![]() |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In sci.space.policy Bob Haller wrote:
Other than exploration, what else can nsa do? My idea ![]() Naah. Not likely enough. What we need is an equally funded operation to cause asteroid strikes, and let competition take its course. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 09 Oct 2005 04:30:13 GMT, Ian Stirling wrote:
In sci.space.policy Bob Haller wrote: Other than exploration, what else can nsa do? My idea ![]() Naah. Not likely enough. What we need is an equally funded operation to cause asteroid strikes, and let competition take its course. Brilliant idea. Not sure which side I would root for, though... Dale |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 1 Oct 2005 20:31:23 -0700, "Bob Haller" wrote:
Other than exploration, what else can nsa do? My idea ![]() You sure do have a peculiar understanding of probability and statistics... Brian |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Brian Thorn wrote: You sure do have a peculiar understanding of probability and statistics... But even as Brian typed, asteroid 1313666...which forever after would be known as "Chicken Little", began it's devastating course toward our planet.... Never again would Disney Studios be allowed to name an asteroid as a movie tie-in. :-) Pat |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Brian Thorn wrote in
: On 1 Oct 2005 20:31:23 -0700, "Bob Haller" wrote: Other than exploration, what else can nsa do? My idea ![]() You sure do have a peculiar understanding of probability and statistics... Probability and statistics aside, I'm wondering why he thinks the National Security Agency is right for the job... -- JRF Reply-to address spam-proofed - to reply by E-mail, check "Organization" (I am not assimilated) and think one step ahead of IBM. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jorge R. Frank" wrote in message ... Brian Thorn wrote in : On 1 Oct 2005 20:31:23 -0700, "Bob Haller" wrote: Other than exploration, what else can nsa do? My idea ![]() You sure do have a peculiar understanding of probability and statistics... Probability and statistics aside, I'm wondering why he thinks the National Security Agency is right for the job... Umm, why why.. they're in charge of the security of our nation! Says so right in the name! -- JRF Reply-to address spam-proofed - to reply by E-mail, check "Organization" (I am not assimilated) and think one step ahead of IBM. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 9 Oct 2005 12:08:00 -0500, Jorge R. Frank wrote
(in article ): Brian Thorn wrote in : On 1 Oct 2005 20:31:23 -0700, "Bob Haller" wrote: Other than exploration, what else can nsa do? My idea ![]() You sure do have a peculiar understanding of probability and statistics... Probability and statistics aside, I'm wondering why he thinks the National Security Agency is right for the job... I wondered that, too, but didn't want to bother to reply to more hllrrbsmsss. -- "Fame may be fleeting but obscurity is forever." ~Anonymous "I believe as little as possible and know as much as I can." ~Todd Stuart Phillips www.angryherb.net |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Unofficial Space Shuttle Launch Guide | Steven S. Pietrobon | Space Shuttle | 0 | September 2nd 05 04:13 AM |
Japans Moon Ambitions - They're KIDDING, Right ? | Bill Bonde ( ''The chamber was in confusion, all t | Policy | 437 | April 14th 05 12:57 PM |
Unofficial Space Shuttle Launch Guide | Steven S. Pietrobon | Space Shuttle | 0 | February 4th 05 04:21 AM |
International Space Station Science - One of NASA's rising stars | Jacques van Oene | Space Station | 0 | December 27th 03 01:32 PM |
Our future as a species - Fermi Paradox revisted - Where they all are | william mook | Policy | 157 | November 19th 03 12:19 AM |