A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Astronomy Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Probably a dumb question ...



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 31st 05, 03:08 PM
Luigi Caselli
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Zilva Zanga" ha scritto nel messaggio
...
from someone with an interest but no education in this area.
If the universe is expanding, doesn't that mean that there is a boundary

to
what scientists define as the universe? If yes, what's on the other side?


Being the whole universe a huge computer simulation the question has no
answer.
After my death I'll ask the Big Programmers, if they think I'm so
interesting, as a sim, to live in another computer simulation...
If not, they simply will turn off my qbit soul.
Sounds a bit unlikely, but who knows?
Maybe also the pawns on my chessboard think they're fighting a real war...

Luigi Caselli


  #2  
Old August 31st 05, 05:44 PM
Jonathan Silverlight
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In message , Luigi Caselli
writes
"Zilva Zanga" ha scritto nel messaggio
u...
from someone with an interest but no education in this area.
If the universe is expanding, doesn't that mean that there is a boundary

to
what scientists define as the universe? If yes, what's on the other side?


Being the whole universe a huge computer simulation the question has no
answer.
After my death I'll ask the Big Programmers, if they think I'm so
interesting, as a sim, to live in another computer simulation...


What makes you think you'll meet me? :-)
  #3  
Old August 31st 05, 09:16 PM
Luigi Caselli
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Jonathan Silverlight" ha
scritto nel messaggio ...
In message , Luigi Caselli
writes
"Zilva Zanga" ha scritto nel messaggio
u...
from someone with an interest but no education in this area.
If the universe is expanding, doesn't that mean that there is a

boundary
to
what scientists define as the universe? If yes, what's on the other

side?

Being the whole universe a huge computer simulation the question has no
answer.
After my death I'll ask the Big Programmers, if they think I'm so
interesting, as a sim, to live in another computer simulation...


What makes you think you'll meet me? :-)


Because, just after my death, I'll see a Silver Light and Jonathan, the
Chief Programmer, will answer some dumb questions about the simulation...
:-)

Luigi Caselli


  #4  
Old September 4th 05, 04:07 AM
Skywise
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Zilva Zanga" wrote in
:

from someone with an interest but no education in this area.
If the universe is expanding, doesn't that mean that there is a boundary
to what scientists define as the universe? If yes, what's on the other
side?


"Misconceptions about the Big Bang"
http://tinyurl.com/4hw24

Brian
--
http://www.skywise711.com - Lasers, Seismology, Astronomy, Skepticism

Seismic FAQ: http://www.skywise711.com/SeismicFAQ/SeismicFAQ.html

Sed quis custodiet ipsos Custodes?
  #5  
Old September 29th 05, 03:31 PM
Asimov
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Zilva Zanga" bravely wrote to "All" (31 Aug 05 15:36:15)
--- on the heady topic of "Probably a dumb question ..."

ZZ From: "Zilva Zanga"
ZZ Xref: core-easynews sci.astro:444924

ZZ from someone with an interest but no education in this area.
ZZ If the universe is expanding, doesn't that mean that there is a
ZZ boundary to what scientists define as the universe? If yes, what's on
ZZ the other side?


As it stands the universe has no boundary except how far in the past
we can measure it. The earliest record gives the universe a limit of
when the primordial energy was able to liberate itself from matter and
space became opaque to radiation.

Metaphysically speaking, the universe is in our minds. The unknown
parts of the universe are where new symbols need to be created to
describe what we perceive or imagine. At the frontier of our
knowledge, the universe thus will be what we want it to be. However,
perhaps 100 years from now, just like the flat earth folk and Earth
centric people, we will have to reconsider any misconceptions we make
today about the universe.

A*s*i*m*o*v

.... Galileo: Condemned in 1633. Pardoned 359 years later. About time!!

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
OT simple and probably dumb math question Dazzer UK Astronomy 9 December 6th 03 10:36 PM
ODDS AGAINST EVOLUTION (You listenin', t.o.?) Lord Blacklight Astronomy Misc 56 November 21st 03 02:45 PM
PX question Bored Huge Krill Astronomy Misc 4 August 10th 03 02:54 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:56 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.