips Toucam pro or a Meade LPI. I'm mostly wanting to photograph planets and brighter deep sky objects such as Orion Nebula etc and Andromeda. Which is most suitable because there isn't much in it pricewise if you buy the Toucam £40 + IR blocking filter (£25) and an adapter (£25) - would the Meade be a better bet for a beginner? Thanks, Jonathan "Mike Murphy" evmurph.zetnet@co@uk wrote in message ... Jon G Wrote: Hello folks, I'm very new to all this and am keen to take a few photos to show friends and family what the views through my telescope are like. I'm confused as to which way to go because I have three camera options! Scope is a 8" Bresser Messier Newtonian. Cameras a Pentax MZ5n film SLR Pentax KA bayonet Pentax ME Super film SLR circa 1980 Pentax K bayonet manual focus Fuji Finepix 4900 3 Megapixel digital seee Trust webcam Jonathan I would recommend getting yourself a Phillips Toucam Pro II and the required adapter and have a go at planetary imaging. Your mount should be perfectly adequate for this; there's many more problems in getting a night with good seeing and with little or no wind. There is a learning curve to get up when processing the results in Registax but it's not too hard and when you get a decent result one feels exceeedingly chuffed to have an image of a planet that's 1200 million kilometre away. - Mike http://www.geocities.com/evmurph/images |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Robin Leadbeater" wrote in message ... "Jon G" wrote in message ... OK - lots of good advice here and I'm most grateful. The next question is whether to go for a Philips Toucam pro or a Meade LPI. I'm mostly wanting to photograph planets and brighter deep sky objects such as Orion Nebula etc and Andromeda. Which is most suitable because there isn't much in it pricewise if you buy the Toucam £40 + IR blocking filter (£25) and an adapter (£25) - would the Meade be a better bet for a beginner? Thanks, Jonathan Ehem.... as I was saying ;-) Hi Jonathan I personally would go for the Toucam. With it you have the potential to take high quality planetary images. Neither are any good for DSO. Both would just about be able to show the brightest objects (the LPI perhaps a bit more so because of its longer exposure limit) but you will not be able to produce anything you would want to show anyone else. Your other choice might be a NexImage which is a Toucam in Celestron clothing and like the Toucam, can be converted for long exposures using the Steve Chambers mod. The mod involves some microsurgery but is much less fiddly to do on the Neximage compared with the Toucam. Robin |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
John Hopkins-Led Team Present 3rd Hubble Option | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | February 3rd 05 12:13 AM |
Probably Dumb Questions | John | Research | 49 | May 6th 04 09:01 AM |
NASA Exercises Delta II Contract Option For STEREO | Ron Baalke | Astronomy Misc | 0 | November 14th 03 11:25 PM |
NASA Exercises Delta II Contract Option For STEREO | Ron Baalke | Misc | 0 | November 14th 03 11:25 PM |
12" Newtonian with 6% secondary | optidud | Amateur Astronomy | 57 | August 8th 03 07:48 AM |