Neutron star and no black hole

I've worked in the electronics field since the days when the Lord said, "Let
there be light" and I've only just thought to ask this very basic question.

Since the nucleus of an atom holds a number of positive protons and
since like charges repel what stops everything blowing apart?

"Stan" wrote in message . ..
I've worked in the electronics field since the days when the Lord said, "Let
there be light" and I've only just thought to ask this very basic question.

Since the nucleus of an atom holds a number of positive protons and
since like charges repel what stops everything blowing apart?

The strong force holds the nucleus together. It's much
stronger than the electric force at close range.

Um, it's been a while, but isn't renormalization of the electron in QED
still a problem? There's an infinity that doesn't go away. This is
likely a problem in the mathematical description, but I think that
black holes are really tears in the "fabric of space-time".

When it comes to the original question fo the missing black hole in the
open cluster, I wonder if the problem here isn't simply and
overesitmate of the mass. We don't need to invoke dark energy to solve
this. (I'll admit that it is an interesting possibility.) I know that
there are those who believe that dwarf sphereoidals aren't all that
massive.

JD

"Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler." -
Albert Einstein

Comparing a neutron star to a black hole is not bad thinking. One is a
grape(neutron star) the black hole is the prune. Reality is if a neutron
star lost its spin it would be black bert

"G=EMC^2 Glazier" ha scritto nel messaggio
...
Comparing a neutron star to a black hole is not bad thinking. One is a
grape(neutron star) the black hole is the prune. Reality is if a neutron
star lost its spin it would be black bert

You can't compare a neutron star which doesn't require new physics laws to
black holes distorcing the universe structure.
And saying that a neutron star lost its spin is a nonsense, a neutron star
must rotate at high speed...

Luigi Caselli

Hi Luigi Since neutron stars all spin at different speeds shows some
spin very slow. Afraid Luigi you have jumped to fast and I have given
Pulsars a lot of thinking. My thinking comes out of the fact that if the
Earth lies within the sweep of the beam,we can detect the emission as a
periodic series of radio bursts,modulated at the spin period of the
neutron star. Reality is Luigi pulsars are the most stable clocks in
the universe,but thet do slow down. When they stop spinning the radio
mechanism ceases to work. That means the pulsar becomes inert(black) I
can give the reason for slowing spin if you would like?
I'm afraid my thinking comes out of classic imperial thoughts of those
that write for Google. Sad but true I did not have to go to
Google,but know over time Google is stealing my thoughts. Bert

"G=EMC^2 Glazier" ha scritto nel messaggio
...
Hi Luigi Since neutron stars all spin at different speeds shows some
spin very slow. Afraid Luigi you have jumped to fast and I have given
Pulsars a lot of thinking. My thinking comes out of the fact that if the
Earth lies within the sweep of the beam,we can detect the emission as a
periodic series of radio bursts,modulated at the spin period of the
neutron star. Reality is Luigi pulsars are the most stable clocks in
the universe,but thet do slow down. When they stop spinning the radio
mechanism ceases to work. That means the pulsar becomes inert(black) I
can give the reason for slowing spin if you would like?

But a pulsar without spin is not a black hole, it's just a black and inert
old pulsar...

Lugi Caselli

Hi Luigi Right you are it is not pulsing giving out radio photon
burst. Best call it a 20 mile in diameter round object with the mass
about 8 times greater than the Sun. Like it is written a type 2
supernova always leave behind a neutron star. I'll throw this in a
neutron stars gravity can compress all of humankind into an area the
size of a walnut. Still the gravity compression force of a BH could take
that compressed walnut and further compress it to a pea(or smaller)
Neutron stars must vary in size,and magnetic field strength. Mass of the
entire solar system would make a city size neutron star Read
that some where. Always like to keep in my mind the great power of a
pulsar's magnetic field for as a single object it must have the
strongest field. How does it beam it so tight, Such narrow cones. Makes
me think along laser emissions. Well we have counted 100,000 of these
exotic objects in our galaxy since their discovery in the mid 60s. I
hope one of those was found as a remnant in the Crab Nebula,or Supernova
1987A Those two explosions were witnessed by humankind. I saw 1987A as
did most people.. Bert

On Tue, 08 Nov 2005 22:22:52 -0500, G=EMC^2 Glazier wrote:

Hi Luigi Right you are it is not pulsing giving out radio photon
burst.

Photons are always EM waves, moron.

Best call it a 20 mile in diameter round object with the mass
about 8 times greater than the Sun. Like it is written a type 2
supernova always leave behind a neutron star. I'll throw this in a
neutron stars gravity can compress all of humankind into an area the
size of a walnut.

And your brain into the size of one neutron.

Still the gravity compression force of a BH could take
that compressed walnut and further compress it to a pea(or smaller)

Or transfer it to the other side of the hyperspace, idiot.


Neutron stars must vary in size,and magnetic field strength. Mass of the
entire solar system would make a city size neutron star Read
that some where. Always like to keep in my mind the great power of a
pulsar's magnetic field for as a single object it must have the
strongest field. How does it beam it so tight, Such narrow cones. Makes
me think along laser emissions.

Laser emissions have nothing to do with it, ignoramus, laser emissions are
based on phase coherence, not with strenghts of magnetic fields.

Well we have counted 100,000 of these
exotic objects in our galaxy since their discovery in the mid 60s. I
hope one of those was found as a remnant in the Crab Nebula,or Supernova
1987A Those two explosions were witnessed by humankind. I saw 1987A as
did most people.. Bert


--

mhm 27x12
smeeter #28
Usenet Valhalla Circle #19 & #21
Bartlo's hate lits #1:
CEO Alcatroll Labs Inc.

The Way of the Kook:
http://www.insurgent.org/~jhd/kookway.htm

in
Alexa "Crackpot" Cameron explains electromagnetism, and how
the sun has an 'iron core':
"The sun and the earth are 'magnets', each with an iron
based core, and both have an electrical force between them."

in Message-ID:
Mark "Woody" Ferguson shows his mastery of the English language:
"With patients and practice you could be nominated next time around..."

in Message-MID:
Mark "The illiterate" Ferguson astonishes everybody saying:
"Oh, for ****s sake, Gary no matter how angery he thinks he makes there
are lines I will not cross unless I believe what I say is the true, I
know more then you."

in Message-ID:
Alexa "Tequila Titsz" Cameron explains world religions:
"The jews roots are islamic."

in Message-ID:
Alexa "dumbass" Cameron shows her knowledge of history:
"WRONGO. There was NO Bible before King James had it written."

in Message-ID:
Alexa "Word Salad" Cameron shows her knowledge of science:
"Einstein never found the double superimposed doubl 'equilateral' triangle."

in Message-ID:
Alexa "Kook of the year 2004" Cameron uses words she doesn't understand again:
"Why is the Pentagon killing American citizens with non-lethal technology?"

in Message-ID:
Alexa "Imnotalexadammit" Cameron has problems with that extra finger
on her hand:
"Why do the Jews use the Star of David as symbolic of the Pentagon, or
Pentagram?"

reminder: Message-ID: in
The quote naziwhore Don Ocean stole.

I didn't know you were around 200,000 years or so ago, BEERT!

I haven't seen the Magellanic Clouds for 20-30 years. So I saw just
pictures, not the real thing! Or, is that what you meant?

Saul Levy


On Tue, 8 Nov 2005 22:22:52 -0500, (G=EMC^2
Glazier) wrote:

Hi Luigi Right you are it is not pulsing giving out radio photon
burst. Best call it a 20 mile in diameter round object with the mass
about 8 times greater than the Sun. Like it is written a type 2
supernova always leave behind a neutron star. I'll throw this in a
neutron stars gravity can compress all of humankind into an area the
size of a walnut. Still the gravity compression force of a BH could take
that compressed walnut and further compress it to a pea(or smaller)
Neutron stars must vary in size,and magnetic field strength. Mass of the
entire solar system would make a city size neutron star Read
that some where. Always like to keep in my mind the great power of a
pulsar's magnetic field for as a single object it must have the
strongest field. How does it beam it so tight, Such narrow cones. Makes
me think along laser emissions. Well we have counted 100,000 of these
exotic objects in our galaxy since their discovery in the mid 60s. I
hope one of those was found as a remnant in the Crab Nebula,or Supernova
1987A Those two explosions were witnessed by humankind. I saw 1987A as
did most people.. Bert