![]() |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Iordani" wrote in message ... Iordani wrote: groups.google.com/group/uk.sci.astronomy/browse_frm/thread/b08a38ab877980ed For some reason this link doesn't come out as "clickable" ....because it doesn't have http:// in front of it. Texy |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Iordani" wrote in message ... Iordani wrote: groups.google.com/group/uk.sci.astronomy/browse_frm/thread/b08a38ab877980ed For some reason this link doesn't come out as "clickable" ....because it doesn't have http:// in front of it. Texy |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , speedbird011
@hotmail.com says... Is finding things really just a case of trying to point the finder at what seems to be the right bit of sky and wiggling it around until the object comes into view? Yes, basically! I have a Telrad finder, and love it (although others have reported not finding them so easy to use). Finding things consists of... (a) Fit low power eyepiece (b) Look at star chart, memorise position of object relative to a few identifiable nearby stars (c) Point the bullseye at that location Sometimes a bit of wiggling is needed if there are no obvious reference stars nearby, though that could be a serious problem if you've got bad light pollution. Having said that, £55 seems like a lot of money for a couple of bits of plastic! http://www.greenwich-observatory.co....n/sh000001.pl? REFPAGE=http%3a%2f%2fwww%2egreenwich%2dobservatory %2eco%2euk%2facatalog% 2findex%2ehtml&WD=telrad&SHOP=%20&PN=AC050_to_AC09 9%2ehtml%23aBCF_ 2dAC079#aBCF_2dAC079 -- Cheers, John |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() John Aldridge wrote: In article , speedbird011 @hotmail.com says... Is finding things really just a case of trying to point the finder at what seems to be the right bit of sky and wiggling it around until the object comes into view? Yes, basically! I have a Telrad finder, and love it (although others have reported not finding them so easy to use). Finding things consists of... (a) Fit low power eyepiece (b) Look at star chart, memorise position of object relative to a few identifiable nearby stars (c) Point the bullseye at that location Sometimes a bit of wiggling is needed if there are no obvious reference stars nearby, though that could be a serious problem if you've got bad light pollution. Having said that, £55 seems like a lot of money for a couple of bits of plastic! Make your own - I did! Article on my website in sig. -- Graham W http://www.gcw.org.uk/ PGM-FI page updated, Graphics Tutorial WIMBORNE http://www.wessex-astro-society.freeserve.co.uk/ Wessex Dorset UK Astro Society's Web pages, Info, Meeting Dates, Sites & Maps Change 'news' to 'sewn' in my Reply address to avoid my spam filter. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
RAT NOTES - TEC 200 F9 Triplet Apochromat - 09/01/04 | Ratboy99 | Amateur Astronomy | 22 | September 5th 04 05:38 PM |
Moons as Disks, Shadow Transits and Saturn's Divisions | edz | Amateur Astronomy | 1 | March 10th 04 09:57 PM |