the ellipse note [link]

To John

The stupidity of homogenising axial and orbital motion and refering
cyclical seasonal changes to changes in the Sun's position off the
Equator/axis just highlights the awful maneuvering of Flamsteed in his
attempt to link axial rotation to the celestial sphere.

There is that much work for an astronomer to correct these
wayward,uneccesary and inappropriate maneuvering by cataloguers and
mathematical theorists at the expense of real astronomy.A good theorist
would simply make the compromises and turn to the correct re-alignment
of astronomical principles for whatever purposes he chooses.

If they think that exotic nonsense like 'branes' appeal to people who
are keeping an eye on climate imbalances,earthquakes and things where
the motions of the Earth are involved as a mechanism
,astronomical,climatological,geological and bottom line.

Without the correct relationship between axial and orbital motion
contained in the original heliocntric reasoning,humanity will suffer
the indignity of 'experts' who are working off the wrong relationship
for exotic theoretical nonsense going back 100 years.

The indignity visited on my attempts to get people to review the
original heliocentric reasoning is nothing compared to what is visited
on the real insights and the men who came up with them and on future
generations who cannot defend themselves against pretensious
nonsense.My answer to Brian contained only technical details,no more
and no less,and the conclusion is correct in regard to how Newton got
his mean Sun/Earth distances through the sidereal format.